中国行为医学科学
中國行為醫學科學
중국행위의학과학
2008年
12期
1130-1131
,共2页
孙金荣%程灶火%刘新民%沙维伟%丁兆生%卜茹%杨碧秀
孫金榮%程竈火%劉新民%沙維偉%丁兆生%蔔茹%楊碧秀
손금영%정조화%류신민%사유위%정조생%복여%양벽수
认知能力%华文认知能力测验%难度%区分度
認知能力%華文認知能力測驗%難度%區分度
인지능력%화문인지능력측험%난도%구분도
Cognitive Ability%Chinese Cognitive Ability Scale(CCAS)%Difficulty%Discrimination
目的 本研究的目的是验证新编华文认知能力测验(CCAS)项目的难度和区分度.方法 按分层随机取样法,在芜湖和无锡各选两所幼儿园、小学和中学.在每个学校每个年级各选2个班,在每个班随机抽取6~7名学生,年龄范围在6~16岁,确保每个年龄组30人(男女各半),实际取样333人,其中男167人,女166人.用华文认知能力测验对每个人组儿童进行个别测试,同时收集影响智力发展的相关因素.结果 1.项目的难度:华文认知能力测验各项目的难度分布在0.00~1.00之间,其中难度系数在0.30~0.70的条目占条目总数的60%,近似正态分布.2.项目的区分度:从总体看,63%条目的鉴别指数在0.2以上,85%的条目与分测验总分的相关系数在0.2以上.各分测验的鉴别指数除数字广度(0.24)和空间广度(0.22)外,其余均在0.31~0.51之间.结论 CCAS各分测验项目的难度分布合理、区分度较理想.
目的 本研究的目的是驗證新編華文認知能力測驗(CCAS)項目的難度和區分度.方法 按分層隨機取樣法,在蕪湖和無錫各選兩所幼兒園、小學和中學.在每箇學校每箇年級各選2箇班,在每箇班隨機抽取6~7名學生,年齡範圍在6~16歲,確保每箇年齡組30人(男女各半),實際取樣333人,其中男167人,女166人.用華文認知能力測驗對每箇人組兒童進行箇彆測試,同時收集影響智力髮展的相關因素.結果 1.項目的難度:華文認知能力測驗各項目的難度分佈在0.00~1.00之間,其中難度繫數在0.30~0.70的條目佔條目總數的60%,近似正態分佈.2.項目的區分度:從總體看,63%條目的鑒彆指數在0.2以上,85%的條目與分測驗總分的相關繫數在0.2以上.各分測驗的鑒彆指數除數字廣度(0.24)和空間廣度(0.22)外,其餘均在0.31~0.51之間.結論 CCAS各分測驗項目的難度分佈閤理、區分度較理想.
목적 본연구적목적시험증신편화문인지능력측험(CCAS)항목적난도화구분도.방법 안분층수궤취양법,재무호화무석각선량소유인완、소학화중학.재매개학교매개년급각선2개반,재매개반수궤추취6~7명학생,년령범위재6~16세,학보매개년령조30인(남녀각반),실제취양333인,기중남167인,녀166인.용화문인지능력측험대매개인조인동진행개별측시,동시수집영향지력발전적상관인소.결과 1.항목적난도:화문인지능력측험각항목적난도분포재0.00~1.00지간,기중난도계수재0.30~0.70적조목점조목총수적60%,근사정태분포.2.항목적구분도:종총체간,63%조목적감별지수재0.2이상,85%적조목여분측험총분적상관계수재0.2이상.각분측험적감별지수제수자엄도(0.24)화공간엄도(0.22)외,기여균재0.31~0.51지간.결론 CCAS각분측험항목적난도분포합리、구분도교이상.
Objective To examine the difficulty and discrimination of the items in Chinese cognitive ability scale(CCAS).Methods By employing stratified sampling method,333(167 boys,166 girls) prospective subjects were recruited at random from the kindergartens,elementary schools or middle schools in both Wuxi and Wuhu City.Two classes in each school were enrolled in this study and 6 or 7 students were included randomlv with an age range of 6 to 16 years and females-male ratio of 1:1.All participants received no special education or related services.Demographieal date of each student undergone the CCAS were collected.Results 1.Difficulty:the difficulty of the iterms in the CCAS ranged from 0.00 to 1.00 and 60%of them ranged from 0.30 to 0.70.These resuits took normal approximation.2.Discrimination:in general 63% items of all the subtests were over 0.2.Thediscrimination of digit span subtest was 0.24, the spatial span was 0.22 and the rest ranged from 0.31 to 0.51.Conclusion The difficulty in all subtests is of reasonable design and the discrimination comes measurement to psychometric standard.