国际护理学杂志
國際護理學雜誌
국제호이학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING
2010年
12期
1775-1777
,共3页
慢性阻塞性肺疾病%社会支持%应付方式%生活质量
慢性阻塞性肺疾病%社會支持%應付方式%生活質量
만성조새성폐질병%사회지지%응부방식%생활질량
COPD%Social support%Coping style%Quality of life
目的 探讨社会支持对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者应付生活方式的影响.方法 选择62例老年COPD患者进行应付问卷(WOCS)和世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(WHOQCL-BREF)评定.结果 62例慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者SSRS总分及主观支持、客观支持、支持利用度因子评分分别为(38.46±7.83)分,(18.22±4.13)分,(10.91±1.51)分,(9.32±1.40)分.其中＜35分者(低分组)24例;＞45分者(高分组)16例;35～45分者22例.社会支持高分组慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者生理领域、心理领域、社会关系领域、环境领域评分,显著高于社会支持低分组,差异有显著性(P＜0.05或P＜0.01).结论 社会支持程度对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者应付方式及生活质量具有重要影响,良好的社会支持有助于患者采取积极的应付方式、提高患者的生活质量.
目的 探討社會支持對老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者應付生活方式的影響.方法 選擇62例老年COPD患者進行應付問捲(WOCS)和世界衛生組織生存質量測定量錶簡錶(WHOQCL-BREF)評定.結果 62例慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者SSRS總分及主觀支持、客觀支持、支持利用度因子評分分彆為(38.46±7.83)分,(18.22±4.13)分,(10.91±1.51)分,(9.32±1.40)分.其中＜35分者(低分組)24例;＞45分者(高分組)16例;35～45分者22例.社會支持高分組慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者生理領域、心理領域、社會關繫領域、環境領域評分,顯著高于社會支持低分組,差異有顯著性(P＜0.05或P＜0.01).結論 社會支持程度對慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者應付方式及生活質量具有重要影響,良好的社會支持有助于患者採取積極的應付方式、提高患者的生活質量.
목적 탐토사회지지대노년만성조새성폐질병(COPD)환자응부생활방식적영향.방법 선택62례노년COPD환자진행응부문권(WOCS)화세계위생조직생존질량측정량표간표(WHOQCL-BREF)평정.결과 62례만성조새성폐질병환자SSRS총분급주관지지、객관지지、지지이용도인자평분분별위(38.46±7.83)분,(18.22±4.13)분,(10.91±1.51)분,(9.32±1.40)분.기중＜35분자(저분조)24례;＞45분자(고분조)16례;35～45분자22례.사회지지고분조만성조새성폐질병환자생리영역、심리영역、사회관계영역、배경영역평분,현저고우사회지지저분조,차이유현저성(P＜0.05혹P＜0.01).결론 사회지지정도대만성조새성폐질병환자응부방식급생활질량구유중요영향,량호적사회지지유조우환자채취적겁적응부방식、제고환자적생활질량.
Objective To investigate the impact on coping style of social support on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) . Methods There were 62 elderly COPD patients assessed by WOCS and the Word Health Organization Quality of life BREF (WHOQC_BREF) assessment. Results The total scores fo 62 patients of SSRS, subjective support, objective support and support using degree respectively were ( 38.46 ± 7.83 ), ( 18.22 ± 4.13), ( 10.91 ± 1.51, (9.32 ± 1.40) . There were 24 cases lower than 35 points (low score group), 16 cases higher than45 points (high score group) , and22 cases between 35 and45 points. WHOQCL-BREF evaluation of physiological, psychological, social relations and environmental field of the high social support group were significantly higher than those of the low social support group (P ＜0.05 or P ＜0.01 ) . Conclusions The degree of social support has an important impact on COPD patients'coping style and life quality and good social support helps patients take an active approach to deal with and improve the quality of life.
