CAJ | 학술논문

前理解影响着刑法解释，进而影响着刑法解释限度。有效制约前理解对刑法解释限度探询的消极影响，发挥前理解对刑法解释限度探询的积极作用，需要我们将前理解理性化。社会公众愿望对刑法解释限度的探究发挥着重要作用，但作为说明性理由，不具备正当化能力；考量公众愿望必须在法律标准的范围内，对公众愿望进行理性、合法的吸纳。国家的公共政策和刑事政策对刑法解释限度产生着根本性、实质性的影响，欲控制国家的公共、刑事政策对刑法解释过度的扩张，有必要将公共政策和刑事政策纳入法治的轨道：首先要将公共政策和刑事政策纳入传统刑法法治——权利话语体系之内，以恒久性的权利话语限制随机性的权力关系；其次要结合行为社会危害性的本质，在深思动用刑罚的必要性、可能性和效益性基础上来考虑是否介入政策实盾性的影响．
전리해영향착형법해석，진이영향착형법해석한도。유효제약전리해대형법해석한도탐순적소겁영향，발휘전리해대형법해석한도탐순적적겁작용，수요아문장전리해이성화。사회공음원망대형법해석한도적탐구발휘착중요작용，단작위설명성이유，불구비정당화능력；고량공음원망필수재법률표준적범위내，대공음원망진행이성、합법적흡납。국가적공공정책화형사정책대형법해석한도산생착근본성、실질성적영향，욕공제국가적공공、형사정책대형법해석과도적확장，유필요장공공정책화형사정책납입법치적궤도：수선요장공공정책화형사정책납입전통형법법치——권리화어체계지내，이항구성적권리화어한제수궤성적권력관계；기차요결합행위사회위해성적본질，재심사동용형벌적필요성、가능성화효익성기출상래고필시부개입정책실순성적영향．
Pre-understanding affects the interpretation of criminal law, and thus affects the limits of criminal law interpretation. It is necessary to rationalize pre-understanding so as to control effectively its negative impact on and facilitate its positive role in probing into the limits of interpretation. Public desire from society plays an important part in exploring the limits of interpretation of criminal law, but as a descriptive reason, it is not legally justified; public desire must be considered in the scope of legal standards, and it should be in- cluded rationally and legally. National public policy and criminal policy have a fundamental, substantial impact on the limits of criminal law interpretation. In order to control the expansion of excessive interpretation of the state＇ s public and criminal policy on criminal law, it is necessary to integrate the public and criminal policy into law governance： first, we shall integrate the public and criminal policy into the traditional criminal law governance--power discourse system, with constant power discourse limiting random authority relations; second, considering the nature of behavior which harms the society, we shall decide whether to involve the substantial influence of policy based on the necessity, possibility and the benefits of using penalty.