CAJ | 학술논문

951名深圳大学生使用 SEEQ问卷的中译本对教师进行教学效果评价。其中 141名大学生评价“好”与“差”教师的教学，并以此与 844名香港大学生的测试结果进行比较。结果表明， SEEQ问卷具有较好的适用性；深港两地学生对有效教学评价标准的认同比较一致，主要体现在教学热情和教学组织，但在学科价值、上课活力与风趣、做笔记与教学水平的关系的认同程度上略有差异。
951명심수대학생사용 SEEQ문권적중역본대교사진행교학효과평개。기중 141명대학생평개“호”여“차”교사적교학，병이차여 844명향항대학생적측시결과진행비교。결과표명， SEEQ문권구유교호적괄용성；심항량지학생대유효교학평개표준적인동비교일치，주요체현재교학열정화교학조직，단재학과개치、상과활력여풍취、주필기여교학수평적관계적인동정도상략유차이。
951 Shenzhen University students are asked to use the Chinese version of SEEQ instrument to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of their teachers. Among them, 141 are asked to evaluate the teaching of “ good” and “ bad” teachers. The evaluation result is compared with that of 844 Hong Kong University students. It is found that the SEEQ instrument is good in applicability. Shenzhen students are well identified with Hong Kong students in evaluation standards of effective teaching, concentrating on teaching enthusiasm and teaching organization. However, When it comes to the relationship between subject values, class dynamics and humor, note taking and teaching standards, there are slight differences among the students of the two regions.