中华骨科杂志
中華骨科雜誌
중화골과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS
2011年
1期
50-54
,共5页
林建聪%郑亚才%严康宁%李应国%郑毅全%林文祥
林建聰%鄭亞纔%嚴康寧%李應國%鄭毅全%林文祥
림건총%정아재%엄강저%리응국%정의전%림문상
脊柱骨折%外科手术,微创性%骨折固定术
脊柱骨摺%外科手術,微創性%骨摺固定術
척주골절%외과수술,미창성%골절고정술
Spinal fractures%Surgical procedures,minimally invasive%Fracture fixation
目的 评价小切口腹膜外入路手术治疗下腰椎爆裂性骨折的疗效,并探讨手术技巧.方法 回顾性分析小切口腹膜外入路手术治疗的21例严重下腰椎爆裂性骨折病例.男15例,女6例;年龄19~65岁,平均35.9岁.L3 10例,L4 8例,L5 3例.按照Magerl分型(AO分型):A类(爆裂型)12例,B类(分离型)2例,C类(扭转型)7例.所有病例均行小切口腹膜外入路伤椎部分切除减压、植骨融合及内固定.分别比较术前与术后即刻的影像学指标变化,及术前与术后末次随访时神经功能(ASIA分级)的变化.结果 术后平均随访41.9个月(12~86个月).术后即刻影像学资料显示:伤椎椎体前缘高度由术前平均42.62%±10.32%恢复至94.33%±5.23%(P<0.01),椎管受堵指数由术前平均2.67±0.86恢复至0.14±0.36(P<0.01).除1例L3、T11骨折并完全截瘫者外,余有神经损伤者在术后末次随访时均出现一级以上的恢复.随访期间内固定无松动、断裂等发生.结论 对于严重下腰椎爆裂性骨折,采用小切口腹膜外入路进行减压和固定,具有创伤小、神经功能恢复良好的效果.
目的 評價小切口腹膜外入路手術治療下腰椎爆裂性骨摺的療效,併探討手術技巧.方法 迴顧性分析小切口腹膜外入路手術治療的21例嚴重下腰椎爆裂性骨摺病例.男15例,女6例;年齡19~65歲,平均35.9歲.L3 10例,L4 8例,L5 3例.按照Magerl分型(AO分型):A類(爆裂型)12例,B類(分離型)2例,C類(扭轉型)7例.所有病例均行小切口腹膜外入路傷椎部分切除減壓、植骨融閤及內固定.分彆比較術前與術後即刻的影像學指標變化,及術前與術後末次隨訪時神經功能(ASIA分級)的變化.結果 術後平均隨訪41.9箇月(12~86箇月).術後即刻影像學資料顯示:傷椎椎體前緣高度由術前平均42.62%±10.32%恢複至94.33%±5.23%(P<0.01),椎管受堵指數由術前平均2.67±0.86恢複至0.14±0.36(P<0.01).除1例L3、T11骨摺併完全截癱者外,餘有神經損傷者在術後末次隨訪時均齣現一級以上的恢複.隨訪期間內固定無鬆動、斷裂等髮生.結論 對于嚴重下腰椎爆裂性骨摺,採用小切口腹膜外入路進行減壓和固定,具有創傷小、神經功能恢複良好的效果.
목적 평개소절구복막외입로수술치료하요추폭렬성골절적료효,병탐토수술기교.방법 회고성분석소절구복막외입로수술치료적21례엄중하요추폭렬성골절병례.남15례,녀6례;년령19~65세,평균35.9세.L3 10례,L4 8례,L5 3례.안조Magerl분형(AO분형):A류(폭렬형)12례,B류(분리형)2례,C류(뉴전형)7례.소유병례균행소절구복막외입로상추부분절제감압、식골융합급내고정.분별비교술전여술후즉각적영상학지표변화,급술전여술후말차수방시신경공능(ASIA분급)적변화.결과 술후평균수방41.9개월(12~86개월).술후즉각영상학자료현시:상추추체전연고도유술전평균42.62%±10.32%회복지94.33%±5.23%(P<0.01),추관수도지수유술전평균2.67±0.86회복지0.14±0.36(P<0.01).제1례L3、T11골절병완전절탄자외,여유신경손상자재술후말차수방시균출현일급이상적회복.수방기간내고정무송동、단렬등발생.결론 대우엄중하요추폭렬성골절,채용소절구복막외입로진행감압화고정,구유창상소、신경공능회복량호적효과.
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of surgical treatment of lower lumbar fracture with mini-incision via retroperitoneal anterior approach. Methods The data of 21 cases with serious lower lumbar burst fracture were analyzed retrospectively. There were 15 males and 6 females with an average age of 35.9 years (ranged, 19-65 years). The lesion was located in L3 in 10 cases, L4 in 8 and L5 in 3cases. According to Magerl classification, there was type A (burst in 12 cases, type B (distraction) in 2 and type C (retortion) in 7 cases. All the 21 cases were treated with anterior decompression, bone graft fusion and internal fixation with mini-incision via retroperitoneal anterior approach. The changes of radiograph and neurologic status were recorded respectively. Results All the cases had been followed up for an average of 41.9 months (12-86 months). The radiograph showed obvious improvement on the injured body height (from 42.62% preoperatively to 94.33% postoperatively, P<0.01) and the canal encroachment index (from 2.67 preoperatively to 0.14 postoperatively, P<0.01). Significant improvement in neurological function were achieved in all patients with the improvement of one grade except for 1 case with L3, T11 fracture and complete paraplegia. No failure of implants was found during the follow-up period. Conclusion Anterior decompression and internal fixation with mini-incision via retroperitoneal anterior approach are successful in treating serious lower lumbar burst fractures.