中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2012年
5期
532-535
,共4页
徐朝英%韩宏云%徐桂红%彭晶晶
徐朝英%韓宏雲%徐桂紅%彭晶晶
서조영%한굉운%서계홍%팽정정
强迫症%综合护理干预%SCL-90%SDS
彊迫癥%綜閤護理榦預%SCL-90%SDS
강박증%종합호리간예%SCL-90%SDS
Obsessive compulsive disorder%Comprehensive nursing intervention%SCL-90%SDS
目的 探讨综合护理干预对强迫症患者的影响.方法 将60例强迫症患者随机分为对照组(n=30)及观察组(n=30),对照组接受常规药物治疗、精神科一般护理和健康教育,观察组在此基础上给予综合护理干预.分别于干预前及干预后6周对研究对象运用症状自评量表(SCL-90)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)测定,比较两组得分情况.结果 干预前两组患者SCL-90评分和SDS评分差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05);干预后观察组SCL-90评分强迫(1.69±0.74)分、人际关系敏感(1.53±0.77)分、抑郁(1.82±0.61)分、焦虑(1.45±0.72)分、恐怖(1.62±0.51)分、偏执(1.67±0.72)分、精神病性(1.63±0.48)分、敌对(1.60±0.58)分、躯体化(1.52±0.50)分均低于对照组(2.17±0.81),(1.92±0.75),(2.32±0.54),(1.98±0.83),(1.93±0.47),(1.74±0.56),(1.71±0.56),(1.89±0.63),(1.92±0.48)分,观察组SDS评分(38.56±6.13)分低于对照组(62.12±6.24)分,差异均有统计学意义(t分别为3.12,5.46,4.21,3.78,5.09,3.02,3.90,3.23,2.85,6.87;P＜0.05).结论 综合护理干预可减轻强迫症患者抑郁、焦虑、恐怖等症状,促进疾病康复.
目的 探討綜閤護理榦預對彊迫癥患者的影響.方法 將60例彊迫癥患者隨機分為對照組(n=30)及觀察組(n=30),對照組接受常規藥物治療、精神科一般護理和健康教育,觀察組在此基礎上給予綜閤護理榦預.分彆于榦預前及榦預後6週對研究對象運用癥狀自評量錶(SCL-90)和抑鬱自評量錶(SDS)測定,比較兩組得分情況.結果 榦預前兩組患者SCL-90評分和SDS評分差異均無統計學意義(P＞0.05);榦預後觀察組SCL-90評分彊迫(1.69±0.74)分、人際關繫敏感(1.53±0.77)分、抑鬱(1.82±0.61)分、焦慮(1.45±0.72)分、恐怖(1.62±0.51)分、偏執(1.67±0.72)分、精神病性(1.63±0.48)分、敵對(1.60±0.58)分、軀體化(1.52±0.50)分均低于對照組(2.17±0.81),(1.92±0.75),(2.32±0.54),(1.98±0.83),(1.93±0.47),(1.74±0.56),(1.71±0.56),(1.89±0.63),(1.92±0.48)分,觀察組SDS評分(38.56±6.13)分低于對照組(62.12±6.24)分,差異均有統計學意義(t分彆為3.12,5.46,4.21,3.78,5.09,3.02,3.90,3.23,2.85,6.87;P＜0.05).結論 綜閤護理榦預可減輕彊迫癥患者抑鬱、焦慮、恐怖等癥狀,促進疾病康複.
목적 탐토종합호리간예대강박증환자적영향.방법 장60례강박증환자수궤분위대조조(n=30)급관찰조(n=30),대조조접수상규약물치료、정신과일반호리화건강교육,관찰조재차기출상급여종합호리간예.분별우간예전급간예후6주대연구대상운용증상자평량표(SCL-90)화억욱자평량표(SDS)측정,비교량조득분정황.결과 간예전량조환자SCL-90평분화SDS평분차이균무통계학의의(P＞0.05);간예후관찰조SCL-90평분강박(1.69±0.74)분、인제관계민감(1.53±0.77)분、억욱(1.82±0.61)분、초필(1.45±0.72)분、공포(1.62±0.51)분、편집(1.67±0.72)분、정신병성(1.63±0.48)분、활대(1.60±0.58)분、구체화(1.52±0.50)분균저우대조조(2.17±0.81),(1.92±0.75),(2.32±0.54),(1.98±0.83),(1.93±0.47),(1.74±0.56),(1.71±0.56),(1.89±0.63),(1.92±0.48)분,관찰조SDS평분(38.56±6.13)분저우대조조(62.12±6.24)분,차이균유통계학의의(t분별위3.12,5.46,4.21,3.78,5.09,3.02,3.90,3.23,2.85,6.87;P＜0.05).결론 종합호리간예가감경강박증환자억욱、초필、공포등증상,촉진질병강복.
Objective To explore the effects of comprehensive nursing intervention on patients with obsessive compulsive disorder.Methods Totals of 60 patients were randomly divided into control group (30ceses) and observation group (30cases),control group received conventional medicine therapy,ordinary nursing and heahh education of psychiatry department.On this basic,observation group received comprehensive nursing intervention.Before and after six weeks intervention,patients were investigated with symptoms Checklists ( SCL-90 ) and self-depression scale (SDS),and results were compared.Results The difference of SCL-90 score and SDS score between two groups was not detected ( P ＞ 0.05 ).After intervention,SCL-90 score ( 1.69 ± 0.74),interpersonal relationship sensitivity score( 1.53 ± 0.77),depression score ( 1.82 ± 0.61 ),anxiety score ( 1.45 ±0.72),terror score(1.62 ±0.51),paranoia score (1.67 ±0.72),psychotism score (1.63 ±0.48),hostility score ( 1.60 ± 0.58),somatization score( 1.52 ± 0.50) of observation group lower than that of control group which score in order was (2.17 ±0.81),(1.92 ±0.75),(2.32 ±0.54),(1.98 ±0.83),(1.93 ±0.47),(1.74 ±0.56),(1.71 ±0.56) (1.89 ±0.63),( 1.92 ±0.48),and the score of SDS of observation group was(38.56 ±6.13) lower than(62.12 ±6.24)of control group,difference between two groups was statistically significant(t=3.12,5.46,4.21,3.78,5.09,3.02,3.90,3.23,2.85,6.87; P ＜ 0.05 ).Conclusions Comprehensive nursing intervention can alleviate patients' depression,anxiety,terror and so on,which promote patients to recovery from disease.
