中华超声影像学杂志
中華超聲影像學雜誌
중화초성영상학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY
2012年
3期
201-204
,共4页
刘冬%王金锐%钱林学%胡向东%邱兰燕
劉鼕%王金銳%錢林學%鬍嚮東%邱蘭燕
류동%왕금예%전림학%호향동%구란연
超声检查%微气泡%肝硬化
超聲檢查%微氣泡%肝硬化
초성검사%미기포%간경화
Ultrasonography%Microbubbles%Liver cirrhosis
目的 探讨超声造影反映肝硬化进程中肝血流灌注的变化规律.方法 对40例肝硬化患者(病例组)和25例健康人(对照组)进行超声造影检查,应用QLAB分析软件,将肝实质作为感兴趣区绘制时间-强度曲线,测量肝动脉灌注时间(Tap)及肝动脉灌注强度(Iap),肝实质灌注达峰时间(Tpeak)及肝实质灌注峰值强度(Ipeak),门静脉灌注达峰时间(Tpp,Tpp=Tpeak,-Taf)及门静脉灌注强度(Ipp,Ipp=Ipaek -Iaf),计算Ipp/Ipeak值.比较两组间Iap、Ipeak、Ipp及Ipp/Ipeak的差异,并应用受试者操作特性(ROC)曲线进行分析.结果 病例组与对照组比较,Iap增大(P<0.001),Ipp、Ipp/Ipaek均缩小(P <0.001).而Ipeak在两组间差异无统计学意义.Iap、Ipp、Ipp/Ipeak诊断肝硬化的灵敏度分别为67.3%、92.7%、96.4%,特异度分别为80.0%、96.0%、92.3%.结论 超声造影参数可以反映肝硬化肝血流灌注的变化,尤其Ipp/Ipeak在肝硬化和正常肝之间存在显著差异.
目的 探討超聲造影反映肝硬化進程中肝血流灌註的變化規律.方法 對40例肝硬化患者(病例組)和25例健康人(對照組)進行超聲造影檢查,應用QLAB分析軟件,將肝實質作為感興趣區繪製時間-彊度麯線,測量肝動脈灌註時間(Tap)及肝動脈灌註彊度(Iap),肝實質灌註達峰時間(Tpeak)及肝實質灌註峰值彊度(Ipeak),門靜脈灌註達峰時間(Tpp,Tpp=Tpeak,-Taf)及門靜脈灌註彊度(Ipp,Ipp=Ipaek -Iaf),計算Ipp/Ipeak值.比較兩組間Iap、Ipeak、Ipp及Ipp/Ipeak的差異,併應用受試者操作特性(ROC)麯線進行分析.結果 病例組與對照組比較,Iap增大(P<0.001),Ipp、Ipp/Ipaek均縮小(P <0.001).而Ipeak在兩組間差異無統計學意義.Iap、Ipp、Ipp/Ipeak診斷肝硬化的靈敏度分彆為67.3%、92.7%、96.4%,特異度分彆為80.0%、96.0%、92.3%.結論 超聲造影參數可以反映肝硬化肝血流灌註的變化,尤其Ipp/Ipeak在肝硬化和正常肝之間存在顯著差異.
목적 탐토초성조영반영간경화진정중간혈류관주적변화규률.방법 대40례간경화환자(병례조)화25례건강인(대조조)진행초성조영검사,응용QLAB분석연건,장간실질작위감흥취구회제시간-강도곡선,측량간동맥관주시간(Tap)급간동맥관주강도(Iap),간실질관주체봉시간(Tpeak)급간실질관주봉치강도(Ipeak),문정맥관주체봉시간(Tpp,Tpp=Tpeak,-Taf)급문정맥관주강도(Ipp,Ipp=Ipaek -Iaf),계산Ipp/Ipeak치.비교량조간Iap、Ipeak、Ipp급Ipp/Ipeak적차이,병응용수시자조작특성(ROC)곡선진행분석.결과 병례조여대조조비교,Iap증대(P<0.001),Ipp、Ipp/Ipaek균축소(P <0.001).이Ipeak재량조간차이무통계학의의.Iap、Ipp、Ipp/Ipeak진단간경화적령민도분별위67.3%、92.7%、96.4%,특이도분별위80.0%、96.0%、92.3%.결론 초성조영삼수가이반영간경화간혈류관주적변화,우기Ipp/Ipeak재간경화화정상간지간존재현저차이.
Objective To evaluate hepatic perfusion assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) for predicting cirrhosis accurately and non-invasively.Methods Forty patients with cirrhosis and twenty-five healthy controls were given CEUS examination,and time-intensity curves were drawn as the regions of interest located in liver parenchyma by using QLAB analyzing soft.The parameters of the two groups as follows:intensity of arterial perfusion (Iap),intensity of total perfusion of liver parenchyma (Ipeak),intensity of portal venous perfusion (Ipp),the ratio of portal venous perfusion and total perfusion (Ipp/Ipeak) were compared by independent-samples t test,and the diagnostic value of parameters were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Resnlts Iap was bigger,while Ipp,Ipp/Ipeak were smaller in patients than that in controls( P <0.001 ).But there was no significant difference on Ipeak between the two groups.When Iap,Ipp,Ipp/Ipeak were used for the diagnosis of cirrhosis,the sensitivity were 67.3 %,92.7%,96.4% and the specificity were 80.0%,96.0%,92.3%,respectively.Conclusions CEUS can reflect the changes of the blood perfusion of cirrhotic liver.CEUS parameters Iap,Ipp,Ipp/Ipeak are significant different between the two groups and can be the non-invasive diagosis parameters of cirrhosis.