中华骨科杂志
中華骨科雜誌
중화골과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS
2009年
3期
207-211
,共5页
刘智%孙天胜%陈晓斌%张建政%马舟涌
劉智%孫天勝%陳曉斌%張建政%馬舟湧
류지%손천성%진효빈%장건정%마주용
多处创伤%骨折%外科手术
多處創傷%骨摺%外科手術
다처창상%골절%외과수술
Multiple trauma%Fractures%Surgical procedures,operative
目的 探讨伤害控制骨科学(damage control orthopaedics,DCO)原则治疗骨科严重多发创伤的可行性和有效性.方法 按照DCO原则收治严重多发创伤患者47例,男35例,女12例;年龄17~55岁,平均32.8岁;开放骨折28例,闭合骨折19例;颅脑损伤15例,胸部损伤20例,腹部损伤17例.患者术前损伤严重度评分平均33.4分,系统炎性反应评分平均2.9分,格拉斯哥昏迷评分平均11.4分.结果 一期手术中骨科处理时间平均65 min,术中出血量平均185 ml;一期术后平均7 d行骨折确定性手术,平均手术时间(142±29)min,术中出血量(420±70)ml.一期术后3例患者死亡,其中1例伴严重创伤性颅脑损伤,2例伴严重胸腹部损伤.术后3例出现腹腔内脓肿,经引流冲洗后治愈;2例发生外固定架针道浅表感染和1例深部感染,经治疗后愈合.无一例出现脂肪栓塞、深静脉血栓等其他并发症和与骨科治疗有关的其他系统病情的恶化.39例患者获得随访,随访时间3~14个月,平均9个月.骨折愈合时间5~14个月,未发现畸形愈合及远期并发症.结论 运用DCO原则治疗骨科多发创伤,可减少患者二次打击程度,控制炎性反应水平的增加,降低手术治疗风险,临床结果较好.
目的 探討傷害控製骨科學(damage control orthopaedics,DCO)原則治療骨科嚴重多髮創傷的可行性和有效性.方法 按照DCO原則收治嚴重多髮創傷患者47例,男35例,女12例;年齡17~55歲,平均32.8歲;開放骨摺28例,閉閤骨摺19例;顱腦損傷15例,胸部損傷20例,腹部損傷17例.患者術前損傷嚴重度評分平均33.4分,繫統炎性反應評分平均2.9分,格拉斯哥昏迷評分平均11.4分.結果 一期手術中骨科處理時間平均65 min,術中齣血量平均185 ml;一期術後平均7 d行骨摺確定性手術,平均手術時間(142±29)min,術中齣血量(420±70)ml.一期術後3例患者死亡,其中1例伴嚴重創傷性顱腦損傷,2例伴嚴重胸腹部損傷.術後3例齣現腹腔內膿腫,經引流遲洗後治愈;2例髮生外固定架針道淺錶感染和1例深部感染,經治療後愈閤.無一例齣現脂肪栓塞、深靜脈血栓等其他併髮癥和與骨科治療有關的其他繫統病情的噁化.39例患者穫得隨訪,隨訪時間3~14箇月,平均9箇月.骨摺愈閤時間5~14箇月,未髮現畸形愈閤及遠期併髮癥.結論 運用DCO原則治療骨科多髮創傷,可減少患者二次打擊程度,控製炎性反應水平的增加,降低手術治療風險,臨床結果較好.
목적 탐토상해공제골과학(damage control orthopaedics,DCO)원칙치료골과엄중다발창상적가행성화유효성.방법 안조DCO원칙수치엄중다발창상환자47례,남35례,녀12례;년령17~55세,평균32.8세;개방골절28례,폐합골절19례;로뇌손상15례,흉부손상20례,복부손상17례.환자술전손상엄중도평분평균33.4분,계통염성반응평분평균2.9분,격랍사가혼미평분평균11.4분.결과 일기수술중골과처리시간평균65 min,술중출혈량평균185 ml;일기술후평균7 d행골절학정성수술,평균수술시간(142±29)min,술중출혈량(420±70)ml.일기술후3례환자사망,기중1례반엄중창상성로뇌손상,2례반엄중흉복부손상.술후3례출현복강내농종,경인류충세후치유;2례발생외고정가침도천표감염화1례심부감염,경치료후유합.무일례출현지방전새、심정맥혈전등기타병발증화여골과치료유관적기타계통병정적악화.39례환자획득수방,수방시간3~14개월,평균9개월.골절유합시간5~14개월,미발현기형유합급원기병발증.결론 운용DCO원칙치료골과다발창상,가감소환자이차타격정도,공제염성반응수평적증가,강저수술치료풍험,림상결과교호.
Objective To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the damage control orthopedics (DCO) strategy in the treatment of multiple traumas combine with bone injuries. Methods Forty-seven se-vere multiple injuries patients were treated by DCO strategy in our center. There were 35 males, 12 females, with a mean age of 32.8 years (17-55 years). There were 28 for open fractures, and 19 for close fractures. Other system injuries mainly include: brain injury 15 cases, breast injury 20 cases, abdominal injury 17 cases. Mean injury severity score was 33.4, mean glasgow coma score was 11.4, mean systemic inflammatory response syndrome score was 2.9. After the early resuscitation and one-stage of damage control surgery, all patients were send to ICU for a profound resuscitation. Two -stage definitive osteosynthesis were executed when the patients were stabilization. The data of time spend, blood loss, and complications of operations were recorded to evaluation. Results In the one-stage procedure, the mean time spend on bone injury for each patients was 65 min, blood loss during the operation was 185 ml. The two-stage definitive osteosynthesis were performed average 7 days after the one-stage procedure, and the time spend and blood loss during the oper-ation were (142±29) min and (420±70) ml, respectively. Three patients died from the deteriorate after one-stage procedure. Six cases development complications after the operation. Fat embolism, deep vein thrombus and others deteriorate associate with the one-stage procedure were not found. Four patients were all obtained neurologic improvement who has spinal fractures combined with spinal cord injuries. 39 cases were followed up for a mean time of 9 months (range, 3-14 months). No long-term complications were found, and the frac-tures got a satisfactory healing. Conclusion DCO appears to reduce the extent of second-hit, control the in-crease of systematic inflammatory response, deduce the risk of the operation for those severe multiple trauma patients, and have a satisfactory clinical outcome, is a safe, effective, feasible treatment strategy.