中华麻醉学杂志
中華痳醉學雜誌
중화마취학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY
2010年
10期
1153-1155
,共3页
李巅远%晏馥霞%肖文静%陶天富%逢坤静%魏以桢%闫军
李巔遠%晏馥霞%肖文靜%陶天富%逢坤靜%魏以楨%閆軍
리전원%안복하%초문정%도천부%봉곤정%위이정%염군
喉面罩%呼吸,人工%心肺转流术%心脏外科手术%儿童
喉麵罩%呼吸,人工%心肺轉流術%心髒外科手術%兒童
후면조%호흡,인공%심폐전류술%심장외과수술%인동
Laryngeal mask%Respiration,artificial%Cardiopulmonary bypass%Cardiac surgical procedures%Child
目的 评价ProSeal喉罩用于体外循环心内直视术患儿气道管理的效果.方法 择期拟行心内直视术患儿76例,年龄3月~8岁,体重3.3~34.5 kg,性别不限,ASA分级Ⅱ级,心功能分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,随机分为2组(n=38):气管导管组(T组)和ProSeal喉罩组(P组).麻醉诱导后,T组置入气管导管,P组置入ProSeal喉罩,行机械通气.记录气管导管和喉罩的置入情况、置入时间、最高气道压、术中低氧血症、心动过速、心动过缓、低血压和高血压的发生情况、术后喉头水肿、吞咽困难、呛咳、呼吸困难、声音嘶哑的发生情况.结果 气管导管和ProSeal喉罩全部置入成功.两组术中均未见低氧血症、心动过速、心动过缓、低血压和高血压的发生.与T组比较,P组置入时间缩短,喉头水肿和吞咽困难的发生率降低(P<0.05),最高气道压、呛咳、呼吸困难和声音嘶哑的发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论ProSeal喉罩置入简单易行,可有效保证通气,对咽喉部刺激较小,用于体外循环心内直视术患儿的气道管理安全可靠.
目的 評價ProSeal喉罩用于體外循環心內直視術患兒氣道管理的效果.方法 擇期擬行心內直視術患兒76例,年齡3月~8歲,體重3.3~34.5 kg,性彆不限,ASA分級Ⅱ級,心功能分級Ⅰ或Ⅱ級,隨機分為2組(n=38):氣管導管組(T組)和ProSeal喉罩組(P組).痳醉誘導後,T組置入氣管導管,P組置入ProSeal喉罩,行機械通氣.記錄氣管導管和喉罩的置入情況、置入時間、最高氣道壓、術中低氧血癥、心動過速、心動過緩、低血壓和高血壓的髮生情況、術後喉頭水腫、吞嚥睏難、嗆咳、呼吸睏難、聲音嘶啞的髮生情況.結果 氣管導管和ProSeal喉罩全部置入成功.兩組術中均未見低氧血癥、心動過速、心動過緩、低血壓和高血壓的髮生.與T組比較,P組置入時間縮短,喉頭水腫和吞嚥睏難的髮生率降低(P<0.05),最高氣道壓、嗆咳、呼吸睏難和聲音嘶啞的髮生率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論ProSeal喉罩置入簡單易行,可有效保證通氣,對嚥喉部刺激較小,用于體外循環心內直視術患兒的氣道管理安全可靠.
목적 평개ProSeal후조용우체외순배심내직시술환인기도관리적효과.방법 택기의행심내직시술환인76례,년령3월~8세,체중3.3~34.5 kg,성별불한,ASA분급Ⅱ급,심공능분급Ⅰ혹Ⅱ급,수궤분위2조(n=38):기관도관조(T조)화ProSeal후조조(P조).마취유도후,T조치입기관도관,P조치입ProSeal후조,행궤계통기.기록기관도관화후조적치입정황、치입시간、최고기도압、술중저양혈증、심동과속、심동과완、저혈압화고혈압적발생정황、술후후두수종、탄인곤난、창해、호흡곤난、성음시아적발생정황.결과 기관도관화ProSeal후조전부치입성공.량조술중균미견저양혈증、심동과속、심동과완、저혈압화고혈압적발생.여T조비교,P조치입시간축단,후두수종화탄인곤난적발생솔강저(P<0.05),최고기도압、창해、호흡곤난화성음시아적발생솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론ProSeal후조치입간단역행,가유효보증통기,대인후부자격교소,용우체외순배심내직시술환인적기도관리안전가고.
Objective To investigate the use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) ProSeal for airway management during open heart surgery performed under CPB in children. Methods Seventy-six ASA Ⅱ and NYHA class Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients aged 3 months-8 yr, weighing 3.3-34.5 kg undergoing open heart surgery under CPB were randomly divided into 2 groups ( n = 38 each): tracheal intubation group (group T) and ProSeal LMA group (group P1). Tracheal tube and LMA were inserted after induction of anesthesia with 8% sevoflurane. The rate of successfultracheal intubation and LMA placement, placement time, peak airway pressure and side effects during and after surgery including hypoxemia, tachycardia, bradycardia, hypotension and hypertension, laryngesl edema, dysphagia, bucking, dyspnea and hoarseness were recorded. Results There were no significant differences in the rate of successftl tracheal intubation and LMA placement, peak airway pressure, bucking, dyspnea and hoarse voice between the two groups (P> 0.05). The LMA placement time was significantly shorter than tracheal intubation time and the incidence of laryngeal edema and dysphagia lower in group P than in group T ( P < 0.05). Conclusion The LMA ProSeal can provide adequate ventilation during operation with less complications and can be used effectively for cardiac surgery performed under CPB in children.