中华创伤杂志
中華創傷雜誌
중화창상잡지
Chinese Journal of Traumatology
2010年
11期
991-994
,共4页
詹开喜%王以进%华全科%蔡水奇%王大斌
詹開喜%王以進%華全科%蔡水奇%王大斌
첨개희%왕이진%화전과%채수기%왕대빈
胫骨骨折%生物力学%胫骨平台后侧解削型钢板
脛骨骨摺%生物力學%脛骨平檯後側解削型鋼闆
경골골절%생물역학%경골평태후측해삭형강판
Tibial fractures%Biomechanics%Posterior tibial anatomic plate
目的 探讨胫骨平台后侧解剖型钢板的生物力学性能.方法 将25具新鲜冰冻成年尸体胫骨上端及匹配的股骨下端标本按随机数字表法分为四组.1具标本作为正常对照组(N组).其余24具均造成Schatzker Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折,随机分为三组,每组8具,后侧分别采用胫骨平台后侧解剖型钢板(A组)、"T"形钢板(B组)、直型重建钢板(C组)固定,后两组为对照组,测试各组钢板的强度、刚度、扭转生物力学及失效载荷性能.结果 试验组复杂胫骨平台骨折的强度和刚度超过N组(P>0.05),在扭转生物力学性能上接近N组(P>0.05);试验组在强度、刚度、扭转生物力学性能和失效载荷性能优于B、C组(P<0.05).结论 胫骨平台后侧解剖型钢板具有优越的生物力学性能,在治疗胫骨平台后侧骨折及膝关节的稳定性较其他内固定材料好,是胫骨平台后侧骨折固定较为理想的选择.
目的 探討脛骨平檯後側解剖型鋼闆的生物力學性能.方法 將25具新鮮冰凍成年尸體脛骨上耑及匹配的股骨下耑標本按隨機數字錶法分為四組.1具標本作為正常對照組(N組).其餘24具均造成Schatzker Ⅵ型脛骨平檯骨摺,隨機分為三組,每組8具,後側分彆採用脛骨平檯後側解剖型鋼闆(A組)、"T"形鋼闆(B組)、直型重建鋼闆(C組)固定,後兩組為對照組,測試各組鋼闆的彊度、剛度、扭轉生物力學及失效載荷性能.結果 試驗組複雜脛骨平檯骨摺的彊度和剛度超過N組(P>0.05),在扭轉生物力學性能上接近N組(P>0.05);試驗組在彊度、剛度、扭轉生物力學性能和失效載荷性能優于B、C組(P<0.05).結論 脛骨平檯後側解剖型鋼闆具有優越的生物力學性能,在治療脛骨平檯後側骨摺及膝關節的穩定性較其他內固定材料好,是脛骨平檯後側骨摺固定較為理想的選擇.
목적 탐토경골평태후측해부형강판적생물역학성능.방법 장25구신선빙동성년시체경골상단급필배적고골하단표본안수궤수자표법분위사조.1구표본작위정상대조조(N조).기여24구균조성Schatzker Ⅵ형경골평태골절,수궤분위삼조,매조8구,후측분별채용경골평태후측해부형강판(A조)、"T"형강판(B조)、직형중건강판(C조)고정,후량조위대조조,측시각조강판적강도、강도、뉴전생물역학급실효재하성능.결과 시험조복잡경골평태골절적강도화강도초과N조(P>0.05),재뉴전생물역학성능상접근N조(P>0.05);시험조재강도、강도、뉴전생물역학성능화실효재하성능우우B、C조(P<0.05).결론 경골평태후측해부형강판구유우월적생물역학성능,재치료경골평태후측골절급슬관절적은정성교기타내고정재료호,시경골평태후측골절고정교위이상적선택.
Objective To investigate the biomechanical properties of the posterior tibial anatomic plate. Methods A total of 25 fresh frozen adult tibial top and matching femur specimens were randomly divided into four groups. One specimen was used as normal control ( N group), and the remaining 24specimens were with Schatzker Ⅵ tibial plateau fracture and accompanied by rear split and backward fracture displacement. The lateral margin of the tibia was fixed with a L-type plate, and the medial margin was fixed with the same plate after remodeling. The 24 specimens were divided into three groups, eight specimens per group. The posterior margin of the tibia was fixed by posterior tibial anatomic plate ( Group A), T-type plate ( Group B) or straight reconstruction plate ( Group C). The strength, stiffness, torsional biomechanics and failure load performance of the plates in each group were evaluated. Results The strength and stiffness of test groups was superior to that of Group N ( P > 0.05 ), and the torsional biomechanics of test groups was close to that of Group N ( P > 0.05 ). The posterior tibial anatomic plate was superior to T-type plate and straight reconstruction plate in aspects of strength, stiffness, torsional biomechanics and failure load performance ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusions Posterior tibial anatomic plate has excellent biomechanical properties, and it is superior to other materials in treating posterior tibial plateau fracture and restoring the stability of the knee.