中华普通外科杂志
中華普通外科雜誌
중화보통외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GENERAL SURGERY
2011年
9期
721-725
,共5页
官国先%蒋伟忠%刘星%陈致奋%卢辉山%张祥福
官國先%蔣偉忠%劉星%陳緻奮%盧輝山%張祥福
관국선%장위충%류성%진치강%로휘산%장상복
腺癌%食管胃接合处%淋巴结切除术
腺癌%食管胃接閤處%淋巴結切除術
선암%식관위접합처%림파결절제술
Adenocarcinoma%Esophagogastic junction%Lymph node excision
目的 探讨不同手术径路治疗进展期SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部腺癌(食管浸润≤3 cm)的优缺点及疗效。方法 对251例SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部腺癌患者施行D2或D2+的全胃切除术,其中经腹部正中切口组(the transabdominal approach,TA组)128例,经左胸腹联合切口组(the left thoracoabdominal approach,LTA组)123例,对两组的手术时间、术中出血量、远段食管切除长度、上切缘癌残留率、平均淋巴结清扫数目、围术期并发症发生率、病死率以及术后3、5年总体生存率进行对比分析。结果 TA组和LTA组的术后3、5年总体生存率分别为62.5%、39.0%和54.9%、31.9%,两组相比差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。LTA组的远段食管切除长度较TA组稍长(5.6±1.1) cm比(5.4±1.1)cm,但两组手术的切缘癌残留率为1.6%(LTA组)比3.1%(TA组),差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。TA组手术平均淋巴结清扫数目(23.4±8.7)枚,与LTA组的(23.7±8.4)枚比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。TA组在手术时间(227±24)min、术中出血量(270±78) ml及围术期并发症发生率(13.3%)和病死率(1.6%)方面均明显优于LTA组[(261±32) min、(342±59)ml,26.8%和6.5%],差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论 对SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部腺癌(食管浸润≤3 cm)患者,经腹部正中切口行全胃切除术(D2或D2+淋巴结切除术)可达到良好的根治目的,且围术期并发症的发生率和病死率均较低。
目的 探討不同手術徑路治療進展期SiewertⅡ型食管胃結閤部腺癌(食管浸潤≤3 cm)的優缺點及療效。方法 對251例SiewertⅡ型食管胃結閤部腺癌患者施行D2或D2+的全胃切除術,其中經腹部正中切口組(the transabdominal approach,TA組)128例,經左胸腹聯閤切口組(the left thoracoabdominal approach,LTA組)123例,對兩組的手術時間、術中齣血量、遠段食管切除長度、上切緣癌殘留率、平均淋巴結清掃數目、圍術期併髮癥髮生率、病死率以及術後3、5年總體生存率進行對比分析。結果 TA組和LTA組的術後3、5年總體生存率分彆為62.5%、39.0%和54.9%、31.9%,兩組相比差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。LTA組的遠段食管切除長度較TA組稍長(5.6±1.1) cm比(5.4±1.1)cm,但兩組手術的切緣癌殘留率為1.6%(LTA組)比3.1%(TA組),差異均無統計學意義(均P>0.05)。TA組手術平均淋巴結清掃數目(23.4±8.7)枚,與LTA組的(23.7±8.4)枚比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。TA組在手術時間(227±24)min、術中齣血量(270±78) ml及圍術期併髮癥髮生率(13.3%)和病死率(1.6%)方麵均明顯優于LTA組[(261±32) min、(342±59)ml,26.8%和6.5%],差異均具有統計學意義(均P<0.05)。結論 對SiewertⅡ型食管胃結閤部腺癌(食管浸潤≤3 cm)患者,經腹部正中切口行全胃切除術(D2或D2+淋巴結切除術)可達到良好的根治目的,且圍術期併髮癥的髮生率和病死率均較低。
목적 탐토불동수술경로치료진전기SiewertⅡ형식관위결합부선암(식관침윤≤3 cm)적우결점급료효。방법 대251례SiewertⅡ형식관위결합부선암환자시행D2혹D2+적전위절제술,기중경복부정중절구조(the transabdominal approach,TA조)128례,경좌흉복연합절구조(the left thoracoabdominal approach,LTA조)123례,대량조적수술시간、술중출혈량、원단식관절제장도、상절연암잔류솔、평균림파결청소수목、위술기병발증발생솔、병사솔이급술후3、5년총체생존솔진행대비분석。결과 TA조화LTA조적술후3、5년총체생존솔분별위62.5%、39.0%화54.9%、31.9%,량조상비차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。LTA조적원단식관절제장도교TA조초장(5.6±1.1) cm비(5.4±1.1)cm,단량조수술적절연암잔류솔위1.6%(LTA조)비3.1%(TA조),차이균무통계학의의(균P>0.05)。TA조수술평균림파결청소수목(23.4±8.7)매,여LTA조적(23.7±8.4)매비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。TA조재수술시간(227±24)min、술중출혈량(270±78) ml급위술기병발증발생솔(13.3%)화병사솔(1.6%)방면균명현우우LTA조[(261±32) min、(342±59)ml,26.8%화6.5%],차이균구유통계학의의(균P<0.05)。결론 대SiewertⅡ형식관위결합부선암(식관침윤≤3 cm)환자,경복부정중절구행전위절제술(D2혹D2+림파결절제술)가체도량호적근치목적,차위술기병발증적발생솔화병사솔균교저。
Objective To compare the effects of different surgical approaches on Siewert Ⅱ (esophageal invasion ≤3 cm) adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction. Methods This retrospective study included 251 cases of Siewert Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction undergoing D2 or D2 + total gastrectomy by transabdominal approach ( TA group, 128 cases) or left thoracoabdominal approach ( LTA group, 123 cases). Operation time,blood loss, extent of esophageal resection, number of lymph nodes dissected,morbidity, mortality and the survival rate were a analyzed between the two groups. Results The 3,5-year overall survival rates were 62. 5%, 39.0% ( TA group) and 54. 9%, 31.9% ( LTA group),respectively (P > 0. 05). Length of esophageal resection in the LTA group were slightly longer than that in the TA group (5. 6 ± 1.1) cm vs. (5.4 ± 1.1 ) cm (P <0. 05), the positive surgical margin between two groups were not statistically different[1.6% ( LTA group) vs. 3. 1% ( TA group), ( P > 0. 05 )]. The mean number of removed lymph node were not significantly different between two groups[23.4 ± 8.7 ( TA group) vs. 23.7 ± 8.4 ( LTA group)], ( P > 0. 05 ). The operation time (227 ± 24) min, blood loss (270 ± 78)ml, and perioperative morbidity( 13.3% ) and mortality( 1.6% ) in TA group was significantly better than the LTA group[(261 ±32) min, (342 ±59)ml, 26.8%, 6.5%](P<0.05). Conclusions For Siewert Ⅱ adenocarcinoma at esophagogastric junction (esophageal invasion ≤3 cm) ,total gastrectomy with D2 or D2 + lymph node dissection through the transabdominal approach could achieve curative purposes, with a low morbidity and mortality rate.