中华预防医学杂志
中華預防醫學雜誌
중화예방의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF
2010年
10期
928-931
,共4页
陈海婴%胡广汉%宋矿余%熊志伟%万保平%杨平一%胡嘉%彭国华%胡位陈%付国兰
陳海嬰%鬍廣漢%宋礦餘%熊誌偉%萬保平%楊平一%鬍嘉%彭國華%鬍位陳%付國蘭
진해영%호엄한%송광여%웅지위%만보평%양평일%호가%팽국화%호위진%부국란
血吸虫病%学生%健康促进%干预性研究
血吸蟲病%學生%健康促進%榦預性研究
혈흡충병%학생%건강촉진%간예성연구
Schistosomiasis%Student%Health promotion%Intervention studies
目的 研究重度疫区"无血吸虫感染者学校"干预模式,有效控制和预防学生感染血吸虫.方法 选择鄱阳湖血吸虫病重疫区新建、南昌、进贤和高新等4县(区)12所小学为研究现场,整群随机将其中10所小学分为实验组,另2所小学为对照组,所有在校学生为研究对象.2005年进行基线调查,2006-2008年对实验组应用"信息传播+行为参与+行为激励"模式进行干预,并考核干预效果.结果 干预前(2005年),实验组和对照组目标人群血防知识知晓率分别为14.75%(324/2196)、16.58%(91/549),两组差异无统计学意义(x2=1.14,P>0.05);血防态度正确率分别为14.71%(323/2196)、11.84%(65/549),两组差异无统计学意义(x2=2.98,P>0.05);接触疫水率分别为15.44%(18 988/122 976)、15.03%(4622/30 744),两组差异无统计学意义(x2=3.13,P>0.05);血吸虫感染率分别为9.65%(212/2196)、10.56%(58/549),两组差异无统计学意义(x2=0.41,P>0.05).干预后第1年(2006年),实验组和对照组血防知识知晓率分别为97.79%(2032/2078)、18.11%(98/541),两组差异有统计学意义(x2=1794.31,P<0.01);血防态度正确率分别为99.09%(2059/2078)、13.49%(73/541),两组差异有统计学意义(x2=2077.45,P<0.01).干预后1~3年(2006-2008年),实验组连续3年未见接触疫水者和血吸虫感染者;同期对照组接触疫水率分别为16.12%(4884/30 296)、11.11%(3079/27 720)、12.25%(3451/28 168),血吸虫感染率分别为8.87%(48/541)、7.47%(37/495)、7.95%(40/503).结论 "信息传播+行为参与+行为激励"健康促进模式干预可有效控制和预防重疫区学生感染血吸虫.
目的 研究重度疫區"無血吸蟲感染者學校"榦預模式,有效控製和預防學生感染血吸蟲.方法 選擇鄱暘湖血吸蟲病重疫區新建、南昌、進賢和高新等4縣(區)12所小學為研究現場,整群隨機將其中10所小學分為實驗組,另2所小學為對照組,所有在校學生為研究對象.2005年進行基線調查,2006-2008年對實驗組應用"信息傳播+行為參與+行為激勵"模式進行榦預,併攷覈榦預效果.結果 榦預前(2005年),實驗組和對照組目標人群血防知識知曉率分彆為14.75%(324/2196)、16.58%(91/549),兩組差異無統計學意義(x2=1.14,P>0.05);血防態度正確率分彆為14.71%(323/2196)、11.84%(65/549),兩組差異無統計學意義(x2=2.98,P>0.05);接觸疫水率分彆為15.44%(18 988/122 976)、15.03%(4622/30 744),兩組差異無統計學意義(x2=3.13,P>0.05);血吸蟲感染率分彆為9.65%(212/2196)、10.56%(58/549),兩組差異無統計學意義(x2=0.41,P>0.05).榦預後第1年(2006年),實驗組和對照組血防知識知曉率分彆為97.79%(2032/2078)、18.11%(98/541),兩組差異有統計學意義(x2=1794.31,P<0.01);血防態度正確率分彆為99.09%(2059/2078)、13.49%(73/541),兩組差異有統計學意義(x2=2077.45,P<0.01).榦預後1~3年(2006-2008年),實驗組連續3年未見接觸疫水者和血吸蟲感染者;同期對照組接觸疫水率分彆為16.12%(4884/30 296)、11.11%(3079/27 720)、12.25%(3451/28 168),血吸蟲感染率分彆為8.87%(48/541)、7.47%(37/495)、7.95%(40/503).結論 "信息傳播+行為參與+行為激勵"健康促進模式榦預可有效控製和預防重疫區學生感染血吸蟲.
목적 연구중도역구"무혈흡충감염자학교"간예모식,유효공제화예방학생감염혈흡충.방법 선택파양호혈흡충병중역구신건、남창、진현화고신등4현(구)12소소학위연구현장,정군수궤장기중10소소학분위실험조,령2소소학위대조조,소유재교학생위연구대상.2005년진행기선조사,2006-2008년대실험조응용"신식전파+행위삼여+행위격려"모식진행간예,병고핵간예효과.결과 간예전(2005년),실험조화대조조목표인군혈방지식지효솔분별위14.75%(324/2196)、16.58%(91/549),량조차이무통계학의의(x2=1.14,P>0.05);혈방태도정학솔분별위14.71%(323/2196)、11.84%(65/549),량조차이무통계학의의(x2=2.98,P>0.05);접촉역수솔분별위15.44%(18 988/122 976)、15.03%(4622/30 744),량조차이무통계학의의(x2=3.13,P>0.05);혈흡충감염솔분별위9.65%(212/2196)、10.56%(58/549),량조차이무통계학의의(x2=0.41,P>0.05).간예후제1년(2006년),실험조화대조조혈방지식지효솔분별위97.79%(2032/2078)、18.11%(98/541),량조차이유통계학의의(x2=1794.31,P<0.01);혈방태도정학솔분별위99.09%(2059/2078)、13.49%(73/541),량조차이유통계학의의(x2=2077.45,P<0.01).간예후1~3년(2006-2008년),실험조련속3년미견접촉역수자화혈흡충감염자;동기대조조접촉역수솔분별위16.12%(4884/30 296)、11.11%(3079/27 720)、12.25%(3451/28 168),혈흡충감염솔분별위8.87%(48/541)、7.47%(37/495)、7.95%(40/503).결론 "신식전파+행위삼여+행위격려"건강촉진모식간예가유효공제화예방중역구학생감염혈흡충.
Objective To study an intervention model of "schools without infected students with schistosoma japanica", to control and prevent students from schisotosoma infection. Methods Twelve primary schools of four heavy endemic counties (districts) with schistosomiasis in the Poyang Lake areas were selected as the study fields, of which, ten schools were the experimental groups, and the other two schools were the control groups by cluster random sampling. All enrolment students were the target population. The baseline survey was carried out in 2005, and an intervention model, "information dissemination + behavior participation + behavior encouragement" ,was applied in the experiment groups in 2006 - 2008, then the effect of intervention was assessed. Results Before intervention ( 2005 ) , the antischistosomiasis knowledge awareness rate of experimental and control groups were 14. 75% ( 324/2196 ) and 16. 58% (91/549), and the different was not significant ( x2 = 1.14, P > 0. 05 ) ;the rate of accurate attitude of anti-schistosomiasis were 14. 71% ( 323/2196 ) and 11.84% ( 65/549 ) in experimental and control groups ,and the difference was not significant ( x2 = 2. 98, P > 0. 05 ); the rate of contacting infected water were 15.44% (18 988/122 976) and 15.03% (4622/30 744) in experimental and control group and the difference was not significant ( x2 = 3.13, P > 0. 05 ); and the infection rate of schistosomiasis of experiment control groups were 9. 65% (212/2196)and 10. 56% (58/549) ,the difference was not significant ( x2 =0.41,P>0.05 ). After one year intervention (2006), the anti-schistosomiasis knowledge awareness rate of experimental and control groups were 97. 79% (2032/2078) and 18. 11% (98/541), and the different was significant ( x2 = 1794. 31, P < 0. 01 ); the rate of accurate attitude of anti-schistosomiasis were 99. 09%(2059/2078) and 13.49% (73/541)in experimental and control group, and the difference was significant ( x2 = 2077.45, P < 0. 01 ). After 1 - 3 years intervention ( 2006 - 2008 ), there were no any contactors with infected water and infectors with schistosome in students of the experiment group in successive 3 years. While in the control group of the same period, the rate contacting infected water were 16. 12% (4884/30 296),11.11%(3079/27 720) and 12.25% (3451/28 168); the infection rate of schistosomiasis were 8.87%(48/541) ,7. 47% ( 37/495 ) and 7.95% (40/503), respectively. Conclusion The intervention model of health promotion," information dissemination + behavior participation + behavior encouragement" ,can effectively control and prevent students from infecting schisosome japonica in heavy endemic areas with schistosomaisis.