复旦学报(自然科学版)
複旦學報(自然科學版)
복단학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF FUDAN UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE)
2001年
2期
194-198
,共5页
知识%知识缺口%知识战略%进取型战略%保守型战略
知識%知識缺口%知識戰略%進取型戰略%保守型戰略
지식%지식결구%지식전략%진취형전략%보수형전략
知识经济的兴起使得人们对知识这一重要的战略资源有了新的认识:知识才是最重要的战略,并将构成企业的长期的竞争优势. 但并非所有的知识都能给企业带来这样的优势. 知识可以进一步划分为核心知识、先进知识和革新知识. 只有对这三种知识正确积累或开发,才能分辨出外部知识缺口和内部知识缺口. 在对这两种知识缺口进行正确分析的基础上,对应采取的知识战略作出了分析:开发还是利用,知识来源于内部还是外部?是采取进取型战略还是保守型战略?通过对两类产业中一次性博弈分析,得出:知识密集型产业中的企业应将进取型战略作为最佳知识战略选择;而对于知识稳定型产业中的企业,采用偏保守型的战略是其最佳选择.
知識經濟的興起使得人們對知識這一重要的戰略資源有瞭新的認識:知識纔是最重要的戰略,併將構成企業的長期的競爭優勢. 但併非所有的知識都能給企業帶來這樣的優勢. 知識可以進一步劃分為覈心知識、先進知識和革新知識. 隻有對這三種知識正確積纍或開髮,纔能分辨齣外部知識缺口和內部知識缺口. 在對這兩種知識缺口進行正確分析的基礎上,對應採取的知識戰略作齣瞭分析:開髮還是利用,知識來源于內部還是外部?是採取進取型戰略還是保守型戰略?通過對兩類產業中一次性博弈分析,得齣:知識密集型產業中的企業應將進取型戰略作為最佳知識戰略選擇;而對于知識穩定型產業中的企業,採用偏保守型的戰略是其最佳選擇.
지식경제적흥기사득인문대지식저일중요적전략자원유료신적인식:지식재시최중요적전략,병장구성기업적장기적경쟁우세. 단병비소유적지식도능급기업대래저양적우세. 지식가이진일보화분위핵심지식、선진지식화혁신지식. 지유대저삼충지식정학적루혹개발,재능분변출외부지식결구화내부지식결구. 재대저량충지식결구진행정학분석적기출상,대응채취적지식전략작출료분석:개발환시이용,지식래원우내부환시외부?시채취진취형전략환시보수형전략?통과대량류산업중일차성박혁분석,득출:지식밀집형산업중적기업응장진취형전략작위최가지식전략선택;이대우지식은정형산업중적기업,채용편보수형적전략시기최가선택.
The advent of Knowledge Economy causes the new round of recognition of KNOWLEDGE - a kind of important strategic source - which can support the long-term co m petitive advantage for companies. However, not all knowledge will promise such a dvantage. Knowledge can be divided into core knowledge, advanced knowledge, and innovative knowledge. Only by differentiating these three kinds of knowledge, di sclosing the external knowledge gap and internal knowledge gap can companies loc ate their position in the competition. Based on the right recognition of externa l knowledge gap and internal knowledge gap, companies confront such choices: to dev elop or to utilize; the knowledge comes from internal or external? All the quest ion s above are lead to the final problem: the aggressive knowledge strategy or cons ervative knowledge strategy? The game theory analysis in two different industrie s demonstrates the conclusion: in knowledge-intense industry, the aggressive kn owledge strategy is the best choice; while the companies in knowledge-stable in dustry should take on relatively conservative one.