CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨球旁注射与球结膜下注射2种注射方法对治疗虹膜睫状体炎的不同效果.方法将80例虹膜睫状体炎患者按来院顺序随机分为A组与B组各40例,A组患者行球旁注射,B组患者行球结膜下注射.比较2组注射后并发症发生情况.结果 2组患者在实施治疗后的并发症及相关因素比较差异显著,球旁注射法优于球结膜下注射法.结论球旁注射法是治疗虹膜睫状体炎理想的用药途径,操作简便、安全、快捷、痛苦小,值得推广.
목적 탐토구방주사여구결막하주사2충주사방법대치료홍막첩상체염적불동효과.방법 장80례홍막첩상체염환자안래원순서수궤분위A조여B조각40례,A조환자행구방주사,B조환자행구결막하주사.비교2조주사후병발증발생정황.결과 2조환자재실시치료후적병발증급상관인소비교차이현저,구방주사법우우구결막하주사법.결론 구방주사법시치료홍막첩상체염이상적용약도경,조작간편、안전、쾌첩、통고소,치득추엄.
Objective To discuss different effect of periocular injection and subconjunctival injection in treatment of iridocyclitis. Methods Eighty people with iridocyclitis were divided into group A and group B according to their admission order. Group A adopted periocular injection and group B was given subconjunctival injection. The incidence of complication was compared between the two groups. Results Significant difference existed in complications and related factors between two groups after treatment, periocular injection proved to be superior to subconjunctival injection. Conclusions Periocular injection is a desirable treatment method for iridocyclitis. It is easy to operate, safe, rapid and with less pain, so it is worthy of clinical application.