中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2010年
19期
2239-2243
,共5页
本科护生%癌痛护理%姑息照护%护理教育
本科護生%癌痛護理%姑息照護%護理教育
본과호생%암통호리%고식조호%호리교육
Undergraduate nursing students%Cancer pain nursing%Palliative care%Nursing education
目的 通过对本科护生癌痛护理相关知识认知现状的调查,为更好地开展姑息照护教育提供一定的理论依据.方法 采用自行设计的"癌痛护理知识问卷"对100名全日制护理本科已参加过临床实习、即将毕业的护生进行癌痛护理知识的认知现状调查,运用SPSS 16.0及Excel软件进行数据分析比较.结果 本科护生对于癌痛护理知识的认知是欠缺的,平均答题正确率为46.3%,正确率最高者为93.0%(93/100),最低者为10.0%(10/100).其中关于处理癌痛的方法问题回答正确率最高,其次是对成瘾的认识问题,关于癌痛用药知识回答正确率最低.对三阶梯止痛代表药物了解较好,回答正确率为82.0%.对WHO癌痛治疗原则的要点了解严重不足,只有1名护生能完整写出5个要点的内容,95名回答"不知道",4名写出部分要点但不完全.性别、是否护理过癌症患者、是否接受过相关培训及未来工作意向均与对癌痛护理知识的认知程度不相关(P＞0.05),而对于是否轮转过癌症相关病房与总体上对癌痛护理知识的认知程度不相关(P＞0.05),但轮转过肿瘤科与轮转过其他癌症相关科室的护生,答题正确率均高于轮转过血液科的护生(P＜0.01).结论 应系统地向本科护生进行癌痛护理相关知识的教育.
目的 通過對本科護生癌痛護理相關知識認知現狀的調查,為更好地開展姑息照護教育提供一定的理論依據.方法 採用自行設計的"癌痛護理知識問捲"對100名全日製護理本科已參加過臨床實習、即將畢業的護生進行癌痛護理知識的認知現狀調查,運用SPSS 16.0及Excel軟件進行數據分析比較.結果 本科護生對于癌痛護理知識的認知是欠缺的,平均答題正確率為46.3%,正確率最高者為93.0%(93/100),最低者為10.0%(10/100).其中關于處理癌痛的方法問題迴答正確率最高,其次是對成癮的認識問題,關于癌痛用藥知識迴答正確率最低.對三階梯止痛代錶藥物瞭解較好,迴答正確率為82.0%.對WHO癌痛治療原則的要點瞭解嚴重不足,隻有1名護生能完整寫齣5箇要點的內容,95名迴答"不知道",4名寫齣部分要點但不完全.性彆、是否護理過癌癥患者、是否接受過相關培訓及未來工作意嚮均與對癌痛護理知識的認知程度不相關(P＞0.05),而對于是否輪轉過癌癥相關病房與總體上對癌痛護理知識的認知程度不相關(P＞0.05),但輪轉過腫瘤科與輪轉過其他癌癥相關科室的護生,答題正確率均高于輪轉過血液科的護生(P＜0.01).結論 應繫統地嚮本科護生進行癌痛護理相關知識的教育.
목적 통과대본과호생암통호리상관지식인지현상적조사,위경호지개전고식조호교육제공일정적이론의거.방법 채용자행설계적"암통호리지식문권"대100명전일제호리본과이삼가과림상실습、즉장필업적호생진행암통호리지식적인지현상조사,운용SPSS 16.0급Excel연건진행수거분석비교.결과 본과호생대우암통호리지식적인지시흠결적,평균답제정학솔위46.3%,정학솔최고자위93.0%(93/100),최저자위10.0%(10/100).기중관우처리암통적방법문제회답정학솔최고,기차시대성은적인식문제,관우암통용약지식회답정학솔최저.대삼계제지통대표약물료해교호,회답정학솔위82.0%.대WHO암통치료원칙적요점료해엄중불족,지유1명호생능완정사출5개요점적내용,95명회답"불지도",4명사출부분요점단불완전.성별、시부호리과암증환자、시부접수과상관배훈급미래공작의향균여대암통호리지식적인지정도불상관(P＞0.05),이대우시부륜전과암증상관병방여총체상대암통호리지식적인지정도불상관(P＞0.05),단륜전과종류과여륜전과기타암증상관과실적호생,답제정학솔균고우륜전과혈액과적호생(P＜0.01).결론 응계통지향본과호생진행암통호리상관지식적교육.
Objective To provide background information to improve palliative care education by surveying a group of undergraduate nursing students' knowledge about cancer pain treatment. Methods 100 senior full-time bachelor nursing students were surveyed by using a questionnaire addressing the knowledge of cancer pain treatment. SPSS16. 0 and Excel software were used for data analysis and comparison. Results The average accuracy rate is 46. 13%, the maximum accuracy rate is 80.00% ( 12/15 ), the minimum accuracy rate is 13.33%(2/15), which means undergraduates have limited knowledge about cancer pain treatment. The accuracy rate in the aspect of handling cancer pain is the highest, then the second goes to the knowledge of addiction; and as to the knowledge of medicine treatment of cancer pain students have the lowest accuracy rate. Students got high accuracy rate 82%, in the knowledge of the key medicines of" three-step analgesic". But only one student wrote the 5points of WHO' s cancer pain treatment rules, ninety-five percents express "I don' t know." And Awareness Ievel of cancer pain nursing knowledge is not related to the gender, experiences of taking care of patients with cancer,whether it received the relevant training and future work intentions (P ＞ 0. 05). The average accuracy rate was not influenced by experience in Cancer-related department( P ＞ 0. 05 ). But nursing students with experience in oncology department and other cancer-related department have higher accuracy rate than the one only with the experience in hematology department ( P ＜0. 01 ). Conclusions Systematic education and training on cancer pain treatment should be provided to bachelor nursing students.
