天然气工业
天然氣工業
천연기공업
NATURAL GASINDUSTRY
2009年
12期
83-86
,共4页
喻西崇%李志军%潘鑫鑫%李玉星%郑晓鹏%王珏
喻西崇%李誌軍%潘鑫鑫%李玉星%鄭曉鵬%王玨
유서숭%리지군%반흠흠%리옥성%정효붕%왕각
CO_2%液化管道输送%超临界输送%密相输送%热力学模型%水力学模型
CO_2%液化管道輸送%超臨界輸送%密相輸送%熱力學模型%水力學模型
CO_2%액화관도수송%초림계수송%밀상수송%열역학모형%수역학모형
CO_2%liquefaction pipeline transportation%supercritical transportation%dense-phase transportation%thermodynamic model%hydromechanic model
为了提高CO_2管道输送效率,一般采用超临界密相输送.为此,利用组分热力学模型以及水力学模型,分别对CO_2液化管道输送、超临界输送和密相输送进行分析研究,对不同相态条件下的管道输送规律进行了模拟计算,得到了压力、温度等在输送过程的变化规律,并就压降-长度关系、压降-二氧化碳摩尔流量关系和压降-内径关系对3种输送方式进行了对比,得到如下结论:在相同的情况下,超临界输送时的压降比液化输送和密相输送的压降值要大,而液化输送的压降比密相输送大;超临界输送和密相输送的压力都很高,输送过程中基本不会发生气化,而液化输送随着输送过程中压力的降低、温度的升高,CO_2很容易气化;不同的输送方式无论从经济性还是能耗上都有很大的差别,输送状态的选择要根据整个系统的具体情况进行综合分析和评价.
為瞭提高CO_2管道輸送效率,一般採用超臨界密相輸送.為此,利用組分熱力學模型以及水力學模型,分彆對CO_2液化管道輸送、超臨界輸送和密相輸送進行分析研究,對不同相態條件下的管道輸送規律進行瞭模擬計算,得到瞭壓力、溫度等在輸送過程的變化規律,併就壓降-長度關繫、壓降-二氧化碳摩爾流量關繫和壓降-內徑關繫對3種輸送方式進行瞭對比,得到如下結論:在相同的情況下,超臨界輸送時的壓降比液化輸送和密相輸送的壓降值要大,而液化輸送的壓降比密相輸送大;超臨界輸送和密相輸送的壓力都很高,輸送過程中基本不會髮生氣化,而液化輸送隨著輸送過程中壓力的降低、溫度的升高,CO_2很容易氣化;不同的輸送方式無論從經濟性還是能耗上都有很大的差彆,輸送狀態的選擇要根據整箇繫統的具體情況進行綜閤分析和評價.
위료제고CO_2관도수송효솔,일반채용초림계밀상수송.위차,이용조분열역학모형이급수역학모형,분별대CO_2액화관도수송、초림계수송화밀상수송진행분석연구,대불동상태조건하적관도수송규률진행료모의계산,득도료압력、온도등재수송과정적변화규률,병취압강-장도관계、압강-이양화탄마이류량관계화압강-내경관계대3충수송방식진행료대비,득도여하결론:재상동적정황하,초림계수송시적압강비액화수송화밀상수송적압강치요대,이액화수송적압강비밀상수송대;초림계수송화밀상수송적압력도흔고,수송과정중기본불회발생기화,이액화수송수착수송과정중압력적강저、온도적승고,CO_2흔용역기화;불동적수송방식무론종경제성환시능모상도유흔대적차별,수송상태적선택요근거정개계통적구체정황진행종합분석화평개.
In order to improve pipeline transporting efficiency, CO_2 is generally transported in supercritical dense phase. By use of the component thermodynamic model and the hydromechanic model, this paper made in-depth investigation into three types of CO_2 transmission methods, namely CO_2 liquefaction pipeline transportation, supercritical transportation, and dense-phase transportation. It simulates and calculates the pipeline transportation regularity under different phase conditions and obtains the changing laws of pressure and temperature during the transportation process. It also conducts comparison studies on the relationships between the pressure drop and the length of pipeline, CO_2 molar flow, and the internal diameter of pipeline, respectively, of these three types of transmission methods. The results show that the pressure drop value of supercritical transmission is higher than that of the other two methods; and that of liquefaction pipeline transportation is higher than that of dense-phase transmission. The pressure of supercritical transmission and dense-phase transmission is high and gasification is basically impossible. However, in liquefaction pipeline transportation, as the pressure decreases, its temperature rises, and CO_2 can be easily gasified. The transportation methods differ greatly from each other economically and in terms of energy consumption. The transportation state should be selected in accordance with the integrative analysis and evaluations of the condition of the entire system. This provides good references to the design of CO_2 transportation pipelines.