内蒙古林业科技
內矇古林業科技
내몽고임업과기
INNER MONGOLIA FORESTRY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
2011年
4期
13-16
,共4页
胡尔查%王晓江%张文军%刘永宏%苏楞高娃
鬍爾查%王曉江%張文軍%劉永宏%囌楞高娃
호이사%왕효강%장문군%류영굉%소릉고왜
沙质草原%风蚀破口%人工植被%恢复效果
沙質草原%風蝕破口%人工植被%恢複效果
사질초원%풍식파구%인공식피%회복효과
sandy grassland%blowout pit%artificial vegetation%restoration effects
选取浑善达克沙地南缘沙质草原风蚀破口不同植被恢复模式,对人工林和林下草本层、土壤进行调查,研究了采取不同治理措施9年后的恢复效果。结果表明:在7种不同治理措施下,造林树种生长状况良好,保存率均达到85%以上;在不同模式下,林下草本层发育和生长受到明显影响。樟子松+山杏混交林、柠条锦鸡儿纯林模式下,林下草本植物丰富度和盖度较高。黄柳+杨柴+小叶锦鸡儿混交林下草本种类少,盖度和地上生物量较低。杨树+沙棘混交林、柠条锦鸡儿纯林草本群落中赖草、冰草占优势。沙棘和杨柴林下草本层以沙蓬、黄蒿、雾冰藜等1、2年生沙生植物为主;杨树+沙棘混交林和沙棘纯林林下枯落物较多,其次为黄柳+杨柴+小叶锦鸡儿混交林和杨柴人工林,其他模式下还没有积累枯落物;樟子松+山杏、杨树+沙棘混交林、樟子松林0~40 cm土壤含水率维持在4%~8%之间。黄柳+杨柴+小叶锦鸡儿混交林、柠条锦鸡儿和沙棘人工林下土壤含水率均低于3%,而且在不同土层之间差异较小。
選取渾善達剋沙地南緣沙質草原風蝕破口不同植被恢複模式,對人工林和林下草本層、土壤進行調查,研究瞭採取不同治理措施9年後的恢複效果。結果錶明:在7種不同治理措施下,造林樹種生長狀況良好,保存率均達到85%以上;在不同模式下,林下草本層髮育和生長受到明顯影響。樟子鬆+山杏混交林、檸條錦鷄兒純林模式下,林下草本植物豐富度和蓋度較高。黃柳+楊柴+小葉錦鷄兒混交林下草本種類少,蓋度和地上生物量較低。楊樹+沙棘混交林、檸條錦鷄兒純林草本群落中賴草、冰草佔優勢。沙棘和楊柴林下草本層以沙蓬、黃蒿、霧冰藜等1、2年生沙生植物為主;楊樹+沙棘混交林和沙棘純林林下枯落物較多,其次為黃柳+楊柴+小葉錦鷄兒混交林和楊柴人工林,其他模式下還沒有積纍枯落物;樟子鬆+山杏、楊樹+沙棘混交林、樟子鬆林0~40 cm土壤含水率維持在4%~8%之間。黃柳+楊柴+小葉錦鷄兒混交林、檸條錦鷄兒和沙棘人工林下土壤含水率均低于3%,而且在不同土層之間差異較小。
선취혼선체극사지남연사질초원풍식파구불동식피회복모식,대인공림화림하초본층、토양진행조사,연구료채취불동치리조시9년후적회복효과。결과표명:재7충불동치리조시하,조림수충생장상황량호,보존솔균체도85%이상;재불동모식하,림하초본층발육화생장수도명현영향。장자송+산행혼교림、저조금계인순림모식하,림하초본식물봉부도화개도교고。황류+양시+소협금계인혼교림하초본충류소,개도화지상생물량교저。양수+사극혼교림、저조금계인순림초본군락중뢰초、빙초점우세。사극화양시림하초본층이사봉、황호、무빙려등1、2년생사생식물위주;양수+사극혼교림화사극순림림하고락물교다,기차위황류+양시+소협금계인혼교림화양시인공림,기타모식하환몰유적루고락물;장자송+산행、양수+사극혼교림、장자송림0~40 cm토양함수솔유지재4%~8%지간。황류+양시+소협금계인혼교림、저조금계인화사극인공림하토양함수솔균저우3%,이차재불동토층지간차이교소。
The effects of artificial vegetation restoration in sandy grassland blowout pits under different controlling measures after nine years have been studied.The results show: under seven kinds of different management measures,the plantations grow well,the survival rates of afforestation are more than 85%,and the different measures have influenced the development and growth of herbaceous layer.In the afforestation model of Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica+Prunus armeniaca,Caragana korshinskii,herb layers had the highest species abundance and high coverage.On the contrary,the mode of Salix gordeivii+Hedysarum fruticosum var.mongolicum+Caragana microphylla has lower coverage and aboveground biomass.In model of Populus L.+Hippophae rhamnoides,Caragana korshinskii herb layers,Leymus secalinus and Agropyron cristatum are predominate.Hippophae rhamnoides and Hedysarum fruticosum var.mongolicum herb layers are mainly dominated by annual plants.The amount of litter layer in Populus L.+Hippophae rhamnoides and Hippophae rhamnoides pure forest is bigger than the mixed forest of Salix gordeivii+Hedysarum fruticosum var.mongolicum+ Caragana microphylla and Hedysarum fruticosum var.mongolicum plantation.And there isn't the accumulation of litter in other models.The soil water content at 0~40 cm layer maintained at 4%~8% in Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica+Prunus armeniaca,Populus L.+Hippophae rhamnoides and Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica.In Caragana korshinskii,Salix gordeivii+Hedysarum fruticosum var.mongolicum+Caragana microphylla and Hippophae rhamnoides forest,the soil water content was lower than 3%,with little difference among different soil layers.