CAJ | 학술논문

当面临归类不确定的情景时,人们的特征推理是基于类别进行,还是基于特征联结进行,一直是类别研究中的重要内容。本研究采用预测特征竞争范式对这一问题进行了探究。共两个实验：实验1采用预测特征竞争范式探讨推理前预先归类时,人们的推理方式是基于类别还是基于特征联结。实验2采用预测特征竞争范式探讨推理前不预先归类时,人们的推理是基于类别还是基于特征联结。实验结果表明,推理前预先归类时,被试倾向于基于类别进行推理。推理前不预先归类时,被试倾向于根据特征联结进行推理。
당면림귀류불학정적정경시,인문적특정추리시기우유별진행,환시기우특정련결진행,일직시유별연구중적중요내용。본연구채용예측특정경쟁범식대저일문제진행료탐구。공량개실험：실험1채용예측특정경쟁범식탐토추리전예선귀류시,인문적추리방식시기우유별환시기우특정련결。실험2채용예측특정경쟁범식탐토추리전불예선귀류시,인문적추리시기우유별환시기우특정련결。실험결과표명,추리전예선귀류시,피시경향우기우유별진행추리。추리전불예선귀류시,피시경향우근거특정련결진행추리。
One of the most important functions of category was to predict unknown features.But when categorization was uncertain,how did people predict？ Based on categories or based on feature associations？ A new paradigm in which there were two competitive predicted features was used to investigate it.In the new paradigm,there were two to-be-predicted features;the feature probability of Feature 1 was higher than the Feature 2.If people made predictions based on categories,they would make a higher probability judgment for Feature 1.For feature associations with known features,Feature 2 was higher than Feature 1.If people predicted based on feature associations,they would make a higher probability judgment for Feature 2.There were two experiments;Experiment 1 was interested in how people predicted when categorizations were ordered before prediction.Experiment 2 explored people made predictions based on categories or feature associations when categorizations weren＇t ordered before prediction.The results found that when categorizations were ordered participants predicted based on categories,while categorizations were not ordered,people inclined to predict based on feature associations.The results indicated that people make predictions in an economical cognition processing approach.