针灸推拿医学(英文版)
針灸推拿醫學(英文版)
침구추나의학(영문판)
JOURNAL OF ACUPUNCTURE AND TUINA SCIENCE
2009年
4期
228-230
,共3页
扭伤和劳损%针刺疗法%推拿%按摩
扭傷和勞損%針刺療法%推拿%按摩
뉴상화로손%침자요법%추나%안마
Sprains and Strains%Acupuncture Therapy%Tuina%Massage
目的:观察针刺骨缝配合推拿治疗四肢小关节扭挫伤的临床疗效.方法:将90例四肢小关节[包括掌(跖)指(趾)关节]扭挫伤患者按就诊顺序随机分为针刺组30例,采用单纯针刺骨缝治疗;推拿组30例,采用推拿治疗;观察组30例,采用针刺骨缝结合推拿治疗.每星期治疗6次,为1疗程,治疗2个疗程后观察疗效.结果:观察组、针刺组、推拿组的治愈率分别为50.0%、20.0%、16.7%;总有效率为93.4%、70.0%、73.3%,观察组与针刺组、推拿组相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),针刺组与推拿组差异无统计学意义,提示观察组疗效优于针刺组和推拿组.结论:针刺骨缝配合推拿治疗掌(跖)指(趾)关节扭挫伤有较好的治疗效果.
目的:觀察針刺骨縫配閤推拿治療四肢小關節扭挫傷的臨床療效.方法:將90例四肢小關節[包括掌(蹠)指(趾)關節]扭挫傷患者按就診順序隨機分為針刺組30例,採用單純針刺骨縫治療;推拿組30例,採用推拿治療;觀察組30例,採用針刺骨縫結閤推拿治療.每星期治療6次,為1療程,治療2箇療程後觀察療效.結果:觀察組、針刺組、推拿組的治愈率分彆為50.0%、20.0%、16.7%;總有效率為93.4%、70.0%、73.3%,觀察組與針刺組、推拿組相比,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),針刺組與推拿組差異無統計學意義,提示觀察組療效優于針刺組和推拿組.結論:針刺骨縫配閤推拿治療掌(蹠)指(趾)關節扭挫傷有較好的治療效果.
목적:관찰침자골봉배합추나치료사지소관절뉴좌상적림상료효.방법:장90례사지소관절[포괄장(척)지(지)관절]뉴좌상환자안취진순서수궤분위침자조30례,채용단순침자골봉치료;추나조30례,채용추나치료;관찰조30례,채용침자골봉결합추나치료.매성기치료6차,위1료정,치료2개료정후관찰료효.결과:관찰조、침자조、추나조적치유솔분별위50.0%、20.0%、16.7%;총유효솔위93.4%、70.0%、73.3%,관찰조여침자조、추나조상비,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),침자조여추나조차이무통계학의의,제시관찰조료효우우침자조화추나조.결론:침자골봉배합추나치료장(척)지(지)관절뉴좌상유교호적치료효과.
Objective: To observe the clinical therapeutic effects of acupuncture at the bony clefts in combination with tuina therapy in the treatment of sprains and strains of minor joints at the four extremities. Methods: Ninety cases of sprains and strains of minor joints at four extremities [including metacarpophalangeal (metatarsophalangeal)joints] were divided randomly into three groups by the consulting order. Acupuncture group, in which 30 cases were treated by acupuncture at the bony clefts; tuina group, in which 30 cases were treated by tuina therapy; and observation group, in which 30 cases were treated by acupuncture at the bony clefts and tuina therapy. The treatment was given 6 times a week as one course of treatments, and the therapeutic effects were observed after 2 courses of treatments. Results: The cure rates of the observation group, the acupuncture group and the tuina group reached 50.0%, 20.0% and 16.7% respectively, and the total effective rates reached 93.4%, 70.0% and 73.3% respectively. There were statistical significance between the observation group and the acupuncture and tuina groups (P<0.05); while there was not a statistical difference between the acupuncture group and the tuina group. It was indicated that the therapeutic effect of the observation group was better than that of the acupuncture group and the tuina group. Conclusion: Acupuncture at the bony clefts in combination with tuina therapy is quite effective in the treatment of sprains and strains of metacarpophalangeal (metatarsophalangeal) joints.