中国病理生理杂志
中國病理生理雜誌
중국병리생리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
2001年
5期
392-395
,共4页
高庆春%黄如训%曾进胜%苏镇培%陈颖贤%陈键文
高慶春%黃如訓%曾進勝%囌鎮培%陳穎賢%陳鍵文
고경춘%황여훈%증진성%소진배%진영현%진건문
脑%血流速度%血压%超声检查
腦%血流速度%血壓%超聲檢查
뇌%혈류속도%혈압%초성검사
目的:研究高血压动脉硬化对脑血流自动调节类型的影响,提出脑血流自动调节下限测定的新方法。方法:经颅多普勒超声测定血流速度,同步记录血压,改变血压,绘制脑血流自动调节曲线,并进行分类和确定自动调节的上、下限。同时,自动调节下限也按照临界关闭压(CCP)的理论进行测定。结果:脑血流自动调节类型中,经典型和非经典型降血压中正常鼠为25%和75%,肾血管性高血压大鼠(RHR)为40.55%和54.45%;升血压中正常鼠为76.47%和23.53%,RHR全为经典型。CCP法检测到的自动调节下限正常鼠和RHR分别为(70.88±24.05) mmHg和(107.73±38.82) mmHg,与自动调节曲线测定的结果高度相关(r分别为0.79455和0.81643,P均<0.01),数值相近。结论:高血压动脉硬化除使脑血流自动调节范围上移外,其类型也发生改变;自动调节下限的测定,用TCD按照CCP理论进行,结果可靠,可代替常规方法。
目的:研究高血壓動脈硬化對腦血流自動調節類型的影響,提齣腦血流自動調節下限測定的新方法。方法:經顱多普勒超聲測定血流速度,同步記錄血壓,改變血壓,繪製腦血流自動調節麯線,併進行分類和確定自動調節的上、下限。同時,自動調節下限也按照臨界關閉壓(CCP)的理論進行測定。結果:腦血流自動調節類型中,經典型和非經典型降血壓中正常鼠為25%和75%,腎血管性高血壓大鼠(RHR)為40.55%和54.45%;升血壓中正常鼠為76.47%和23.53%,RHR全為經典型。CCP法檢測到的自動調節下限正常鼠和RHR分彆為(70.88±24.05) mmHg和(107.73±38.82) mmHg,與自動調節麯線測定的結果高度相關(r分彆為0.79455和0.81643,P均<0.01),數值相近。結論:高血壓動脈硬化除使腦血流自動調節範圍上移外,其類型也髮生改變;自動調節下限的測定,用TCD按照CCP理論進行,結果可靠,可代替常規方法。
목적:연구고혈압동맥경화대뇌혈류자동조절류형적영향,제출뇌혈류자동조절하한측정적신방법。방법:경로다보륵초성측정혈류속도,동보기록혈압,개변혈압,회제뇌혈류자동조절곡선,병진행분류화학정자동조절적상、하한。동시,자동조절하한야안조림계관폐압(CCP)적이론진행측정。결과:뇌혈류자동조절류형중,경전형화비경전형강혈압중정상서위25%화75%,신혈관성고혈압대서(RHR)위40.55%화54.45%;승혈압중정상서위76.47%화23.53%,RHR전위경전형。CCP법검측도적자동조절하한정상서화RHR분별위(70.88±24.05) mmHg화(107.73±38.82) mmHg,여자동조절곡선측정적결과고도상관(r분별위0.79455화0.81643,P균<0.01),수치상근。결론:고혈압동맥경화제사뇌혈류자동조절범위상이외,기류형야발생개변;자동조절하한적측정,용TCD안조CCP이론진행,결과가고,가대체상규방법。
AIM:To study the effect of hypertensive arteriosclerosis on cerebral blood flow autoregulation (CBFA), and to introduce a new method to measure the lower limit. METHODS:The blood velocities and blood pressure was recorded simultaneously and the curves of CBFA were analyzed and classified into classical and non-classical pattern. The lower limit were determined by clinical closing pressure (CCP) and the curve CBFA. RESULTS:When the blood pressure was decreasing, the classical and non-classical pattern of the cerebral blood flow autoregulation were 25% and 75% respectively in normal SD rats, while they were 40.55% and 54.45% respectively in renovascular hypertensive rats (RHR). However, when the blood pressure was elevating, the classical and non-classical pattern were 76.47% and 23.53% respectively in SD rats, while they were all classical in RHR. Furthermore, in SD and RHR ras, the lower limits measured by CCP were well in accordance with that measured by CBFA. CONCLUSION:Hypertensive arteriosclerosis could influence the limits and the patterns of cerebral blood flow autoregulation. The lower limit of CBFA can be measured and analyzed by CCP.