CAJ | 학술논문

选择体重20 kg左右的杜枫姜三元杂交猪180头,随机分成4组,每组45头.4个组分别饲喂基础日粮(对照组)、基础日粮+100 mg·kg~(-1)低聚木糖(1组)、基础日粮+150 mg·kg~(-1)低聚木糖(2组)、基础日粮+200 mg·kg~(-1)低聚木糖(3组),探讨不同处理对生长猪免疫功能和血液生化指标的影响.结果表明:与对照组相比,试验1～3组血液单核细胞数分别增加10.7%、37.5%、1.8%;试验组血小板数有提高趋势,且2组显著高于对照组;试验组血清碱性磷酸酶活性比对照组分别提高31.1%、17.2%、33.3%;试验组血清溶菌酶活性也有提高趋势(P>0.05);试验组血清谷草转氨酶活性和葡萄糖含量均高于对照组,但差异不显著;试验组血清尿素氮含量有下降趋势(P>0.05);1、3组血清胆固醇含量显著低于对照组,2组血清胆固醇含量极显著低于对照组.
선택체중20 kg좌우적두풍강삼원잡교저180두,수궤분성4조,매조45두.4개조분별사위기출일량(대조조)、기출일량+100 mg·kg~(-1)저취목당(1조)、기출일량+150 mg·kg~(-1)저취목당(2조)、기출일량+200 mg·kg~(-1)저취목당(3조),탐토불동처리대생장저면역공능화혈액생화지표적영향.결과표명:여대조조상비,시험1～3조혈액단핵세포수분별증가10.7%、37.5%、1.8%;시험조혈소판수유제고추세,차2조현저고우대조조;시험조혈청감성린산매활성비대조조분별제고31.1%、17.2%、33.3%;시험조혈청용균매활성야유제고추세(P>0.05);시험조혈청곡초전안매활성화포도당함량균고우대조조,단차이불현저;시험조혈청뇨소담함량유하강추세(P>0.05);1、3조혈청담고순함량현저저우대조조,2조혈청담고순함량겁현저저우대조조.
180 crossbred growing pigs with body weight of 20 kg were randomly allocated to four groups,45 pigs per group.The pigs were fed with basic diet,basic diet plus 100 mg·kg~1 xylooligosaccharide,basic diet plus 150 mg·kg~(-1)xylooligosaccharide,basic diet plus 200 mg·kg~(-1) xylooligosaccharide respectively to study the effects of xylooligosaccharide on immunity and serum biochemical index of growing pigs.The results showed that:the serum monocyte in treatment groups was increased by 10.7%,37.5%,1.8% respectively compared to the control group;the xylooligosaccharide had the trend of improving the serum haematoblast,and the haematoblast of group 3 was significant higher than control group;the activity of serum alkaline phosphatase in treatment groups was increased by 31.1%,17.2%,33.3% respectively compared to the control group;and the activity of serum lysozyme was increased by the supplementation of xylooligosaccharide,but had no significant difference;the xylooligosaccharide had the trend of improving the activity of serum aspartate aminotransferase,the quantity of glucose and decreasing the serum urea nitrogen;the quantity of serum cholesterol in group 2,4 was significantly lower than control group,the quantity of serum cholesterol in group 1 was significantly lower than control group.