中华医学杂志
中華醫學雜誌
중화의학잡지
National Medical Journal of China
2009年
15期
1057-1059
,共3页
齐大亮%杨彦卓%刘竹君%王庆生%辛亮%崔焱%乔宇峰%冯奎
齊大亮%楊彥卓%劉竹君%王慶生%辛亮%崔焱%喬宇峰%馮奎
제대량%양언탁%류죽군%왕경생%신량%최염%교우봉%풍규
癌,非小细胞肺%卡铂%药物疗法%联合%重组人血管内皮抑素
癌,非小細胞肺%卡鉑%藥物療法%聯閤%重組人血管內皮抑素
암,비소세포폐%잡박%약물요법%연합%중조인혈관내피억소
Carcinoma,non-small-cell lung%Carboplatin%Drug therapy,combination%rh-endostatin
目的 探讨重组人血管内皮抑索(恩度,EndostarTM)联合多西紫杉醇和卡铂(TP)方案术后辅助治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效及对外周血标志物的影响.方法 采用重组人血管内皮抑素联合TP方案(治疗组)和单用TP方案(对照组)治疗Ⅰb-Ⅲa期的NSCLC术后患者各18例,观察近期疗效、并检测治疗前后外周血循环血管内皮细胞(CEC)数量及肿瘤标志物CEA、NSE、CYFR21-1的水平.结果 外周血CEC及CEA、NSE、CYFR21-1治疗后均有下降,第4周期治疗后治疗组的CEC和NSE与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.016和P=0.013).治疗组无病生存时间延长,但尚无统计学意义.复发、转移患者CEC明显升高,经治疗病情好转后下降.结论 重组人血管内皮抑素联合TP方案术后辅助治疗NSCLC较单纯化疗显示近期疗效上的优势、长期生存结果值得期待.CEC可能是一个较好的预测疗效的指标.
目的 探討重組人血管內皮抑索(恩度,EndostarTM)聯閤多西紫杉醇和卡鉑(TP)方案術後輔助治療非小細胞肺癌(NSCLC)的療效及對外週血標誌物的影響.方法 採用重組人血管內皮抑素聯閤TP方案(治療組)和單用TP方案(對照組)治療Ⅰb-Ⅲa期的NSCLC術後患者各18例,觀察近期療效、併檢測治療前後外週血循環血管內皮細胞(CEC)數量及腫瘤標誌物CEA、NSE、CYFR21-1的水平.結果 外週血CEC及CEA、NSE、CYFR21-1治療後均有下降,第4週期治療後治療組的CEC和NSE與對照組比較差異有統計學意義(P=0.016和P=0.013).治療組無病生存時間延長,但尚無統計學意義.複髮、轉移患者CEC明顯升高,經治療病情好轉後下降.結論 重組人血管內皮抑素聯閤TP方案術後輔助治療NSCLC較單純化療顯示近期療效上的優勢、長期生存結果值得期待.CEC可能是一箇較好的預測療效的指標.
목적 탐토중조인혈관내피억색(은도,EndostarTM)연합다서자삼순화잡박(TP)방안술후보조치료비소세포폐암(NSCLC)적료효급대외주혈표지물적영향.방법 채용중조인혈관내피억소연합TP방안(치료조)화단용TP방안(대조조)치료Ⅰb-Ⅲa기적NSCLC술후환자각18례,관찰근기료효、병검측치료전후외주혈순배혈관내피세포(CEC)수량급종류표지물CEA、NSE、CYFR21-1적수평.결과 외주혈CEC급CEA、NSE、CYFR21-1치료후균유하강,제4주기치료후치료조적CEC화NSE여대조조비교차이유통계학의의(P=0.016화P=0.013).치료조무병생존시간연장,단상무통계학의의.복발、전이환자CEC명현승고,경치료병정호전후하강.결론 중조인혈관내피억소연합TP방안술후보조치료NSCLC교단순화료현시근기료효상적우세、장기생존결과치득기대.CEC가능시일개교호적예측료효적지표.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of EndostarTM (rh-endostatin,YH-16) combined with docetaxel and carboplatin (TP)regimen for the adjuvant treatment of non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) and its impact on circulating blood markers. Methods 36 patients with stage Ⅰ b-Ⅲ a postoperative NSCLC, were randomly divided into the treatment group, EndostarTM plus TP regimen, and the control group, TP regimen only, respectively. DFS and toxicities of patients were observed. The numbers of CEC and the levels of tumor marker CEA, NSE and CYFR21-1 were measured. Results The numbers of CEC and the levels of CEA, NSE and CYFR21-1 decreased after treatment. There were significant differences in GEC and NSE between treatment group and control group after four cycles of treatment, respectively (P = 0.016 and 0.013). Disease-free survival time (DFS) was longer in treatment group than control group but without significant difference. CEC was significantly increased in recurrent and metastasis cases and decreased after effective treatment Conclusion EndostarTM combined with TP regimen seem to be superior to TP alone in some short term index for the treatment of postoperative NSCLC even though long-term survival is still anticipated. CEC, as a biomarker, may be useful in predicting the efficacy of the such synergistic treatment.