中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2011年
32期
3845-3848
,共4页
李运梅%夏炳成%王美莲%韦梅英%韦丽玲%陈荣姣%文玉先
李運梅%夏炳成%王美蓮%韋梅英%韋麗玲%陳榮姣%文玉先
리운매%하병성%왕미련%위매영%위려령%진영교%문옥선
血液透析%肾衰竭%家庭护理%生活满意度%社区
血液透析%腎衰竭%傢庭護理%生活滿意度%社區
혈액투석%신쇠갈%가정호리%생활만의도%사구
Hemodialysis%Renal failure%Home nursing%Life satisfaction%Community
目的 探讨家庭护理干预对血液透析患者生活满意度的影响.方法 将在我院进行血液透析的128例患者随机分为实验组和对照组,每组64例,对照组采用常规护理方法护理,实验组进行家庭护理干预.采用Neugarten生活满意度量表调查患者满意度,比较两组患者的生活满意度、营养指标、肾功能情况.结果 干预前两组患者的生活满意度量表评分、尿素氮、肌酐、白蛋白、血红蛋白比较差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05)；干预后实验组生活满意度量表评分(20.07±1.39)分,生活满意度指数A量表评分为(17.35 ±1.04)分,生活满意度指数B量表评分为(18.49±1.10)分,对照组分别为(14.71±0.81),(15.00±0.75),(15.49±0.85)分,差异均有统计学意义(t=22.43,2.10,10.30;P ＜0.05)；干预后实验组尿素氮、肌酐、白蛋白、血红蛋白情况均优于对照组(P＜0.05).结论 家庭护理干预能提高社区血液透析患者的生活满意度,从而提高其生活质量.
目的 探討傢庭護理榦預對血液透析患者生活滿意度的影響.方法 將在我院進行血液透析的128例患者隨機分為實驗組和對照組,每組64例,對照組採用常規護理方法護理,實驗組進行傢庭護理榦預.採用Neugarten生活滿意度量錶調查患者滿意度,比較兩組患者的生活滿意度、營養指標、腎功能情況.結果 榦預前兩組患者的生活滿意度量錶評分、尿素氮、肌酐、白蛋白、血紅蛋白比較差異均無統計學意義(P＞0.05)；榦預後實驗組生活滿意度量錶評分(20.07±1.39)分,生活滿意度指數A量錶評分為(17.35 ±1.04)分,生活滿意度指數B量錶評分為(18.49±1.10)分,對照組分彆為(14.71±0.81),(15.00±0.75),(15.49±0.85)分,差異均有統計學意義(t=22.43,2.10,10.30;P ＜0.05)；榦預後實驗組尿素氮、肌酐、白蛋白、血紅蛋白情況均優于對照組(P＜0.05).結論 傢庭護理榦預能提高社區血液透析患者的生活滿意度,從而提高其生活質量.
목적 탐토가정호리간예대혈액투석환자생활만의도적영향.방법 장재아원진행혈액투석적128례환자수궤분위실험조화대조조,매조64례,대조조채용상규호리방법호리,실험조진행가정호리간예.채용Neugarten생활만의도량표조사환자만의도,비교량조환자적생활만의도、영양지표、신공능정황.결과 간예전량조환자적생활만의도량표평분、뇨소담、기항、백단백、혈홍단백비교차이균무통계학의의(P＞0.05)；간예후실험조생활만의도량표평분(20.07±1.39)분,생활만의도지수A량표평분위(17.35 ±1.04)분,생활만의도지수B량표평분위(18.49±1.10)분,대조조분별위(14.71±0.81),(15.00±0.75),(15.49±0.85)분,차이균유통계학의의(t=22.43,2.10,10.30;P ＜0.05)；간예후실험조뇨소담、기항、백단백、혈홍단백정황균우우대조조(P＜0.05).결론 가정호리간예능제고사구혈액투석환자적생활만의도,종이제고기생활질량.
Objective To investigate the effect of family nursing intervention on life satisfaction in patients with hemodialysis.Methods 128 patients with hemodialysis in our hospital were randomly divided into experimental group and control group,64 cases in each group.Traditional health nursing methods were used in control group and home nursing intervention was carried out in experimental group.Patients' life satisfaction in the two groups was investigated by Neugarten' life satisfaction scale,the life satisfaction,nutrition and kidney function were compared between the two groups.Results The life satisfaction score,blood urea nitrogen,Creatinine,Albumin,hemoglobin in the two groups before intervention were similar ( P ＞ 0.05 ).After intervention,the life satisfaction score,life satisfaction index A,life satisfaction index B were (20.07 ± 1.39),( 17.35 ± 1.04) and ( 18.49 ± 1.10) in experimental group,but ( 14.71 ± 0.81 ),( 15.00 ± 0.75 ) and (15.49 ±0.85) in sequence in control group,there were statistically significant differences between the two groups(t =22.43,2.10,10.30; P ＜ 0.05 ),blood urea nitrogen,Creatinine,Albumin,hemoglobin in experimental group after intervention were better than that in control group ( P ＜ 0.05 ).Conclusions Home nursing intervention can improve life satisfaction of patients with hemodialysis in community then it can improve the quality of life.
