城市规划学刊
城市規劃學刊
성시규화학간
URBAN PLANNING FORUM
2010年
2期
49-56
,共8页
交通方式%空间可达性差异%南京
交通方式%空間可達性差異%南京
교통방식%공간가체성차이%남경
travel modes%modal accessibility gap%Nanjing Metropolitan Area
将南京都市区划分为5个圈层和566个交通小区,采用南京都市区2006年土地使用现状数据,用区位熵采衡量社会经济发展机会数,根据机会累积可达性测度方法,计算了20、40和60min三种阀值下的自行车、小汽车和公共汽车的空间可达性.结果显示:①在当前建成环境下,交通方式的空间可达性呈同心圆模式;②小汽车相对于公共交通和自行车的可达性优势非常明显;③尽管公共交通在长距离或长时间出行中,相比自行车有一定优势,但是在近距离或短时间出行中,可达性优势很微弱;④在正处于快速城市化地区的中心城圈层和外围圈层,公共交通的可迭性小于自行车,说明当前的公共交通设施供给与土地开发模式不利于公共交通方式的发展.
將南京都市區劃分為5箇圈層和566箇交通小區,採用南京都市區2006年土地使用現狀數據,用區位熵採衡量社會經濟髮展機會數,根據機會纍積可達性測度方法,計算瞭20、40和60min三種閥值下的自行車、小汽車和公共汽車的空間可達性.結果顯示:①在噹前建成環境下,交通方式的空間可達性呈同心圓模式;②小汽車相對于公共交通和自行車的可達性優勢非常明顯;③儘管公共交通在長距離或長時間齣行中,相比自行車有一定優勢,但是在近距離或短時間齣行中,可達性優勢很微弱;④在正處于快速城市化地區的中心城圈層和外圍圈層,公共交通的可迭性小于自行車,說明噹前的公共交通設施供給與土地開髮模式不利于公共交通方式的髮展.
장남경도시구화분위5개권층화566개교통소구,채용남경도시구2006년토지사용현상수거,용구위적채형량사회경제발전궤회수,근거궤회루적가체성측도방법,계산료20、40화60min삼충벌치하적자행차、소기차화공공기차적공간가체성.결과현시:①재당전건성배경하,교통방식적공간가체성정동심원모식;②소기차상대우공공교통화자행차적가체성우세비상명현;③진관공공교통재장거리혹장시간출행중,상비자행차유일정우세,단시재근거리혹단시간출행중,가체성우세흔미약;④재정처우쾌속성시화지구적중심성권층화외위권층,공공교통적가질성소우자행차,설명당전적공공교통설시공급여토지개발모식불리우공공교통방식적발전.
The Nanjing metropolitan Area is divided into 5 zones and 566 TAZs in this paper. Using the original land-use data in 2006, the Location Entropy Indi-cator (LEI) of residential, industry and commercial land are calculated as the proxy of opportunities. The modal accessibility of bicycle, car and urban transit are mea-sured based on the method of cumulative-opportunity under three assumptions of isochrones time: 20, 40 and 60 minutes. The result shows that: ①under the exist-ing built environment, the spatial structure of the modal accessibility displays a con-centric zonal pattern; ②the strength of car accessibility relative to bicycle and urban transit is apparent; ③comparing the modal accessibility of urban transit and bicycle, the strength of urban transit accessibility is relatively high when the isochrone time is assumed to be 40 or 60 minutes, but the strength is weak when the isochrone time is assumed to be 20 minutes; ④In the central city zone and periphery zone where rapid urbanization is observed, the accessibility of urban transit is lower than the bicycle. It is suggested that the existing public transportation infrastructure and the mode of land development is not conducive to the development of urban tran-sit.