国际流行病学传染病学杂志
國際流行病學傳染病學雜誌
국제류행병학전염병학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE
2009年
2期
87-89
,共3页
肝硬化%医院感染%抗菌药
肝硬化%醫院感染%抗菌藥
간경화%의원감염%항균약
Liver cirrhosis%Nosocomial infection%Antibiotics
目的 探讨预防性抗生素应用对肝硬化并发急性上消化道出血患者治疗及预后的影响.方法 将96例肝硬化并发上消化道出血患者分为预防性抗生素应用组(预防组)和对照组两组.预防组患者入院后除常规治疗外,给予抗生素预防性应用(头孢曲松或氟喹诺酮类);对照组未预防性应用抗生素,统计两组在医院感染率、再出血率、多脏器功能衰竭发生率和病死率的差异.结果 预防组医院感染率18.0%,对照组为41.3%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).医院感染者再出血率为53.6%,高于无感染者的13.2%(P<0.01),表明医院感染与再出血率有关.预防组多脏器功能衰竭发生率22.0%,对照组发生率50.0%(P<0.01).预防组死亡率为16.0%,低于对照组的37.0%(P<0.05).结论 肝硬化并发上消化道出血患者预防性抗生素应用,可降低医院感染发生率和再出血率,提高患者的生存率.
目的 探討預防性抗生素應用對肝硬化併髮急性上消化道齣血患者治療及預後的影響.方法 將96例肝硬化併髮上消化道齣血患者分為預防性抗生素應用組(預防組)和對照組兩組.預防組患者入院後除常規治療外,給予抗生素預防性應用(頭孢麯鬆或氟喹諾酮類);對照組未預防性應用抗生素,統計兩組在醫院感染率、再齣血率、多髒器功能衰竭髮生率和病死率的差異.結果 預防組醫院感染率18.0%,對照組為41.3%,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).醫院感染者再齣血率為53.6%,高于無感染者的13.2%(P<0.01),錶明醫院感染與再齣血率有關.預防組多髒器功能衰竭髮生率22.0%,對照組髮生率50.0%(P<0.01).預防組死亡率為16.0%,低于對照組的37.0%(P<0.05).結論 肝硬化併髮上消化道齣血患者預防性抗生素應用,可降低醫院感染髮生率和再齣血率,提高患者的生存率.
목적 탐토예방성항생소응용대간경화병발급성상소화도출혈환자치료급예후적영향.방법 장96례간경화병발상소화도출혈환자분위예방성항생소응용조(예방조)화대조조량조.예방조환자입원후제상규치료외,급여항생소예방성응용(두포곡송혹불규낙동류);대조조미예방성응용항생소,통계량조재의원감염솔、재출혈솔、다장기공능쇠갈발생솔화병사솔적차이.결과 예방조의원감염솔18.0%,대조조위41.3%,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).의원감염자재출혈솔위53.6%,고우무감염자적13.2%(P<0.01),표명의원감염여재출혈솔유관.예방조다장기공능쇠갈발생솔22.0%,대조조발생솔50.0%(P<0.01).예방조사망솔위16.0%,저우대조조적37.0%(P<0.05).결론 간경화병발상소화도출혈환자예방성항생소응용,가강저의원감염발생솔화재출혈솔,제고환자적생존솔.
Objective To investigate the effect of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in liver cirrhosis patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Methods A case-control study was employed. A total of 96 liver cirrhosis patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage were included. The patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis were defined as prophylaxis group(50 patients), the remains defined as control group(46 patients). The incidence of nosocomial infections, rehaemorrhagia, multiple organ failure and mortality were analysed between the two groups. Results The incidence of nosocomial infections in patients from control group was higher than that in patients from prophylaxis group(41.3% : 18.0%, P < 0.05). The rebleeding was more refrequent in patients with nosocomial infections(53.6% : 13.2%, P < 0.01 ). The patients from control group had higher mortality compared with those from prophylaxis group(37.0% : 16.0%, P < 0.05 ). Conclusions In hver cirrhosis patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, a prophylactic treatment with systemiatic antibiotics is very much effective in preventing nosocomial infections, decreasing rehaemorrhagia and elevating survival rate.