中国超声医学杂志
中國超聲醫學雜誌
중국초성의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE
2009年
10期
947-950
,共4页
安婷婷%窦新颖%苏雁欣%姜伶%田家玮
安婷婷%竇新穎%囌雁訢%薑伶%田傢瑋
안정정%두신영%소안흔%강령%전가위
超声积分%乳腺肿块%鉴别诊断
超聲積分%乳腺腫塊%鑒彆診斷
초성적분%유선종괴%감별진단
Ultrasonic scores%Solid breast masses%Differentiation
目的 探讨超声积分法在乳腺实性肿块良、恶性中的鉴别诊断价值.方法 选择经手术病理证实的125例136个乳腺实性肿块,常规记录全部乳腺肿块的超声征象,并给予赋值评分,计算每个肿块的总积分.根据病变的评分值将其分类,与病理结果对照,采用受试者工作特性曲线(ROC曲线)评价超声积分的诊断价值.结果 由肿块的形态、边界、有无包膜、纵横比例、后方回声、内部回声、有无微钙化及血流显示8项指标综合而成的肿块的总积分有差异,恶性肿块得分高于良性肿块;ROC曲线下的面积Az=0.915,其95%可信区间为(0.863、0.968).总积分13.5分作为临界值,其敏感性、特异性分别为84.9%、88.9%.结论 超声积分法能半定量分析乳腺实性肿块的二维及彩色多普勒超声征象,可以提高超声诊断的准确率.
目的 探討超聲積分法在乳腺實性腫塊良、噁性中的鑒彆診斷價值.方法 選擇經手術病理證實的125例136箇乳腺實性腫塊,常規記錄全部乳腺腫塊的超聲徵象,併給予賦值評分,計算每箇腫塊的總積分.根據病變的評分值將其分類,與病理結果對照,採用受試者工作特性麯線(ROC麯線)評價超聲積分的診斷價值.結果 由腫塊的形態、邊界、有無包膜、縱橫比例、後方迴聲、內部迴聲、有無微鈣化及血流顯示8項指標綜閤而成的腫塊的總積分有差異,噁性腫塊得分高于良性腫塊;ROC麯線下的麵積Az=0.915,其95%可信區間為(0.863、0.968).總積分13.5分作為臨界值,其敏感性、特異性分彆為84.9%、88.9%.結論 超聲積分法能半定量分析乳腺實性腫塊的二維及綵色多普勒超聲徵象,可以提高超聲診斷的準確率.
목적 탐토초성적분법재유선실성종괴량、악성중적감별진단개치.방법 선택경수술병리증실적125례136개유선실성종괴,상규기록전부유선종괴적초성정상,병급여부치평분,계산매개종괴적총적분.근거병변적평분치장기분류,여병리결과대조,채용수시자공작특성곡선(ROC곡선)평개초성적분적진단개치.결과 유종괴적형태、변계、유무포막、종횡비례、후방회성、내부회성、유무미개화급혈류현시8항지표종합이성적종괴적총적분유차이,악성종괴득분고우량성종괴;ROC곡선하적면적Az=0.915,기95%가신구간위(0.863、0.968).총적분13.5분작위림계치,기민감성、특이성분별위84.9%、88.9%.결론 초성적분법능반정량분석유선실성종괴적이유급채색다보륵초성정상,가이제고초성진단적준학솔.
Objective To investigate the value of differentiation diagnosis of solid breast masses by ultrasonic scores in 2D and CDFI features.Methods 136 solid breast masses of 125 cases had been diagnosed by pathology.All the ultrasonographic features of breast masses were reported routinely by 2D high frequency Ultrasonography(HFU)and the shape,margin,capsule,the ratio of length-to-width,internal echoes,posterior acoustic features,microcalcification and blood flow of solid breast masses were analyzed and graded.The total scores for each lesion were calculated.The masses were classified according to their scores compared with pathology results.A receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to assess the diagnostic value of ultrasonic scores.Results There were differences between the total scores of malignant and benign lesions.The former was higher than the latter.The area under the ROC curve was 0.915 and its 95% confidence interval was (0.863,0.968).The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 84.9% and 88.9% while the cut-off value was 13.5.Conclusions Ultrasonic scores could be used to analyze the features of 2D and CDFI of solid breast masses objectively and semi-quantitatively and increase the diagnostic accuracy of solid breast masses in differentiation between benign and malignant ones.