中国综合临床
中國綜閤臨床
중국종합림상
CLINICAL MEDICINE OF CHINA
2012年
10期
1087-1089
,共3页
石洋%庞野%张锡朋%李大祥%李玉玮
石洋%龐野%張錫朋%李大祥%李玉瑋
석양%방야%장석붕%리대상%리옥위
直肠癌%外科手术%并发症%生存率
直腸癌%外科手術%併髮癥%生存率
직장암%외과수술%병발증%생존솔
Rectal cancer%Surgery%Complications%Survival rates
目的 评价经肛门局部切除治疗低位直肠癌的效果.方法 回顾性分析我院2003-2006年49例低位直肠癌经肛门行局部切除术患者(局部切除术组)的临床资料,其中T1期37例,T2期12例;以45例行根治术的Ⅰ期直肠癌患者作为对照(根治术组),其中T1期11例,T2期34例.将两组患者的手术并发症发生率、5年复发率、5年生存率进行对比分析.结果 局部切除术组并发症发生率为4.1% (2/49),根治术组为15.6% (7/45),两组比较差异有统计学意义(x2=4.69,P<0.05).局部切除术组患者5年生存率为97.9%,根治术组患者为95.6%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(x2=0.439,P>0.05).局部切除术组中T2期患者术后复发率为33.3% (4/12),高于根治术组T2期患者术后复发率(5.9%,2/34),两者比较差异有统计学意义(x2=5.89,P<0.05);低分化癌患者术后均转移复发.结论 对于T1期直肠癌,经肛门局部切除是合理选择,而T2期直肠癌及低分化肿瘤不宜单纯采用局部切除术.
目的 評價經肛門跼部切除治療低位直腸癌的效果.方法 迴顧性分析我院2003-2006年49例低位直腸癌經肛門行跼部切除術患者(跼部切除術組)的臨床資料,其中T1期37例,T2期12例;以45例行根治術的Ⅰ期直腸癌患者作為對照(根治術組),其中T1期11例,T2期34例.將兩組患者的手術併髮癥髮生率、5年複髮率、5年生存率進行對比分析.結果 跼部切除術組併髮癥髮生率為4.1% (2/49),根治術組為15.6% (7/45),兩組比較差異有統計學意義(x2=4.69,P<0.05).跼部切除術組患者5年生存率為97.9%,根治術組患者為95.6%,兩組比較差異無統計學意義(x2=0.439,P>0.05).跼部切除術組中T2期患者術後複髮率為33.3% (4/12),高于根治術組T2期患者術後複髮率(5.9%,2/34),兩者比較差異有統計學意義(x2=5.89,P<0.05);低分化癌患者術後均轉移複髮.結論 對于T1期直腸癌,經肛門跼部切除是閤理選擇,而T2期直腸癌及低分化腫瘤不宜單純採用跼部切除術.
목적 평개경항문국부절제치료저위직장암적효과.방법 회고성분석아원2003-2006년49례저위직장암경항문행국부절제술환자(국부절제술조)적림상자료,기중T1기37례,T2기12례;이45례행근치술적Ⅰ기직장암환자작위대조(근치술조),기중T1기11례,T2기34례.장량조환자적수술병발증발생솔、5년복발솔、5년생존솔진행대비분석.결과 국부절제술조병발증발생솔위4.1% (2/49),근치술조위15.6% (7/45),량조비교차이유통계학의의(x2=4.69,P<0.05).국부절제술조환자5년생존솔위97.9%,근치술조환자위95.6%,량조비교차이무통계학의의(x2=0.439,P>0.05).국부절제술조중T2기환자술후복발솔위33.3% (4/12),고우근치술조T2기환자술후복발솔(5.9%,2/34),량자비교차이유통계학의의(x2=5.89,P<0.05);저분화암환자술후균전이복발.결론 대우T1기직장암,경항문국부절제시합리선택,이T2기직장암급저분화종류불의단순채용국부절제술.
Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of transanal local excision in the treatment of low rectal cancer.Methods The data of 49 cases of low rectal cancer patients treated by transanal local excision (group A,37 cases of T1 patients and 12 cases of T2 patients) were reviewed retrospectively,and compared with the group of 45 cases treated by radical resection( group B,11 cases of T1 patients and 34 cases of T2 patients).The 5-year survival rates,recurrence rates and postoperative complications between the two groups were compared.Results The incidence of postoperative complications in group A was significantly lower than that in group B(4.1% vs 15.6%,x2 =4.69,P <0.05 ).The 5-year survival rate of group A was 97.9% and the 5-year survival rate of group B was 95.6%.There was no significantly statistical difference on the 5-year survival rate between the two groups( x2 =0.439,P > 0.05 ).But for the T2 patients,the recurrence rates in group A was 33.3%,which was significantly higher than the T2 patients in group B(5.9% ) ( x2 =5.89,P <0.05 ).All patients with low histopathological grade tumor in group A showed postoperative recurrence and metastasis.Conclusion Transanal local excision with a rigid criteria can get good curative effect in the T1 patients,but not suitable for the T2 patients or patients with low histopathological grade tumor.