西安医科大学学报
西安醫科大學學報
서안의과대학학보
JOURNAL OF XI'AN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2000年
6期
540-542
,共3页
党亚萍%马爱群%郑小璞%杨爱民%肖江%高信耀
黨亞萍%馬愛群%鄭小璞%楊愛民%肖江%高信耀
당아평%마애군%정소박%양애민%초강%고신요
核素心血池显像%心功能%相关分析
覈素心血池顯像%心功能%相關分析
핵소심혈지현상%심공능%상관분석
gated cardiac blood-pool image%clinical heart function class%relative analysis
目的应用门控核素心血池显像检测手段对临床心功能状态的判断提供一客观、准确的量化指标。方法选取我院393例因各种心脏疾病行门控核素心血池检查住院患者,用SPOPHY DS7型SPECT,FRANKFURT门处理程序,获得左室各功能参数,依据WHO心功能分级标准,将心功能分为1~4级。结果临床心功能不同级别间心血池显像所获各指标值明显不同,心功能1~4级,GEF、PER、PFR呈依次减低趋势,EDV及PS依次增大;GEF值小于36%时心功能处于失代偿期者占71.3%,当GEF值小于26%时多数心功能处于3~4级,当GEF值为26%~35%时,心功能多处于2~3级,当GEF值大于36%时心功能多处于1~2级。同时表明:心血池显像所获各项参数之间相关非常显著,且与临床心功能分级的相关性良好,依次为EDV、GEF、PER、PFR、PS。结论核素心血池显像所获各项参数能够直接、客观、准确反映出临床心功能状态,同时提供室壁运动、相位分析等其他指标。
目的應用門控覈素心血池顯像檢測手段對臨床心功能狀態的判斷提供一客觀、準確的量化指標。方法選取我院393例因各種心髒疾病行門控覈素心血池檢查住院患者,用SPOPHY DS7型SPECT,FRANKFURT門處理程序,穫得左室各功能參數,依據WHO心功能分級標準,將心功能分為1~4級。結果臨床心功能不同級彆間心血池顯像所穫各指標值明顯不同,心功能1~4級,GEF、PER、PFR呈依次減低趨勢,EDV及PS依次增大;GEF值小于36%時心功能處于失代償期者佔71.3%,噹GEF值小于26%時多數心功能處于3~4級,噹GEF值為26%~35%時,心功能多處于2~3級,噹GEF值大于36%時心功能多處于1~2級。同時錶明:心血池顯像所穫各項參數之間相關非常顯著,且與臨床心功能分級的相關性良好,依次為EDV、GEF、PER、PFR、PS。結論覈素心血池顯像所穫各項參數能夠直接、客觀、準確反映齣臨床心功能狀態,同時提供室壁運動、相位分析等其他指標。
목적응용문공핵소심혈지현상검측수단대림상심공능상태적판단제공일객관、준학적양화지표。방법선취아원393례인각충심장질병행문공핵소심혈지검사주원환자,용SPOPHY DS7형SPECT,FRANKFURT문처리정서,획득좌실각공능삼수,의거WHO심공능분급표준,장심공능분위1~4급。결과림상심공능불동급별간심혈지현상소획각지표치명현불동,심공능1~4급,GEF、PER、PFR정의차감저추세,EDV급PS의차증대;GEF치소우36%시심공능처우실대상기자점71.3%,당GEF치소우26%시다수심공능처우3~4급,당GEF치위26%~35%시,심공능다처우2~3급,당GEF치대우36%시심공능다처우1~2급。동시표명:심혈지현상소획각항삼수지간상관비상현저,차여림상심공능분급적상관성량호,의차위EDV、GEF、PER、PFR、PS。결론핵소심혈지현상소획각항삼수능구직접、객관、준학반영출림상심공능상태,동시제공실벽운동、상위분석등기타지표。
Objective In order to use the gated cardiac blood-pool imaging well and truly judge clinical heart function. Methods 393 patients with various heart diseases were examined by the gated cardiac blood pool imaging using Sophy DS7 SPECT. The FRANKFURT processing was utilized to obtain the left ventricle function index. Heart function level was through divided into 4 classes according to WHO standard. Results The left ventricular function parameters had significant difference in different clinical heart function level. When heart function levels were 1 to 4 classes, GEF, PER,PFR were ordinal reduced, EDV, PS was ordinal increased. When GEF value was less than36%, decompensation of heart function was 71.3%. When GEF was less than 26% ,most patient's heart function were located 3~4 class. When GEF was 26 %~35 %, heart function was 2~3 classesin most cases. When GEF was more than 36 %, clinical function most was situated 1~2 class. There were significant relativity between the ventricular function parameters and clinical heart function class, devolution was EDV, GEF, PER, PFR, PS. Conclusion The left ventricular blood-pool imaging can well and truly reflect clinical heart function and offer ventricular wall action as well as phase analysis.