安徽农业科学
安徽農業科學
안휘농업과학
JOURNAL OF ANHUI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
2009年
22期
10470-10471,10502
,共3页
李艳春%杜国强%师校欣%李明媛
李豔春%杜國彊%師校訢%李明媛
리염춘%두국강%사교흔%리명원
葡萄%光合速率%气孔导度%细胞间CO2浓度
葡萄%光閤速率%氣孔導度%細胞間CO2濃度
포도%광합속솔%기공도도%세포간CO2농도
Grape%Photosynthesis rate%Stomata conductance%Intercellular CO2 concentration
[目的] 研究摘叶、铺膜以及摘叶结合铺膜处理对赤霞珠葡萄叶片光和性能的影响.[方法] 以7年生赤霞珠葡萄为试材,设摘除果穗周围叶片、树冠下铺银色反光膜、树冠下铺银色反光膜+摘叶3个处理,以常规管理株为对照,分别测定4个处理的叶片光合速率(Pn)、气孔导度(Gs)和细胞间隙CO2浓度(Ci)以及光照强度.[结果] 摘叶和铺膜处理均可提高葡萄结果部位叶片的光合速率,其中摘叶处理比对照提高28.3%,铺膜处理比对照提高72.6%;铺膜+摘叶处理相对于铺膜或摘叶处理并未表现显著的加和效应,摘叶和铺膜处理对叶片气孔导度有一定影响,以摘叶处理影响较大.不同时期各处理叶片细胞间CO2浓度存在一定差异.[结论] 综合考虑,铺膜效果优于摘叶处理.
[目的] 研究摘葉、鋪膜以及摘葉結閤鋪膜處理對赤霞珠葡萄葉片光和性能的影響.[方法] 以7年生赤霞珠葡萄為試材,設摘除果穗週圍葉片、樹冠下鋪銀色反光膜、樹冠下鋪銀色反光膜+摘葉3箇處理,以常規管理株為對照,分彆測定4箇處理的葉片光閤速率(Pn)、氣孔導度(Gs)和細胞間隙CO2濃度(Ci)以及光照彊度.[結果] 摘葉和鋪膜處理均可提高葡萄結果部位葉片的光閤速率,其中摘葉處理比對照提高28.3%,鋪膜處理比對照提高72.6%;鋪膜+摘葉處理相對于鋪膜或摘葉處理併未錶現顯著的加和效應,摘葉和鋪膜處理對葉片氣孔導度有一定影響,以摘葉處理影響較大.不同時期各處理葉片細胞間CO2濃度存在一定差異.[結論] 綜閤攷慮,鋪膜效果優于摘葉處理.
[목적] 연구적협、포막이급적협결합포막처리대적하주포도협편광화성능적영향.[방법] 이7년생적하주포도위시재,설적제과수주위협편、수관하포은색반광막、수관하포은색반광막+적협3개처리,이상규관리주위대조,분별측정4개처리적협편광합속솔(Pn)、기공도도(Gs)화세포간극CO2농도(Ci)이급광조강도.[결과] 적협화포막처리균가제고포도결과부위협편적광합속솔,기중적협처리비대조제고28.3%,포막처리비대조제고72.6%;포막+적협처리상대우포막혹적협처리병미표현현저적가화효응,적협화포막처리대협편기공도도유일정영향,이적협처리영향교대.불동시기각처리협편세포간CO2농도존재일정차이.[결론] 종합고필,포막효과우우적협처리.
[Objective] The aim was to study the effect of picking leaves,paving reflecting film and leaf picking combined with paving reflecting film on photosynthetic characteristics of leaves of Cabernet sauvignon grapes. [Method] With 7-year-old C. sauvignon grapes as the test materials,3 treatments of picking the leaves around the fruit,paving the silver reflecting film and leaf picking combined with paving reflecting film were set up and the conventional management plants were taken as the CK. The leaf photosynthetic rate (Pn),stomatal conductance (Gs),intercellular CO2 concn(Ci). and light intensity of 4 treatments were measured,resp.. [Result] The treatments of picking leaves and paving reflecting film all increased the Pn of leaves in setting fruit position of grapes. Compared with CK,Pn of leaves with picking leaf treatment was increased by 28.3%,and that with paving reflecting film treatment was increased by 72.6%. Compared with the treatment of paving reflecting film or picking leaves,there was no significant additive effect with paving film + picking leaves treatment. There was a certain influence of paving reflecting film and picking leaves treatment on leaf Gs and the effect of picking leaves was great. There were some differences on the Ci. of leaves at different times in all treatments. [Conclusion] In general,paving reflecting film had a better effect than that of leaf picking.