CAJ | 학술논문

　　目的观察气动弹道式体外冲击波治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛的临床疗效。方法66例慢性非特异性下腰痛患者随机分为治疗组和对照组(治疗组脱落1例，对照组脱落2例)，治疗组患者使用气动弹道式体外冲击波治疗，对照组患者使用热磁治疗，共2周。治疗前后采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和指地距离(FFD)进行评定。结果两组治疗后VAS评分及FFD均改善(P<0.05)，治疗后VAS评分及FFD的差值组间比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论气动弹道式体外冲击波对慢性非特异性下腰痛的疗效优于热磁疗法。
　　목적관찰기동탄도식체외충격파치료만성비특이성하요통적림상료효。방법66례만성비특이성하요통환자수궤분위치료조화대조조(치료조탈락1례，대조조탈락2례)，치료조환자사용기동탄도식체외충격파치료，대조조환자사용열자치료，공2주。치료전후채용동통시각모의평분(VAS)화지지거리(FFD)진행평정。결과량조치료후VAS평분급FFD균개선(P<0.05)，치료후VAS평분급FFD적차치조간비교유현저성차이(P<0.05)。결론기동탄도식체외충격파대만성비특이성하요통적료효우우열자요법。
Objective To observe the clinical effect of pneumatically ballistic extracorporeal shockwave on chronic nonspecific low back pain. Methods 66 cases with chronic nonspecific low back pain were randomly divided into treatment group (n=33) and control group (n=33). There were 1 case drop-out in the treatment group and 2 in the control group. The treatment group accepted pneumatically ballistic extracorporeal shockwave, and the control group accepted hot magnet for 2 weeks. They were assessed with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Finger-floor Distance (FFD) before and after treatment. Results The scores of VAS and FFD improved in both groups after treatment (P<0.05), and the difference before and after treatment were more in the treatment group than in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The pneumatically ballistic extracorporeal shockwave is more effective on chronic nonspecific low back pain than hot magnet.