中国康复理论与实践
中國康複理論與實踐
중국강복이론여실천
CHINESE JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION THEORY & PRACTICE
2013年
7期
662-665
,共4页
潘钰%郄淑燕%刘畅%甄巧霞%刘晓磊%丁永红%杨等%邰志红
潘鈺%郄淑燕%劉暢%甄巧霞%劉曉磊%丁永紅%楊等%邰誌紅
반옥%극숙연%류창%견교하%류효뢰%정영홍%양등%태지홍
不完全性脊髓损伤%重复经颅磁刺激%运动%步行
不完全性脊髓損傷%重複經顱磁刺激%運動%步行
불완전성척수손상%중복경로자자격%운동%보행
incomplete spinal cord injury%repetitive magnetic stimulation%motor%ambulation
目的观察重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗对不完全性脊髓损伤患者运动和步行功能的影响。方法18例C2~T12节段不完全性脊髓损伤患者(AIS D级)随机分为治疗组(n=10)和对照组(n=8)。治疗组于Cz部位给予rTMS,对照组患者给予假刺激。两组患者均接受常规康复治疗。治疗前后比较ASIA下肢运动评分(LEMS)、改良Ashworsh量表(MAS)、10 m步行速度、脊髓损伤步行指数Ⅱ(WISCIⅡ)和脊髓功能独立性评定(SCIM)。治疗后随访2周。结果治疗后,治疗组LEMS、10 m步行速度、SCIM均有改善(P<0.05),随访2周上述指标与治疗前比较仍有提高(P<0.05);对照组随访2周与治疗前比较SCIM有所改善(P<0.05)。与对照组比较,治疗组治疗后LEMS改善更多,随访2周LEMS仍优于对照组(P<0.05);MAS、10 m步行速度、WISCIⅡ和SCIM治疗后及随访两组比较均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论 rTMS可进一步改善不完全性脊髓损伤患者的下肢运动功能。
目的觀察重複經顱磁刺激(rTMS)治療對不完全性脊髓損傷患者運動和步行功能的影響。方法18例C2~T12節段不完全性脊髓損傷患者(AIS D級)隨機分為治療組(n=10)和對照組(n=8)。治療組于Cz部位給予rTMS,對照組患者給予假刺激。兩組患者均接受常規康複治療。治療前後比較ASIA下肢運動評分(LEMS)、改良Ashworsh量錶(MAS)、10 m步行速度、脊髓損傷步行指數Ⅱ(WISCIⅡ)和脊髓功能獨立性評定(SCIM)。治療後隨訪2週。結果治療後,治療組LEMS、10 m步行速度、SCIM均有改善(P<0.05),隨訪2週上述指標與治療前比較仍有提高(P<0.05);對照組隨訪2週與治療前比較SCIM有所改善(P<0.05)。與對照組比較,治療組治療後LEMS改善更多,隨訪2週LEMS仍優于對照組(P<0.05);MAS、10 m步行速度、WISCIⅡ和SCIM治療後及隨訪兩組比較均無顯著性差異(P>0.05)。結論 rTMS可進一步改善不完全性脊髓損傷患者的下肢運動功能。
목적관찰중복경로자자격(rTMS)치료대불완전성척수손상환자운동화보행공능적영향。방법18례C2~T12절단불완전성척수손상환자(AIS D급)수궤분위치료조(n=10)화대조조(n=8)。치료조우Cz부위급여rTMS,대조조환자급여가자격。량조환자균접수상규강복치료。치료전후비교ASIA하지운동평분(LEMS)、개량Ashworsh량표(MAS)、10 m보행속도、척수손상보행지수Ⅱ(WISCIⅡ)화척수공능독립성평정(SCIM)。치료후수방2주。결과치료후,치료조LEMS、10 m보행속도、SCIM균유개선(P<0.05),수방2주상술지표여치료전비교잉유제고(P<0.05);대조조수방2주여치료전비교SCIM유소개선(P<0.05)。여대조조비교,치료조치료후LEMS개선경다,수방2주LEMS잉우우대조조(P<0.05);MAS、10 m보행속도、WISCIⅡ화SCIM치료후급수방량조비교균무현저성차이(P>0.05)。결론 rTMS가진일보개선불완전성척수손상환자적하지운동공능。
Objective To assess the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor and ambulatory function in incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Methods 18 incomplete SCI patients (AIS D) were randomized to treatment group (n=10) and control group (n=8). The treatment group received rTMS while the control group received sham stimulation for 2 weeks. All the patients re-ceived routine rehabilitation. They were assessed with Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS), 10 m Walking Test for Walking Speed, modi-fied Ashworth scale (MAS), Walking Index for SCI Scale II(WISCI II), and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) before and after treatment, and followed up for 2 weeks after treatment. Results The treatment group significantly improved in LEMS, walking speed, and SCIM after treatment and during follow up (P<0.05), while the control group improved only in SCIM (P<0.05). There was more significant improvement in LEMS in the treatment group than in the control group (P<0.05) after treantment and during follow up. There was no differ-ence between two groups in MAS, walking speed, WISCI II and SCIM. Conclusion rTMS can further improve the motor of lowere limbs for incomplete SCI patients.