世界最新医学信息文摘(电子版)
世界最新醫學信息文摘(電子版)
세계최신의학신식문적(전자판)
World Latest Medicine Information
2013年
7期
10-11
,共2页
金树琦%马俊彪%纪晓玲%张柱
金樹琦%馬俊彪%紀曉玲%張柱
금수기%마준표%기효령%장주
支架置入术%搭桥手术%冠状动脉%冠心病
支架置入術%搭橋手術%冠狀動脈%冠心病
지가치입술%탑교수술%관상동맥%관심병
carotid stenting%Bypass surgery%coronary artery%coronary heart disease
目的对单纯左冠状动脉主干病变患者采用支架置入手术和冠脉搭桥手术的方法进行比较和分析。方法我院在2007年10月至2010年1月期间,一共收治了经冠状动脉造影证实为单纯左冠状动脉主干严重病变患者24例,对这些患者进行随机分组,介入组11例:对患者采用介入支架置入术治疗;搭桥组13例:对患者采用外科冠脉搭桥术治疗;对这两种治疗方法的效果及预后进行比较和分析。结果患者在手术治疗后3年内,两组患者的死亡和中风进行比较,搭桥组(13例):死亡2例,占15.4%;中风有3例,占23.1%。介入组(11例):死亡4例,占36.4%;中风有5例,占45.5%。差异显著,具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论采用搭桥手术对单纯左冠状动脉主干病变患者进行治疗,效果显著,优于行介入治疗。
目的對單純左冠狀動脈主榦病變患者採用支架置入手術和冠脈搭橋手術的方法進行比較和分析。方法我院在2007年10月至2010年1月期間,一共收治瞭經冠狀動脈造影證實為單純左冠狀動脈主榦嚴重病變患者24例,對這些患者進行隨機分組,介入組11例:對患者採用介入支架置入術治療;搭橋組13例:對患者採用外科冠脈搭橋術治療;對這兩種治療方法的效果及預後進行比較和分析。結果患者在手術治療後3年內,兩組患者的死亡和中風進行比較,搭橋組(13例):死亡2例,佔15.4%;中風有3例,佔23.1%。介入組(11例):死亡4例,佔36.4%;中風有5例,佔45.5%。差異顯著,具有統計學意義(P <0.05)。結論採用搭橋手術對單純左冠狀動脈主榦病變患者進行治療,效果顯著,優于行介入治療。
목적대단순좌관상동맥주간병변환자채용지가치입수술화관맥탑교수술적방법진행비교화분석。방법아원재2007년10월지2010년1월기간,일공수치료경관상동맥조영증실위단순좌관상동맥주간엄중병변환자24례,대저사환자진행수궤분조,개입조11례:대환자채용개입지가치입술치료;탑교조13례:대환자채용외과관맥탑교술치료;대저량충치료방법적효과급예후진행비교화분석。결과환자재수술치료후3년내,량조환자적사망화중풍진행비교,탑교조(13례):사망2례,점15.4%;중풍유3례,점23.1%。개입조(11례):사망4례,점36.4%;중풍유5례,점45.5%。차이현저,구유통계학의의(P <0.05)。결론채용탑교수술대단순좌관상동맥주간병변환자진행치료,효과현저,우우행개입치료。
Objective to right simplex left main coronary artery lesions in patients adopt stent implantation surgery and coronary artery bypass graft surgery's methods were compared and analysis. Methods our hospital in october 2007-January 2010 period, a total of admitted confirmed by coronary angiography alone severe left main coronary artery lesions in 24 cases, these patients were randomized to the intervention group of 11 patients:patients interventional stenting;bypass group of 13 patients:for patients with surgical treatment of coronary artery bypass surgery;these two treatments and prognosis compared and analyzed. result Within 3 years after the surgery patients, two groups of death and stroke in patients with comparison, bypass group (13 cases), 2 cases died, accounting for 15.4%;stroke in 3 cases, accounting for 23.1%. intervention group (11 cases), 4 cases died, accounting for 36.4%;stroke in 5 cases, accounting for 45.5%. the significant difference, statistically significant (P <0.05). conclusion Using a simple bypass surgery in patients with left main coronary artery disease treatment, the effect was significantly superior to interventional therapy.