临床儿科杂志
臨床兒科雜誌
림상인과잡지
2013年
7期
674-678
,共5页
苏林%许春娣%何婉儿%徐樨巍
囌林%許春娣%何婉兒%徐樨巍
소림%허춘제%하완인%서서외
急性腹泻%呕吐%婴儿%中草药%儿童
急性腹瀉%嘔吐%嬰兒%中草藥%兒童
급성복사%구토%영인%중초약%인동
acute diarrhea%vomit%infant%Chinese herb%child
目的研究小儿腹泻贴在治疗儿童急性腹泻中的疗效及安全性。方法采用多中心、随机、开放、阳性药物对照等效性试验。收集2011年3月至2012年11月上海、北京、广州3所医院儿科急性腹泻患儿。随机分成试验组和对照组,分别采用小儿腹泻贴、蒙脱石散剂治疗,同时均给予口服补液盐治疗。观察治疗前后患者腹泻次数、大便性状以及相关的临床症状及体征,比较治疗第3天以及第5天的疗效,并记录药物相关不良反应。结果共有197例符合入选条件的患儿完成研究,其中试验组100例,对照组97例。两组患儿的年龄、体质量、性别、治疗前腹泻时间、治疗前大便性状和次数、治疗期呕吐次数以及脱水、发热、哭闹、食欲不振、腹胀、腹痛等情况的差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05);试验组第3天和第5天的治疗有效率达97%和100%,与对照组差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05);试验组呕吐的恢复情况要优于对照组,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗期间未发现与药物有关的不良反应。结论小儿腹泻贴治疗儿童急性腹泻的疗效与蒙脱石散剂相同,对呕吐的疗效更优,且无不良反应。
目的研究小兒腹瀉貼在治療兒童急性腹瀉中的療效及安全性。方法採用多中心、隨機、開放、暘性藥物對照等效性試驗。收集2011年3月至2012年11月上海、北京、廣州3所醫院兒科急性腹瀉患兒。隨機分成試驗組和對照組,分彆採用小兒腹瀉貼、矇脫石散劑治療,同時均給予口服補液鹽治療。觀察治療前後患者腹瀉次數、大便性狀以及相關的臨床癥狀及體徵,比較治療第3天以及第5天的療效,併記錄藥物相關不良反應。結果共有197例符閤入選條件的患兒完成研究,其中試驗組100例,對照組97例。兩組患兒的年齡、體質量、性彆、治療前腹瀉時間、治療前大便性狀和次數、治療期嘔吐次數以及脫水、髮熱、哭鬧、食欲不振、腹脹、腹痛等情況的差異均無統計學意義(P均>0.05);試驗組第3天和第5天的治療有效率達97%和100%,與對照組差異無統計學意義(P均>0.05);試驗組嘔吐的恢複情況要優于對照組,且差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。治療期間未髮現與藥物有關的不良反應。結論小兒腹瀉貼治療兒童急性腹瀉的療效與矇脫石散劑相同,對嘔吐的療效更優,且無不良反應。
목적연구소인복사첩재치료인동급성복사중적료효급안전성。방법채용다중심、수궤、개방、양성약물대조등효성시험。수집2011년3월지2012년11월상해、북경、엄주3소의원인과급성복사환인。수궤분성시험조화대조조,분별채용소인복사첩、몽탈석산제치료,동시균급여구복보액염치료。관찰치료전후환자복사차수、대편성상이급상관적림상증상급체정,비교치료제3천이급제5천적료효,병기록약물상관불량반응。결과공유197례부합입선조건적환인완성연구,기중시험조100례,대조조97례。량조환인적년령、체질량、성별、치료전복사시간、치료전대편성상화차수、치료기구토차수이급탈수、발열、곡료、식욕불진、복창、복통등정황적차이균무통계학의의(P균>0.05);시험조제3천화제5천적치료유효솔체97%화100%,여대조조차이무통계학의의(P균>0.05);시험조구토적회복정황요우우대조조,차차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。치료기간미발현여약물유관적불량반응。결론소인복사첩치료인동급성복사적료효여몽탈석산제상동,대구토적료효경우,차무불량반응。
Objectives To evaluate the effect and safety of Xiao Er Fu Xie Tie in children with acute diarrhea. Methods A multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled clinical trial was carried out in three hospitals from March 2011 to December 2012. Children with acute diarrhea were enrolled and divided randomly into two groups, the observation group (treated with Xiao Er Fu Xie Tie) and the control group (treated with smectite powder). Boths groups received oral rehydration salts treatment. Symptoms and signs were recorded before and after therapy. The therapeutic effect was evaluated at 3 and 5 days after therapy. All of the adverse drug reactions were recorded during the study. Results In 197 children who completed the study, 100 children received Xiao Er Fu Xie Tie and 97 received smectite powder. Both groups were similar in age and gender distribution, weight, duration and frequency of diarrhea, times of vomiting, degree of dehydration and so on (P>0.05). After therapy, effective rates of the observation group at 3 days (97%) and 5 days (100%) were similar to those of control group (P>0.05). The effective rate for relieving vomiting in the observation group was higher than that in control group (P<0.05). No obvious adverse drug reactions were found during the study. Conclusions Xiao Er Fu Xie Tie has the same effect as smectite powder for treatment of acute diarrhea in children and is more effective in vomiting. Furthermore, no obvious adverse drug re-actions were found.