上海医药
上海醫藥
상해의약
SHANGHAI MEDICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL
2013年
14期
20-22,23
,共4页
彭慧%张一英%季莹%汤伟琴%李强%严小玲%庄琴
彭慧%張一英%季瑩%湯偉琴%李彊%嚴小玲%莊琴
팽혜%장일영%계형%탕위금%리강%엄소령%장금
中文版抑郁量表%信度%效度
中文版抑鬱量錶%信度%效度
중문판억욱량표%신도%효도
Chinese version SDS scale%reliability%validity
目的:对中文版自评抑郁量表SDS的信度和效度进行评价。方法:采用中文版抑郁量表对嘉定区某农村社区501名20~74岁女性进行问卷调查,用Cronbachα系数、因子分析、Pearson相关系数和t检验等方法考察量表的信度和效度。结果:量表的总Cronbachα系数为0.784,量表各维度的Cronbachα系数在0.350~0.737之间;分半信度的Cronbachα系数分别为0.662和0.819;因子分析的分析结果和量表的理论结构基本相符,各维度得分之间的相关系数在0.057~0.322之间,除精神性-情感症状维度和精神运动性障碍的相关性外,其余维度间的相关性均有统计学意义;抑郁组和非抑郁组在各维度得分的差异均有统计学意义。结论:中文版自评抑郁量表SDS除内容效度需做部分修订外,信度和效度较好,可以应用于中国文化背景下的女性抑郁情况等心理学状况评价。
目的:對中文版自評抑鬱量錶SDS的信度和效度進行評價。方法:採用中文版抑鬱量錶對嘉定區某農村社區501名20~74歲女性進行問捲調查,用Cronbachα繫數、因子分析、Pearson相關繫數和t檢驗等方法攷察量錶的信度和效度。結果:量錶的總Cronbachα繫數為0.784,量錶各維度的Cronbachα繫數在0.350~0.737之間;分半信度的Cronbachα繫數分彆為0.662和0.819;因子分析的分析結果和量錶的理論結構基本相符,各維度得分之間的相關繫數在0.057~0.322之間,除精神性-情感癥狀維度和精神運動性障礙的相關性外,其餘維度間的相關性均有統計學意義;抑鬱組和非抑鬱組在各維度得分的差異均有統計學意義。結論:中文版自評抑鬱量錶SDS除內容效度需做部分脩訂外,信度和效度較好,可以應用于中國文化揹景下的女性抑鬱情況等心理學狀況評價。
목적:대중문판자평억욱량표SDS적신도화효도진행평개。방법:채용중문판억욱량표대가정구모농촌사구501명20~74세녀성진행문권조사,용Cronbachα계수、인자분석、Pearson상관계수화t검험등방법고찰량표적신도화효도。결과:량표적총Cronbachα계수위0.784,량표각유도적Cronbachα계수재0.350~0.737지간;분반신도적Cronbachα계수분별위0.662화0.819;인자분석적분석결과화량표적이론결구기본상부,각유도득분지간적상관계수재0.057~0.322지간,제정신성-정감증상유도화정신운동성장애적상관성외,기여유도간적상관성균유통계학의의;억욱조화비억욱조재각유도득분적차이균유통계학의의。결론:중문판자평억욱량표SDS제내용효도수주부분수정외,신도화효도교호,가이응용우중국문화배경하적녀성억욱정황등심이학상황평개。
Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of Chinese version SDS Scale. Method:A total of 501 women were investigated with Chinese version SDS Scale in a rural community of Jiading District. The reliability and validity were examined by methods of Cronbach coefficient, factor analysis, Pearson correlation coefficient and t test. Result:The total reliability coefficient was 0.784(Cronbach), the reliability coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.350~0.737(Cronbach), the split-reliability coefficients were 0.662 and 0.819 respectively. The analyzed results of factor analysis were basically coincident with the theoretical scheme of the scales, the range of all dimension’s correlation coefficients was 0.057~0.322, and the results of correlation analysis showed that the difference was significant between each dimension except for mental-emotional symptoms dimension and psychomotor disorders dimension. The score difference of each dimension between depressed group and non-depressed group was also significant. Conclusion:The reliability and validity of Chinese version SDS Scale are acceptable and can be used to measure the female depression of psychology situation in the context of Chinese culture, except that certain parts of content validity require to be revised.