检验医学与临床
檢驗醫學與臨床
검험의학여림상
JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE AND CLINICAL SCIENCES
2013年
15期
1965-1967,1969
,共4页
杨艳%欧阳旭红%杨小理%向加林%黎兵%尹玲%郑远俊
楊豔%歐暘旭紅%楊小理%嚮加林%黎兵%尹玲%鄭遠俊
양염%구양욱홍%양소리%향가림%려병%윤령%정원준
全自动生化分析仪%肝功能指标%精密度%可比性
全自動生化分析儀%肝功能指標%精密度%可比性
전자동생화분석의%간공능지표%정밀도%가비성
full automatic biochemical analyzer%liver function index%precision%comparability
目的探讨实验室内Olympus AU系列全自动生化分析仪多个检测系统肝功能11项的精密度及可比性分析。方法参照美国国家临床实验室标准化委员会EP15-A方案,BIO-RAD常规化学质控品高、低2个浓度,每天分析一个批次,每批次重复测定4次,连续5个工作日分别对肝功能11项检测项目精密度进行分析;收集患者标本20份,分别于两台生化分析仪AU5400-1、AU5400-2的4个检测单元(参比系统X ,比较系统Y1、Y2、Y3)进行检测,每天测定4份,连续测定5天,并对肝功能11项结果可比性分析。结果AU54004个检测单元肝功能11项精密度分别按1/4、1/3CLIA′88标准或厂家声明,批内精密度、批间精密度均在可接受范围,比较系统Y1、Y2、Y3各项目相对偏倚均小于1/2 TEa CLIA′88或厂家声明,各项目相关系数均 r2>0.95。结论肝功能11项检测结果在Olympus AU系列4个检测系统精密度良好且相同项各结果呈显著相关,测定结果一致且具可比性。
目的探討實驗室內Olympus AU繫列全自動生化分析儀多箇檢測繫統肝功能11項的精密度及可比性分析。方法參照美國國傢臨床實驗室標準化委員會EP15-A方案,BIO-RAD常規化學質控品高、低2箇濃度,每天分析一箇批次,每批次重複測定4次,連續5箇工作日分彆對肝功能11項檢測項目精密度進行分析;收集患者標本20份,分彆于兩檯生化分析儀AU5400-1、AU5400-2的4箇檢測單元(參比繫統X ,比較繫統Y1、Y2、Y3)進行檢測,每天測定4份,連續測定5天,併對肝功能11項結果可比性分析。結果AU54004箇檢測單元肝功能11項精密度分彆按1/4、1/3CLIA′88標準或廠傢聲明,批內精密度、批間精密度均在可接受範圍,比較繫統Y1、Y2、Y3各項目相對偏倚均小于1/2 TEa CLIA′88或廠傢聲明,各項目相關繫數均 r2>0.95。結論肝功能11項檢測結果在Olympus AU繫列4箇檢測繫統精密度良好且相同項各結果呈顯著相關,測定結果一緻且具可比性。
목적탐토실험실내Olympus AU계렬전자동생화분석의다개검측계통간공능11항적정밀도급가비성분석。방법삼조미국국가림상실험실표준화위원회EP15-A방안,BIO-RAD상규화학질공품고、저2개농도,매천분석일개비차,매비차중복측정4차,련속5개공작일분별대간공능11항검측항목정밀도진행분석;수집환자표본20빈,분별우량태생화분석의AU5400-1、AU5400-2적4개검측단원(삼비계통X ,비교계통Y1、Y2、Y3)진행검측,매천측정4빈,련속측정5천,병대간공능11항결과가비성분석。결과AU54004개검측단원간공능11항정밀도분별안1/4、1/3CLIA′88표준혹엄가성명,비내정밀도、비간정밀도균재가접수범위,비교계통Y1、Y2、Y3각항목상대편의균소우1/2 TEa CLIA′88혹엄가성명,각항목상관계수균 r2>0.95。결론간공능11항검측결과재Olympus AU계렬4개검측계통정밀도량호차상동항각결과정현저상관,측정결과일치차구가비성。
Objective To explore the precision evaluation and comparison analysis of 11 items of hepatic func-tion index on different Olympus AU biochemical testing systems in laboratory .Methods According to the document EP15-A of national Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards ,11 items of hepatic function index were respectively detected by four different Olympus AU biochemic testing systems (reference system X ,Comparison system Y1 ,Y2 , Y3) to obtain precision and results of cmparability analysis .BIO-RAD routine biochemistry high and low controls were used to evaluate the precision of 11 items by repeatedly and continuously detecting 4 times ,5 days in one assay . 20 patients′serum were collected and analysed comparability through detecting 4 samples per day and 5 days .All re-sults were subjected to analysis of correlation .Results The intra-and inter-precision precision coefficients of 11 items of hepatic function were in the range of 1/4 or 1/3CLIA′88 or the statement of manufacturers .The relative bias level of Y1 or Y2 or Y3 comparable systems were low than 1/2 TEa CLIA′88 or the statement of manufacturers ,r2 >0 .95 .Conclusion The results of 11 items of hepatic function index show well precision and significantly correlation between four different Olympus AU biochemic testing systems ,the testing results might be concordant and comparable .