中国农学通报
中國農學通報
중국농학통보
CHINESE AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE BULLETIN
2013年
22期
10-14
,共5页
于永畅%王厚新%李承秀%孙忠奎%牛田%孙芳%王长宪%张林
于永暢%王厚新%李承秀%孫忠奎%牛田%孫芳%王長憲%張林
우영창%왕후신%리승수%손충규%우전%손방%왕장헌%장림
紫薇%四倍体%光合特性%净光合速率
紫薇%四倍體%光閤特性%淨光閤速率
자미%사배체%광합특성%정광합속솔
Lagerstroemia indica L.%Tetraploid%photosynthetic characteristics%net photosynthetic rate
为了解四倍体紫薇和二倍体紫薇光合生理特性的差异,培育优质林木,采用英国PP-Systems公司产CIRAS-1型便携式光合系统测定人工诱变培育的四倍体紫薇品种和二倍体紫薇品种的各项光合生理参数及其变化规律。结果表明:四倍体和二倍体紫薇的叶片净光合速率(Pn)日变化都呈单峰型曲线,但峰值出现的时间不同。2个紫薇品种的Pn、气孔导度(Gs)和水分利用率(WUE)差异显著,蒸腾速率(Tr)、表观量子效率(AQY)和羧化效率(CE)差异不显著。光饱和点(LSP)为二倍体紫薇[1445μmol/(m2·s)]<四倍体紫薇[1670μmol/(m2·s)],光补偿点(LCP)为二倍体紫薇[12.23μmol/(m2·s)]<四倍体紫薇[42.2μmol/(m2·s)];CO2饱和点(CSP)为二倍体紫薇(1200μmol/mol)<四倍体紫薇(1427.5μmol/mol),CO2补偿点(CCP)为二倍体紫薇(32.24μmol/mol)<四倍体紫薇(35.71μmol/mol)。四倍体紫薇单位叶面积叶绿素含量显著高于二倍体紫薇(P<0.05)。
為瞭解四倍體紫薇和二倍體紫薇光閤生理特性的差異,培育優質林木,採用英國PP-Systems公司產CIRAS-1型便攜式光閤繫統測定人工誘變培育的四倍體紫薇品種和二倍體紫薇品種的各項光閤生理參數及其變化規律。結果錶明:四倍體和二倍體紫薇的葉片淨光閤速率(Pn)日變化都呈單峰型麯線,但峰值齣現的時間不同。2箇紫薇品種的Pn、氣孔導度(Gs)和水分利用率(WUE)差異顯著,蒸騰速率(Tr)、錶觀量子效率(AQY)和羧化效率(CE)差異不顯著。光飽和點(LSP)為二倍體紫薇[1445μmol/(m2·s)]<四倍體紫薇[1670μmol/(m2·s)],光補償點(LCP)為二倍體紫薇[12.23μmol/(m2·s)]<四倍體紫薇[42.2μmol/(m2·s)];CO2飽和點(CSP)為二倍體紫薇(1200μmol/mol)<四倍體紫薇(1427.5μmol/mol),CO2補償點(CCP)為二倍體紫薇(32.24μmol/mol)<四倍體紫薇(35.71μmol/mol)。四倍體紫薇單位葉麵積葉綠素含量顯著高于二倍體紫薇(P<0.05)。
위료해사배체자미화이배체자미광합생리특성적차이,배육우질림목,채용영국PP-Systems공사산CIRAS-1형편휴식광합계통측정인공유변배육적사배체자미품충화이배체자미품충적각항광합생리삼수급기변화규률。결과표명:사배체화이배체자미적협편정광합속솔(Pn)일변화도정단봉형곡선,단봉치출현적시간불동。2개자미품충적Pn、기공도도(Gs)화수분이용솔(WUE)차이현저,증등속솔(Tr)、표관양자효솔(AQY)화최화효솔(CE)차이불현저。광포화점(LSP)위이배체자미[1445μmol/(m2·s)]<사배체자미[1670μmol/(m2·s)],광보상점(LCP)위이배체자미[12.23μmol/(m2·s)]<사배체자미[42.2μmol/(m2·s)];CO2포화점(CSP)위이배체자미(1200μmol/mol)<사배체자미(1427.5μmol/mol),CO2보상점(CCP)위이배체자미(32.24μmol/mol)<사배체자미(35.71μmol/mol)。사배체자미단위협면적협록소함량현저고우이배체자미(P<0.05)。
In order to analyze the differences on photosynthetic characteristics of tetraploid and diploid Lagerstroemia indica L. and develop high- quality forest, CIRAS-1 portable photosynthesis system was employed to measure various photosynthetic physiological parameters and their variation regularities in tetraploid and diploid Lagerstroemia indica L.. The results showed that both the diurnal change of net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of etraploid and diploid Lagerstroemia indica L. showed a single-peak curve, but the peak value appeared at different hours. The net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and water use efficiency had significant difference between the tetraploid and diploid Lagerstroemia indica L. and the transpiration rate, apparent quantum yield and carboxylation efficiency had no significant difference. Light saturation point (LSP) of diploid Lagerstroemia indica L. [1445 μmol/(m2·s)] was lower than that of tetraploid Lagerstroemia indica L. [1670 μmol/(m2·s)] and light compensation point (LCP) of diploid Lagerstroemia indica L.[12.23 μmol/(m2·s)] was lower than that of tetraploid Lagerstroemia indica L.[42.2 μmol/(m2·s)]. CO2 saturation point (CSP) of diploid Lagerstroemia indica L. (1200 μmol/mol) was lower than that of tetraploid Lagerstroemia indica L. (1427.5 μmol/mol) and CO2 saturation point (CCP) of diploid Lagerstroemia indica L. (32.24 μmol/mol) was lower than that of tetraploid Lagerstroemia indica L. (35.71 μmol/mol). The chlorophyll content of unit leaf area of tetraploid Lagerstroemia indica L. were significantly higher than that of the diploid Lagerstroemia indica L. (P<0.05).