中华耳科学杂志
中華耳科學雜誌
중화이과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY
2013年
2期
185-191
,共7页
毛弈韬%伍伟景%谢鼎华%彭安全%肖自安%杨曙%刘嘉
毛弈韜%伍偉景%謝鼎華%彭安全%肖自安%楊曙%劉嘉
모혁도%오위경%사정화%팽안전%초자안%양서%류가
人工耳蜗植入%康复效果%标准化评估%CAP与SIR
人工耳蝸植入%康複效果%標準化評估%CAP與SIR
인공이와식입%강복효과%표준화평고%CAP여SIR
Cochlear implant%Rehabilitation efficacy%Standardized assessment%CAP and SIR
目的对225例语前聋患儿进行一年的术后跟踪评估,探讨植入时年龄及康复时间与康复效果的关系,以及分析国内标准化评估程序与国际通用评估方法之关系,是否具有可比性。方法收集近年来在我院施行人工耳蜗植入术的语前聋患儿225例的详细资料,按植入时的年龄将研究对象分为2组(3岁以上组与3岁以下组),分别在人工耳蜗植入术前与术后3、6、9、12个月评估其言语听觉能力与语言能力,并通过问卷方式获得其CAP和SIR评级得分并记录。结果术后康复总体效果随着康复时间延长而逐步提高,3岁以下组在言语感知及语言能力上提升较3岁以上组快,CAP和SIR评级提升速率两组未见显著统计学差异。言语识别率与CAP评级,语言年龄与SIR评级之间分别存在显著正相关性。两种类型植入体的康复效果未见显著区别。结论植入时年龄与康复时间是影响康复效果的两大重要因素,植入年龄越小,康复时间越长效果越好。国内常用的标准化评估程序与国际通用评估方法具有一定程度的同等说明性,可互为参考,但两者不可完全相互替代。
目的對225例語前聾患兒進行一年的術後跟蹤評估,探討植入時年齡及康複時間與康複效果的關繫,以及分析國內標準化評估程序與國際通用評估方法之關繫,是否具有可比性。方法收集近年來在我院施行人工耳蝸植入術的語前聾患兒225例的詳細資料,按植入時的年齡將研究對象分為2組(3歲以上組與3歲以下組),分彆在人工耳蝸植入術前與術後3、6、9、12箇月評估其言語聽覺能力與語言能力,併通過問捲方式穫得其CAP和SIR評級得分併記錄。結果術後康複總體效果隨著康複時間延長而逐步提高,3歲以下組在言語感知及語言能力上提升較3歲以上組快,CAP和SIR評級提升速率兩組未見顯著統計學差異。言語識彆率與CAP評級,語言年齡與SIR評級之間分彆存在顯著正相關性。兩種類型植入體的康複效果未見顯著區彆。結論植入時年齡與康複時間是影響康複效果的兩大重要因素,植入年齡越小,康複時間越長效果越好。國內常用的標準化評估程序與國際通用評估方法具有一定程度的同等說明性,可互為參攷,但兩者不可完全相互替代。
목적대225례어전롱환인진행일년적술후근종평고,탐토식입시년령급강복시간여강복효과적관계,이급분석국내표준화평고정서여국제통용평고방법지관계,시부구유가비성。방법수집근년래재아원시행인공이와식입술적어전롱환인225례적상세자료,안식입시적년령장연구대상분위2조(3세이상조여3세이하조),분별재인공이와식입술전여술후3、6、9、12개월평고기언어은각능력여어언능력,병통과문권방식획득기CAP화SIR평급득분병기록。결과술후강복총체효과수착강복시간연장이축보제고,3세이하조재언어감지급어언능력상제승교3세이상조쾌,CAP화SIR평급제승속솔량조미견현저통계학차이。언어식별솔여CAP평급,어언년령여SIR평급지간분별존재현저정상관성。량충류형식입체적강복효과미견현저구별。결론식입시년령여강복시간시영향강복효과적량대중요인소,식입년령월소,강복시간월장효과월호。국내상용적표준화평고정서여국제통용평고방법구유일정정도적동등설명성,가호위삼고,단량자불가완전상호체대。
Objective The purpose of the present study was to study the relationship between rehabilitation outcomes and the age at implantation as well as the duration of implant use, and to compare the standardized assessment procedures in China and those commonly used internationally. Methods Two hundred twenty five children who received cochlear im-plants in our hospital in recent years were identified and separated into two groups based upon if their ages were older than 3 years or not at implantation. Their clinical data were reviewed and their speech perception and production prior to, and at third, sixth, ninth, twelfth months after device activation were evaluated. Their CAP and SIR scores were collected through questionnaires at each assessment interval. Results The overall rehabilitation level improved along with the increase of du-ration of implant use. The performance in children who were younger than 3 years at implantation improved more rapidly in speech perception and production as compared with the other children, although there was no remarkable difference in the rate of CAP and SIR improvement between the two groups. There were prominent positive correlations between speech per-ception rate and CAP, and between speech age and SIR. There was no statistically significant difference between the two types of implant. Conclusion Two of the most important factors affecting post-operational rehabilitation results are age at implantation and duration of implant use. The younger the age at implantation and the longer the duration of implant use, the better the rehabilitation results. The standardized assessment procedures used in China are comparable to those com-monly used internationally on some aspects and they can be used in a complementary manner, although they cannot replace each other completely.