实用肝脏病杂志
實用肝髒病雜誌
실용간장병잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HEPATOLOGY
2013年
4期
317-319
,共3页
柳芳芳%段学章%臧红%郭晓东%申力军%赵攀%胡瑾华%辛绍杰
柳芳芳%段學章%臧紅%郭曉東%申力軍%趙攀%鬍瑾華%辛紹傑
류방방%단학장%장홍%곽효동%신력군%조반%호근화%신소걸
药物性肝损伤%中药%西药%病理学%自身免疫
藥物性肝損傷%中藥%西藥%病理學%自身免疫
약물성간손상%중약%서약%병이학%자신면역
Drug-induced liver injury%Traditional Chinese herbs%Western medicines%Liver pathology%Au-toimmune response
目的比较中药和西药致急性药物性肝损伤(ADILI)的临床特点和肝组织病理学改变。方法回顾性分析中药致ADILI患者96例和西药致ADILI患者113例,比较两类药物致ADILI的临床表现、生化学指标、免疫学指标及肝组织病理学改变的异同。结果两组患者临床表现和生化学指标相似,但中药组患者血清自身抗体阳性率为27.1%,显著高于西药组(14.2%,P<0.05);中药组肝组织点状或灶状坏死(93.8%)与西药组(94.7%)表现相似,但中药组中融合性坏死(51.0%)、界面炎(65.6%)和纤维间隔形成(54.2%)显著高于西药组(33.6%、50.4%和37.2%,P<0.05),且汇管区淋巴细胞-浆细胞浸润(26.0%)较西药组(19.5%,P>0.05)显著。结论中药和西药致ADILI的临床表现与生化学指标与西药所致者相似,但前者自身免疫反应和病理学改变更趋于严重。
目的比較中藥和西藥緻急性藥物性肝損傷(ADILI)的臨床特點和肝組織病理學改變。方法迴顧性分析中藥緻ADILI患者96例和西藥緻ADILI患者113例,比較兩類藥物緻ADILI的臨床錶現、生化學指標、免疫學指標及肝組織病理學改變的異同。結果兩組患者臨床錶現和生化學指標相似,但中藥組患者血清自身抗體暘性率為27.1%,顯著高于西藥組(14.2%,P<0.05);中藥組肝組織點狀或竈狀壞死(93.8%)與西藥組(94.7%)錶現相似,但中藥組中融閤性壞死(51.0%)、界麵炎(65.6%)和纖維間隔形成(54.2%)顯著高于西藥組(33.6%、50.4%和37.2%,P<0.05),且彙管區淋巴細胞-漿細胞浸潤(26.0%)較西藥組(19.5%,P>0.05)顯著。結論中藥和西藥緻ADILI的臨床錶現與生化學指標與西藥所緻者相似,但前者自身免疫反應和病理學改變更趨于嚴重。
목적비교중약화서약치급성약물성간손상(ADILI)적림상특점화간조직병이학개변。방법회고성분석중약치ADILI환자96례화서약치ADILI환자113례,비교량류약물치ADILI적림상표현、생화학지표、면역학지표급간조직병이학개변적이동。결과량조환자림상표현화생화학지표상사,단중약조환자혈청자신항체양성솔위27.1%,현저고우서약조(14.2%,P<0.05);중약조간조직점상혹조상배사(93.8%)여서약조(94.7%)표현상사,단중약조중융합성배사(51.0%)、계면염(65.6%)화섬유간격형성(54.2%)현저고우서약조(33.6%、50.4%화37.2%,P<0.05),차회관구림파세포-장세포침윤(26.0%)교서약조(19.5%,P>0.05)현저。결론중약화서약치ADILI적림상표현여생화학지표여서약소치자상사,단전자자신면역반응화병이학개변경추우엄중。
Objective To compare the clinical and hepatic pathologic features in patients with acute drug-induced liver injury (ADILI) caused by traditional Chinese herbs and western medicines. Methods The clinical parameters were obtained and liver biopsies were performed in patients with ADILI induced by traditional Chinese herbs (group A,n=96) or by western medicines (group B,n=113). Results There was no significant difference in clinical features (i.e. fatigue,poor appetite,nausea,abdominal distension,pruritus,fever) and biochemical serum parameters (ALT,AST,AKP,GGT,total bilirubin) in the two groups; in contrast to a rate of 14.2%(P<0.05)in group B,27.1% of patients in group A were positive for certain serum autoimmune antibodies; spotted and focal necrosis in liver tissues were similar between the two groups (93.8% vs.94.7%,P>0.05),however,confluent necro-sis(51.0% vs. 33.6%),interface inflammation (65.6% vs.50.4%) and fibrous septa formations (54.2% vs.37.2%) in group A were significantly higher than those in group B (P<0.05),and lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates in group A(26.04%)were significantly higher than that in group B(19.5%,P>0.05). Conclusions Even though the clinical features and biochemical parameters in patients with ADILI caused by traditional Chinese herbs and western medicines are similar,traditional Chinese herbs are more likely to cause autoimmune responses and more severe hepatic pathological changes than western medicines.