中国卫生产业
中國衛生產業
중국위생산업
CHINA HEALTH INDUSTRY
2014年
15期
25-26
,共2页
石永久%莫华梅%张舞红%许立创%彭明
石永久%莫華梅%張舞紅%許立創%彭明
석영구%막화매%장무홍%허립창%팽명
消化道穿孔%X线%CT检查%方式%影像学表现
消化道穿孔%X線%CT檢查%方式%影像學錶現
소화도천공%X선%CT검사%방식%영상학표현
Digestive tract perforation%X-ray%CT examination%Mode%Imaging manifestation
目的:探讨消化道穿孔的X线、CT检查方法及不同的影像表现。方法选取来我院进行诊治的消化道穿孔患者96例,其中男60例,女26例,患者的年龄为22~68岁,患者平均年龄为(46.2±12.4)岁。96例患者均先采取X线检查进行临床诊断,然后再进行CT检查进行临床诊断。观察记录患者采取X线检查的影像学表现、采取CT检查的影像学表现,并且对比分析两种诊断方式的临床诊断符合率。结果 CT检查诊断与手术结果相符合的患者有89例,诊断准确率为92.7%,CT检查诊断与手术结果相符合的患者有68例,诊断准确率为70.8%。术前X线检查的诊断符合率显著高于X线检查,比较差异具有统计学意义(χ2=4.092,P<0.05)。结论临床建议,对于消化道穿孔的诊断可采取多种检查手段综合利用,优先考虑CT扫描的方式进行诊断,以此来提高消化道穿孔的检出率和临床诊断准确率。
目的:探討消化道穿孔的X線、CT檢查方法及不同的影像錶現。方法選取來我院進行診治的消化道穿孔患者96例,其中男60例,女26例,患者的年齡為22~68歲,患者平均年齡為(46.2±12.4)歲。96例患者均先採取X線檢查進行臨床診斷,然後再進行CT檢查進行臨床診斷。觀察記錄患者採取X線檢查的影像學錶現、採取CT檢查的影像學錶現,併且對比分析兩種診斷方式的臨床診斷符閤率。結果 CT檢查診斷與手術結果相符閤的患者有89例,診斷準確率為92.7%,CT檢查診斷與手術結果相符閤的患者有68例,診斷準確率為70.8%。術前X線檢查的診斷符閤率顯著高于X線檢查,比較差異具有統計學意義(χ2=4.092,P<0.05)。結論臨床建議,對于消化道穿孔的診斷可採取多種檢查手段綜閤利用,優先攷慮CT掃描的方式進行診斷,以此來提高消化道穿孔的檢齣率和臨床診斷準確率。
목적:탐토소화도천공적X선、CT검사방법급불동적영상표현。방법선취래아원진행진치적소화도천공환자96례,기중남60례,녀26례,환자적년령위22~68세,환자평균년령위(46.2±12.4)세。96례환자균선채취X선검사진행림상진단,연후재진행CT검사진행림상진단。관찰기록환자채취X선검사적영상학표현、채취CT검사적영상학표현,병차대비분석량충진단방식적림상진단부합솔。결과 CT검사진단여수술결과상부합적환자유89례,진단준학솔위92.7%,CT검사진단여수술결과상부합적환자유68례,진단준학솔위70.8%。술전X선검사적진단부합솔현저고우X선검사,비교차이구유통계학의의(χ2=4.092,P<0.05)。결론림상건의,대우소화도천공적진단가채취다충검사수단종합이용,우선고필CT소묘적방식진행진단,이차래제고소화도천공적검출솔화림상진단준학솔。
Objective To study the X-ray, CT examination of gastrointestinal perforation and different image performance. Methods 96 patients came to our hospital for diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal perforation, including 60 male cases, 26 female cas-es, the age of the patients was 22~68 years old, the average age of the patients was (46.2+12.4) years old. All the 96 patients take X-ray examination of clinical diagnosis, then the CT examination for clinical diagnosis. Observe and record the patients were taken X-ray imaging, CT imaging performance, and compared the clinical diagnosis of two kinds of diagnosis coincidence rate. Results Before treatment, operation, diagnosis and operation results X-ray with 89 cases, the accurate diagnostic rate was 92.7%, CT scan in the diagnosis and operation results in patients with 68 cases, the accurate diagnostic rate was 70.8%. Preoperative diagnosis of CT diagnostic accordance rate was significantly higher than that of X-ray examination, with significant difference (χ2=4.092, P<0.05). Conclusion Clinical recommendations for diagnosis of digestive tract perforation, may adopt the comprehensive utilization of vari-ous examination methods, preferred CT scanning method for diagnosis, in order to improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis and the detection rate of digestive tract perforation.