地球信息科学学报
地毬信息科學學報
지구신식과학학보
GEO-INFORMATION SCIENCE
2013年
4期
574-580
,共7页
线性光谱混合模型%城市下垫面%定量研究%高光谱融合图像
線性光譜混閤模型%城市下墊麵%定量研究%高光譜融閤圖像
선성광보혼합모형%성시하점면%정량연구%고광보융합도상
linear spectral mixing model%urban underlying surface%quantitative study%fusion image from high spectrum images
基于Hyperion高光谱与ALOS全色波段的融合图像,运用线性波谱分离模型,对影响城市下垫面分类的因子进行定量分析。结果显示:随着空间分辨率的递增,融合图像光谱保真性呈下降之势,并呈现出阈值现象,但所有相关系数值都大于0.90,表明以融合图像进行线性波谱分离提取城市下垫面具有可靠性;下垫面分类总精度则整体明显下降,Kappa系数值也几乎单调减少。大气校正后下垫面分类的总精度和Kappa系数都明显高于大气校正前;当丰度分割值由10%增至60%时,生成的下垫面分类图像的精度单调降低,表明应慎用50%阈值分割法。
基于Hyperion高光譜與ALOS全色波段的融閤圖像,運用線性波譜分離模型,對影響城市下墊麵分類的因子進行定量分析。結果顯示:隨著空間分辨率的遞增,融閤圖像光譜保真性呈下降之勢,併呈現齣閾值現象,但所有相關繫數值都大于0.90,錶明以融閤圖像進行線性波譜分離提取城市下墊麵具有可靠性;下墊麵分類總精度則整體明顯下降,Kappa繫數值也幾乎單調減少。大氣校正後下墊麵分類的總精度和Kappa繫數都明顯高于大氣校正前;噹豐度分割值由10%增至60%時,生成的下墊麵分類圖像的精度單調降低,錶明應慎用50%閾值分割法。
기우Hyperion고광보여ALOS전색파단적융합도상,운용선성파보분리모형,대영향성시하점면분류적인자진행정량분석。결과현시:수착공간분변솔적체증,융합도상광보보진성정하강지세,병정현출역치현상,단소유상관계수치도대우0.90,표명이융합도상진행선성파보분리제취성시하점면구유가고성;하점면분류총정도칙정체명현하강,Kappa계수치야궤호단조감소。대기교정후하점면분류적총정도화Kappa계수도명현고우대기교정전;당봉도분할치유10%증지60%시,생성적하점면분류도상적정도단조강저,표명응신용50%역치분할법。
Based on fusion images of Hyperion and ALOS, using linear spectral mixing model, quantitative anal-ysis on fusion effect and its factors was explored, which included atmospheric correction via FLAASH in ENVI, spatial resolution of image, threshold value for classification of rule images. The results showed that much infor-mation would be lost with spatial resolutions becoming coarser, as well as a threshold value existed. Still, correla-tive coefficients between raw images and coarser resolution images were all larger than 0.90 which indicated im-ages kept their raw spectrum and could be used to identify surface of land . Meanwhile, total accuracy and Kap-pa coefficient presented downward trend. Total accuracy and Kappa values for classification corrected by FLAASH were larger than that for uncorrected images, while classification map was turned into pieces which were not in accord with the actual condition. Segment threshold of fraction was one of key factors when fraction images were separated into patches to create classification images. While threshold value was from 10%to 60%, total accuracy of classification maps displayed the opposite trend to decrease. The spectrum in a pixel within the area ratio may tend to be balanced, and there was not absolutely dominant spectrum in the pixels. This revealed the value of 50%, commonly adopted, should be used on condition. And Here the different thresholds should be given for different objects.