中国病案
中國病案
중국병안
CHINESE MEDICAL RECORD
2014年
4期
48-49
,共2页
红梅%刘茁%何敬堂%刘亚宁%楚恒群
紅梅%劉茁%何敬堂%劉亞寧%楚恆群
홍매%류촬%하경당%류아저%초항군
单病种%质量管理%方法
單病種%質量管理%方法
단병충%질량관리%방법
Single disease%Quality management%Methods
目的:通过对良性前列腺增生单病种的质量监控与分析,探讨单病种质量管理的方法,以提高单病种质量水平。方法选取某三级甲等医院42例良性前列腺增生经尿道前列腺电切(TURP)术的病例为研究对象,应用SPSS16.0统计软件对质量指标数据进行统计分析,病历书写质量按照5级评分方法评分,并进行缺陷统计。结果手术持续时间平均102.7±43.0分钟;预防性应用抗菌药物时间较长;治愈率100%;平均住院日12.2±2.8天,其中术前平均住院日5.3±2.2天;平均医疗费用10485.3±2515.0元,其中平均药费5358.1±1515.0元,药费比例50.4%;病历书写质量平均83.3分。结论在单病种形成的三个环节,对不同的监控对象采用不同的监控方法,实现单病种持续质量改进。
目的:通過對良性前列腺增生單病種的質量鑑控與分析,探討單病種質量管理的方法,以提高單病種質量水平。方法選取某三級甲等醫院42例良性前列腺增生經尿道前列腺電切(TURP)術的病例為研究對象,應用SPSS16.0統計軟件對質量指標數據進行統計分析,病歷書寫質量按照5級評分方法評分,併進行缺陷統計。結果手術持續時間平均102.7±43.0分鐘;預防性應用抗菌藥物時間較長;治愈率100%;平均住院日12.2±2.8天,其中術前平均住院日5.3±2.2天;平均醫療費用10485.3±2515.0元,其中平均藥費5358.1±1515.0元,藥費比例50.4%;病歷書寫質量平均83.3分。結論在單病種形成的三箇環節,對不同的鑑控對象採用不同的鑑控方法,實現單病種持續質量改進。
목적:통과대량성전렬선증생단병충적질량감공여분석,탐토단병충질량관리적방법,이제고단병충질량수평。방법선취모삼급갑등의원42례량성전렬선증생경뇨도전렬선전절(TURP)술적병례위연구대상,응용SPSS16.0통계연건대질량지표수거진행통계분석,병역서사질량안조5급평분방법평분,병진행결함통계。결과수술지속시간평균102.7±43.0분종;예방성응용항균약물시간교장;치유솔100%;평균주원일12.2±2.8천,기중술전평균주원일5.3±2.2천;평균의료비용10485.3±2515.0원,기중평균약비5358.1±1515.0원,약비비례50.4%;병역서사질량평균83.3분。결론재단병충형성적삼개배절,대불동적감공대상채용불동적감공방법,실현단병충지속질량개진。
Objective Single disease quality management are discussed to improve the quality level of single diseases by quality monitoring and analysis of single disease of benign prostatic hyperplasia.Methods 42 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia with TURP in a level of first-class hospitalwere researched by SPSS16.0 statistical software. Medical record writing quality was evaluated according to the level 5 method and make defect statistics.Results The average operation duration was 102.7 + 43.0 minutes. The Preventive antimicrobial use for a long time.recovery rate was 100%. The average length of stay was 12.2±2.8.The average length of stay before operation was 5.3±2.2.The average medical expense was 10485.3±2515.0 yuan. The average expenses for medicine was 5358.1± 1515.0 yuan. Proportion of expenses for medicine was 50.4%. The average score of Medical record writing quality was 83.3. Conclusion We using different monitoring methods for different monitoring objects In the three links of single diseases, to realize the continuous quality improvement of single diseases.