南水北调与水利科技
南水北調與水利科技
남수북조여수리과기
SOUTH-TO-NORTH WATER
2013年
5期
43-47
,共5页
土地生态环境质量%GIS%RS%泸定县%图形叠置%层次分析法
土地生態環境質量%GIS%RS%瀘定縣%圖形疊置%層次分析法
토지생태배경질량%GIS%RS%로정현%도형첩치%층차분석법
soil ecological environment quality%GIS%RS%Luding county%graphic overlay%Analytic H ierarchy Process
现有的土地评价工作侧重于土地应用功能,而对土地生态环境功能的考虑比较少。为了探索考虑生态环境功能的土地质量评价方法,选择生态环境条件脆弱的泸定县为研究区,在土地利用类型的基础上,加入坡度、坡向、高程等地形要素指标,建立土地生态环境质量评价指标体系,并应用GIS、RS和层次分析( AHP)技术获取评价因子专题图,经过图形叠置生成泸定县土地生态环境质量等级图。评价结果显示,影响研究区土地生态环境质量的主要因素为坡度、降水量、高程、植被指数和土壤质地等。经过对泸定县土地生态环境质量评价等级与地貌类型、土地利用方式及生态环境因素进行对比分析,认为评价结果与现实条件吻合较好。
現有的土地評價工作側重于土地應用功能,而對土地生態環境功能的攷慮比較少。為瞭探索攷慮生態環境功能的土地質量評價方法,選擇生態環境條件脆弱的瀘定縣為研究區,在土地利用類型的基礎上,加入坡度、坡嚮、高程等地形要素指標,建立土地生態環境質量評價指標體繫,併應用GIS、RS和層次分析( AHP)技術穫取評價因子專題圖,經過圖形疊置生成瀘定縣土地生態環境質量等級圖。評價結果顯示,影響研究區土地生態環境質量的主要因素為坡度、降水量、高程、植被指數和土壤質地等。經過對瀘定縣土地生態環境質量評價等級與地貌類型、土地利用方式及生態環境因素進行對比分析,認為評價結果與現實條件吻閤較好。
현유적토지평개공작측중우토지응용공능,이대토지생태배경공능적고필비교소。위료탐색고필생태배경공능적토지질량평개방법,선택생태배경조건취약적로정현위연구구,재토지이용류형적기출상,가입파도、파향、고정등지형요소지표,건립토지생태배경질량평개지표체계,병응용GIS、RS화층차분석( AHP)기술획취평개인자전제도,경과도형첩치생성로정현토지생태배경질량등급도。평개결과현시,영향연구구토지생태배경질량적주요인소위파도、강수량、고정、식피지수화토양질지등。경과대로정현토지생태배경질량평개등급여지모류형、토지이용방식급생태배경인소진행대비분석,인위평개결과여현실조건문합교호。
The current soil assessment met hod focuses on the application function of soil, while the ecological environment func-tion is not largely considered. In order to examine the soil quality assessment met hod in consideration of ecological environment function, an ecological environment qualit y assessment index syst em w as developed to evaluate the soil quality of Luding Coun-ty, a typical y vulnerable dist rict of ecological environment. T he system w as based on land use and incorporat ed the topographic factors such as slope, aspect , and elevation. GIS, RS, and Analytic H ierarchy Process ( AH P) t echnique were employed to obtain the thematic maps of evaluat ion indexes, w hich w ere overlaid to generate the soil ecological environment quality map of Luding County. The results indicat ed the main factors affecting t he soil ecological environment quality in the study area include the slope, precipitat ion, elevation, vegetation index, and soil texture. The soil ecological environment quality assessment results were compared w ith the topography, land use, and ecological environment factors, which suggested that the assessment results are in accordance w ith the actual conditions.