桉树科技
桉樹科技
안수과기
EUCALYPT SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
2014年
1期
7-10
,共4页
桉树%扦插苗%组培苗%变异系数%投入产出比
桉樹%扢插苗%組培苗%變異繫數%投入產齣比
안수%천삽묘%조배묘%변이계수%투입산출비
Eucalyptus%cutting%tissue culture propagule%the coefficient of variation%the ratio of input and output
在相同立地条件下,对尾巨桉DH32-29扦插苗与组培苗进行造林1.5 a和2.5 a后的生长状况对比研究,结果表明:不同苗木类型在树高、胸径、枝下高、冠幅、树高变异系数等均无明显差异(P>0.05);在林木胸径变异系数、保存率和蓄积量方面存在显著差异(P<0.05),3个生长指标的结果表明:用组培苗造林在投入产出及林木生长量上优于扦插苗造林,组培苗造林增加的450元?hm-2成本,在2.5年生林木产出的价值中可数倍回收,投入产出比达4.08:1。
在相同立地條件下,對尾巨桉DH32-29扢插苗與組培苗進行造林1.5 a和2.5 a後的生長狀況對比研究,結果錶明:不同苗木類型在樹高、胸徑、枝下高、冠幅、樹高變異繫數等均無明顯差異(P>0.05);在林木胸徑變異繫數、保存率和蓄積量方麵存在顯著差異(P<0.05),3箇生長指標的結果錶明:用組培苗造林在投入產齣及林木生長量上優于扢插苗造林,組培苗造林增加的450元?hm-2成本,在2.5年生林木產齣的價值中可數倍迴收,投入產齣比達4.08:1。
재상동입지조건하,대미거안DH32-29천삽묘여조배묘진행조림1.5 a화2.5 a후적생장상황대비연구,결과표명:불동묘목류형재수고、흉경、지하고、관폭、수고변이계수등균무명현차이(P>0.05);재림목흉경변이계수、보존솔화축적량방면존재현저차이(P<0.05),3개생장지표적결과표명:용조배묘조림재투입산출급림목생장량상우우천삽묘조림,조배묘조림증가적450원?hm-2성본,재2.5년생림목산출적개치중가수배회수,투입산출비체4.08:1。
A field trial was conducted to examine the growth of rametes of the clone DH32-29 propagated as rooted cuttings compared to those propagated by tissue culture. At 1.5 and 2.5 years after planting there were no significant differences (P>0.05) between the two types of plants for tree height, DBH, height to the first branch, crown diameter, or for the coefficient of variation for tree height, but there were significant differences (P<0.05) for the coefficient variation for tree DBH, survival rate and individual tree volume. The results showed that tissue culture propagules were obviously superior to rooted cuttings for the latter three traits. The value of the marginal increase in volume was estimated to be several times that of the increased marginal cost of RMB 450 per hectare incurred for plantations established with tissue culture propagules, rather than rooted cuttings, and the ratio of input and output was up to 4.08:1.