CAJ | 학술논문

纺织服装制造业作为我国参与国际竞争与合作的传统产业，其在城市内部的空间分布格局正呈现出新的特征。基于微观企业数据，运用圈层分析、热点分析和核密度估计方法，探究上海大都市区纺织服装制造业空间格局形成及演化规律。结果表明：1）上海纺织服装制造业企业布局的郊区化趋势明显，布局热点区从中心城区及近郊区向远郊区转移。2）境外、合资企业主要分布在近郊区，且空间位置变化不明显，相对前两者，在远郊区内资企业布局强度显著提升；大型企业主要分布在城市中心区东北部，以及交通便捷的近郊区和地方中心区，中型企业在分布范围和郊区分布的强度上均大于大型企业，小微型企业在远郊区分布密度趋于增强，且明显高于大中型企业。3）格局演化的主要影响机制包括：历史积淀、区位条件变迁、金融危机和政策调控、规划引导。
방직복장제조업작위아국삼여국제경쟁여합작적전통산업，기재성시내부적공간분포격국정정현출신적특정。기우미관기업수거，운용권층분석、열점분석화핵밀도고계방법，탐구상해대도시구방직복장제조업공간격국형성급연화규률。결과표명：1）상해방직복장제조업기업포국적교구화추세명현，포국열점구종중심성구급근교구향원교구전이。2）경외、합자기업주요분포재근교구，차공간위치변화불명현，상대전량자，재원교구내자기업포국강도현저제승；대형기업주요분포재성시중심구동북부，이급교통편첩적근교구화지방중심구，중형기업재분포범위화교구분포적강도상균대우대형기업，소미형기업재원교구분포밀도추우증강，차명현고우대중형기업。3）격국연화적주요영향궤제포괄：역사적정、구위조건변천、금융위궤화정책조공、규화인도。
Based on the data from enterprises of textile and garment manufacturing from 1995 to 2012 in Shanghai, this paper explores the formation and evolution of the spatial pattern of textile and garment manufacturing in metropolitan areas by using methods of circle analysis, hot spot analysis and kernel density estimation. The results are as follows:First, enterprises are mainly located in the 10-30 km radius circle from city center, the suburbanization trend of enterprises is obvious and the hot zone transfers from central city areas and suburban areas to exurban areas. Second, the spatial distribution trend of enterprises of different nature and scale has its own features:foreign capital companies and joint venture enterprises are mainly located in suburban areas and their spatial location does not change obviously, the distribution intensity of domestic enterprises is significantly higher than that of joint ventures and foreign enterprises in the exurban areas;large enterprises are mainly located in northeast area of the city centre, as well as suburban areas and local centers with convenient traffic, mid-size enterprises are much stronger than large enterprises both on the range and intensity of distribution, the distribution density of small micro-enterprises in the exurban area is significantly higher than mid-size and large enterprises. Third, the results indicate that the factors such as history, change of geographical conditions, financial crisis, policy adjustment and planning guidance are the main driving factors.