中国卫生产业
中國衛生產業
중국위생산업
CHINA HEALTH INDUSTRY
2014年
16期
35-36
,共2页
中西医结合%临床%脑梗死患者%CSS评分%影响
中西醫結閤%臨床%腦梗死患者%CSS評分%影響
중서의결합%림상%뇌경사환자%CSS평분%영향
Integrative Medicine%Clinical%Cerebral infarction%CSS score%Impact
目的：探讨中西医结合治疗对临床脑梗死患者CSS评分的影响。方法从2011年11月-2013年11月，于我院共收治了58例脑梗死患者。以数字法随机分成观察组（29例）和对照组（29例）。对照组采用单纯的西医常规治疗，观察组在对照组治疗的基础上加用中医治疗，对比两组疗效以及治疗前后两组患者CSS评分情况。结果两组采用不同治疗方案治疗后，观察组疗效优良率为93.10%，对照组的优良率62.07%，观察组疗效显著高于对照组。差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组治疗后CSS评分为（10.34±3.12），对照组为（15.27±2.89），治疗后CSS评分观察组显著低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论采用中西医结合治疗脑梗死患者疗效更佳，可以明显减少患者神经功能缺损程度，还能降低该病的病死率和病残率。该方案值得在临床上推广运用。
目的：探討中西醫結閤治療對臨床腦梗死患者CSS評分的影響。方法從2011年11月-2013年11月，于我院共收治瞭58例腦梗死患者。以數字法隨機分成觀察組（29例）和對照組（29例）。對照組採用單純的西醫常規治療，觀察組在對照組治療的基礎上加用中醫治療，對比兩組療效以及治療前後兩組患者CSS評分情況。結果兩組採用不同治療方案治療後，觀察組療效優良率為93.10%，對照組的優良率62.07%，觀察組療效顯著高于對照組。差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）；觀察組治療後CSS評分為（10.34±3.12），對照組為（15.27±2.89），治療後CSS評分觀察組顯著低于對照組，差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。結論採用中西醫結閤治療腦梗死患者療效更佳，可以明顯減少患者神經功能缺損程度，還能降低該病的病死率和病殘率。該方案值得在臨床上推廣運用。
목적：탐토중서의결합치료대림상뇌경사환자CSS평분적영향。방법종2011년11월-2013년11월，우아원공수치료58례뇌경사환자。이수자법수궤분성관찰조（29례）화대조조（29례）。대조조채용단순적서의상규치료，관찰조재대조조치료적기출상가용중의치료，대비량조료효이급치료전후량조환자CSS평분정황。결과량조채용불동치료방안치료후，관찰조료효우량솔위93.10%，대조조적우량솔62.07%，관찰조료효현저고우대조조。차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）；관찰조치료후CSS평분위（10.34±3.12），대조조위（15.27±2.89），치료후CSS평분관찰조현저저우대조조，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론채용중서의결합치료뇌경사환자료효경가，가이명현감소환자신경공능결손정도，환능강저해병적병사솔화병잔솔。해방안치득재림상상추엄운용。
Objective To investigate the effects of combination therapy for patients with cerebral infarction CSS clinical score . Methods From November 2011 to November 2013, 58 patients with cerebral infarction were treated in our hospital. Digital ran-domly divided into observation group(29cases) and control group (29cases ).Control group using a simple routine western medicine , Chinese medicine treatment was observed in the group with the control group, based on the comparison of two groups of patients before and after treatment efficacy and CSS score situation. Results The two groups with different treatment regimens after treat-ment , the observation group was 93.10%excellent , excellent rate of 62.07%in the control group , the observation group was sig-nificantly higher.The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);observation group after treatment CSS score was (10.34±3.12), the control group was (15.27±2.89), CSS score after treatment was significantly lower than that observed in the control group , the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05 ). Conclusion The combination therapy in patients with cerebral infarction better ef-ficacy,can significantly reduce the degree of functional impairment in patients with nerve disease can reduce mortality and mor-bidity.The program is worth in clinical use .
