CAJ | 학술논문

随着互联网技术的发展，对人物形象的侵权已经拓展到网络游戏中。“六小龄童”认为游戏公司侵犯其表演者权、肖像权和商标权。就表演者权而言，“六小龄童”无法拿出足够证据证明“孙悟空”形象的唯一指向性，即普通民众看见“孙悟空”形象即认为是“六小龄童”。就肖像权而言，“六小龄童”扮演的“孙悟空”是非人形象，与其本人肖像相差太多。就商标权而言，如果游戏形象与商标相同或类似，则可以构成侵权。
수착호련망기술적발전，대인물형상적침권이경탁전도망락유희중。“륙소령동”인위유희공사침범기표연자권、초상권화상표권。취표연자권이언，“륙소령동”무법나출족구증거증명“손오공”형상적유일지향성，즉보통민음간견“손오공”형상즉인위시“륙소령동”。취초상권이언，“륙소령동”분연적“손오공”시비인형상，여기본인초상상차태다。취상표권이언，여과유희형상여상표상동혹유사，칙가이구성침권。
With the development of Internet technology ,the infringement of characters that been extended to the network game ."Liuxiaolingtong"thought game companies violated his performer right ,portrait right and trademark right .On the right of performer ,"Liuxiaolingtong"cannot come up with enough evidence to prove the sole-orientation of the"Sun Wukong"im-age ,which means "Sun Wukong"would only remind people of "Liuxiaolingtong".On the right of portrait ,"Sun Wukong"that"Liuxiaolingtong"played is not the image himself .As on the right of trade mark ,if the game image and trademark are identical or similar ,that can be considered as infringement .