CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对UF-100尿沉渣分析仪、尿液干化学分析仪检测尿液中红细胞与尿沉渣镜检法检测红细胞进行比较，以对尿液中红细胞进行最为准确的判断。方法：采集1200例住院患者的晨尿尿液标本，采用尿沉渣分析系统、尿液干化学分析仪与尿沉渣显微镜检测对其进行分析，检测尿液中的红细胞。结果：尿沉渣分析仪检测红细胞阳性率为18.8%，尿液干化学检测红细胞阳性率为16.3%，镜检阳性率为13.2%。结论：尿沉渣分析系统、尿液干化学法和显微镜检测尿液中红细胞结果存在差异，前两种方法受某些因素影响可出现假阳性及假阴性，因此尿液常规检测中均不能替代显微镜检查，应将3种检测方法相结合共同为临床提供准确可靠的红细胞检测依据。
목적：대UF-100뇨침사분석의、뇨액간화학분석의검측뇨액중홍세포여뇨침사경검법검측홍세포진행비교，이대뇨액중홍세포진행최위준학적판단。방법：채집1200례주원환자적신뇨뇨액표본，채용뇨침사분석계통、뇨액간화학분석의여뇨침사현미경검측대기진행분석，검측뇨액중적홍세포。결과：뇨침사분석의검측홍세포양성솔위18.8%，뇨액간화학검측홍세포양성솔위16.3%，경검양성솔위13.2%。결론：뇨침사분석계통、뇨액간화학법화현미경검측뇨액중홍세포결과존재차이，전량충방법수모사인소영향가출현가양성급가음성，인차뇨액상규검측중균불능체대현미경검사，응장3충검측방법상결합공동위림상제공준학가고적홍세포검측의거。
Objective:To do the comparative analysis on red blood cells through UF-100 urine sediment analyzer, Urine Dry Chemistry Analyze and urine sediment microscopy for finding the most accurate judgment on red blood cells in the urine. Methods:Morning urine collected from 1200 cases of hospitalized patients with urine specimens, the UF-100 urine sediment analysis system, urine dry chemical analyzer and urine sediment microscopy detection to analyze it, detecting urine red blood cells. Results:UF-100 urine sediment analyzer detecting red blood cell positive rate was 18.8%, the urine dry chemical detecting red blood cell positive rate was 16.3%, microscopy positive rate was 13.2%. Conclusion:Urinary sediment analysis system, urine red blood cells in urine dry chemistry method and microscope test results vary, before two kinds of methods is influenced by certain factors can appear false positives and false negatives, so all can't replace the microscope examination in urine routine test, three methods should be combined together to provide accurate and reliable basis for clinical.