CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较研究视感知疗法在学龄期儿童屈光参差性弱视中使用压抑与遮盖法的疗效。方法将78例（155眼）学龄期儿童屈光参差性弱视患者，分别行压抑（43例，85眼）和遮盖（35例，70眼）法矫正视力较好眼，使用视感知疗法治疗1年后应用统计学分析疗效。结果压抑法的疗效优于遮盖法（P＜0.05），总有效率也高于遮盖法（P＜0.05），在轻、中度弱视患者中，压抑法的疗效均优于遮盖法（P＜0.05），而在重度患者中，两组疗效比较差异无统计学意义（ P＞0.05）。结论在采用视感知疗法治疗学龄儿童屈光参差性弱视患者中，压抑法矫正视力的效果比遮盖法要好。
목적：비교연구시감지요법재학령기인동굴광삼차성약시중사용압억여차개법적료효。방법장78례（155안）학령기인동굴광삼차성약시환자，분별행압억（43례，85안）화차개（35례，70안）법교정시력교호안，사용시감지요법치료1년후응용통계학분석료효。결과압억법적료효우우차개법（P＜0.05），총유효솔야고우차개법（P＜0.05），재경、중도약시환자중，압억법적료효균우우차개법（P＜0.05），이재중도환자중，량조료효비교차이무통계학의의（ P＞0.05）。결론재채용시감지요법치료학령인동굴광삼차성약시환자중，압억법교정시력적효과비차개법요호。
Obej ctive To compare the effect between penalization and occlusion in the perceptual learning for treatment of school-age children with anisometropic amblyopia .Methods In the perceptual learning for treatment of school-age children with anisometropic amblyopia ,85 eyes of 43 patients received the penalization ( penalization group) and 70 eyes of 35 patients received the occlusion(occlusion group).After 1 year researching was analyzed. Results The effects of the penalization group were better than the occlusion′s,the effects in both slight and moderate amblyopia of the penalization group also better than occlusion′s,their difference had the statistical significance ( P<0.05 ) ,but in the severe amblyopia ,the difference of the effect between two groups had no statistical significance ( P>0.05 ) .Conclusion In the perceptual learning for treatment of school-age children with anisometropic amblyopia ,u-sing the penalization may have higher total effect than using the occlusion .