环球中医药
環毬中醫藥
배구중의약
GLOBAL TCM
2013年
z2期
41-42
,共2页
黄优华%徐强%沈涛%石红建
黃優華%徐彊%瀋濤%石紅建
황우화%서강%침도%석홍건
脑动脉瘤%CTA%DSA%诊断
腦動脈瘤%CTA%DSA%診斷
뇌동맥류%CTA%DSA%진단
Cerebral aneurysm%CTA%DSA%Diagnosis
目的:对比分析CTA与DSA三维成像诊断脑动脉瘤的价值。方法以我院收治的34例脑动脉瘤患者为研究对象,分别采用CTA与DSA技术进行检查,对检查结果作分析、对照、治疗。具体统计CTA与DSA的检出率,并对CTA与DSA检查诊断的敏感性、特异性进行计算。结果 DSA检查检出率为97.56%,CTA为95.12%,2组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。DSA检查诊断敏感性为97.30%,特异性为75%;C T A检查诊断的敏感性为94.87%,诊断特异性为100%。在诊断敏感性上,二者比较,差异无统计学意义( P>0.05);在诊断特异性上,二者比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 CTA三维成像与DSA旋转成像在脑动脉瘤的临床诊断中均有较高的应用价值,但CTA诊断的特异性要略高于DSA ,且简单、无创、安全,可作为脑动脉瘤诊断的首选方法。DSA在造影诊断虽为侵入性检查,但在检查的同时对大部分脑动脉瘤病例可以采用介入填塞治疗。
目的:對比分析CTA與DSA三維成像診斷腦動脈瘤的價值。方法以我院收治的34例腦動脈瘤患者為研究對象,分彆採用CTA與DSA技術進行檢查,對檢查結果作分析、對照、治療。具體統計CTA與DSA的檢齣率,併對CTA與DSA檢查診斷的敏感性、特異性進行計算。結果 DSA檢查檢齣率為97.56%,CTA為95.12%,2組比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。DSA檢查診斷敏感性為97.30%,特異性為75%;C T A檢查診斷的敏感性為94.87%,診斷特異性為100%。在診斷敏感性上,二者比較,差異無統計學意義( P>0.05);在診斷特異性上,二者比較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論 CTA三維成像與DSA鏇轉成像在腦動脈瘤的臨床診斷中均有較高的應用價值,但CTA診斷的特異性要略高于DSA ,且簡單、無創、安全,可作為腦動脈瘤診斷的首選方法。DSA在造影診斷雖為侵入性檢查,但在檢查的同時對大部分腦動脈瘤病例可以採用介入填塞治療。
목적:대비분석CTA여DSA삼유성상진단뇌동맥류적개치。방법이아원수치적34례뇌동맥류환자위연구대상,분별채용CTA여DSA기술진행검사,대검사결과작분석、대조、치료。구체통계CTA여DSA적검출솔,병대CTA여DSA검사진단적민감성、특이성진행계산。결과 DSA검사검출솔위97.56%,CTA위95.12%,2조비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。DSA검사진단민감성위97.30%,특이성위75%;C T A검사진단적민감성위94.87%,진단특이성위100%。재진단민감성상,이자비교,차이무통계학의의( P>0.05);재진단특이성상,이자비교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론 CTA삼유성상여DSA선전성상재뇌동맥류적림상진단중균유교고적응용개치,단CTA진단적특이성요략고우DSA ,차간단、무창、안전,가작위뇌동맥류진단적수선방법。DSA재조영진단수위침입성검사,단재검사적동시대대부분뇌동맥류병례가이채용개입전새치료。
Objective To analysis the CTA three-dimensional imaging and DSA rotation value of imaging diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms . Methods In our hospital 68 cases of cerebral aneurysm patients as the research object ,used CTA and DSA technology in diagnosis respectively .Ac-cording to the results of the digital surgical pathology confirmed statistical rate of CTA and DSA ,and CTA and DSA examination diagnostic sensi-tivity and specificity were calculated .Results The DSA examination detection rate was 96.34% ,CTA was 95.12% ,and the comparison of two groups ,there was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) .DSA examination diagnosis sensitivity 96.05% ,specificity 83.33% ;CTA check the sensitivity of diagnosis was 94.87% ,specificity was 100% .On the diagnostic sensitivity ,both comparisons ,there was no statistically significant difference(P>0.05);on the diagnostic specificity ,the comparison ,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) .Conclusion CTA 3-d rota-tion imaging and DSA imaging in clinical diagnosis of brain aneurysms have higher application value ,but the specificity is slightly higher than DSA , CTA diagnosis and is simple ,noninvasive ,safe ,and can be used as the preferred methods for the diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms.