CAJ | 학술논문

构建科学、公正、合理的人文社会科学评价指标体系，一直是管理部门和学术界的共同愿望。创新、价值、质量、影响力、显示度等是各种指标体系中的使用高频指标。当前在理论研究和评价实践中，由于评价者对其确切涵义的理解不当，导致了诸多评价指标与评价目的偏差，从而造成评价结果的失真。旨在从评价指标的源头入手，厘清各个指标的内涵及其关系，以期为学界同行提供借鉴。
구건과학、공정、합리적인문사회과학평개지표체계，일직시관리부문화학술계적공동원망。창신、개치、질량、영향력、현시도등시각충지표체계중적사용고빈지표。당전재이론연구화평개실천중，유우평개자대기학절함의적리해불당，도치료제다평개지표여평개목적편차，종이조성평개결과적실진。지재종평개지표적원두입수，전청각개지표적내함급기관계，이기위학계동행제공차감。
It has always been a common desire of management department and academia to build a scientific, fair and reasonable evalua-tion index system of humanities and social science. There are many high-frequency words existing in various index systems such as inno-vation, value, quality, influence, visibility etc. Current theoretical research and evaluation practices show that the deviation between eval-uation purpose and evaluation index is due to the inappropriate understanding of index meaning. In this paper, we try our best to clarify the implications of each index and the logical relationship of them based on the analysis on the misuse of evaluation index, hoping to provide some references for academic peers.